PRIMS Full-text transcription (HTML)

Reſponſoria ad Erratica Paſtoris, SIƲE, VINDICIAE VINDICIARUM. ID EST, The Shepherds Wandrings diſcovered, in a Revindication of the great Ordinance of GOD: Goſpel-Preachers, and Preaching.

By way of Reply and Anſwer to a late Booke, called, The Peoples priviledges, and duty guarded againſt the Pulpit and Preachers encroachment. And their ſober juſtification and defence of their free and open expoſition of Scriptures. Publiſhed by William Sheppard, Eſq.

Wherein Mr Sheppards pretended guard, conſiſting of ten Propoſitions and ten Arguments, is examined, and found to weare nothing but wooden Swords. And all his Replyes to Mr Tho. Halls Argu­ments, and Mr Collinges Arguments in his Vindiciae Miniſterii, brought againſt Not ordained perſons ordinary preaching, are found but cavils and too light. And the Truth ſtill maintained, That thoſe that dig in the Lords Vineyard muſt be ſent; in that, Prea­ching and expounding Scripture publiquely, are proper acts to Goſpel-Officers; not common to all.

Wherein alſo the great queſtion, How far the Spirit of God (that dwels in all the Saints) doth or doth not inable them to underſtand Scripture, is opened. And in it is plainly diſcovered by Mr Shep­pards wreſtings and miſ-applications of Scripture: that himſelf hath not ſuch a ſpirit of Scripture interpretation as is fitting for them that publickly open the Scriptures; and in the Preface is ſhewed how much the holy Spirit of God is abuſed in theſe evill times.

By John Gollings, M.A. and Preacher of the Goſpel in Norwich.

Iſ. 28.20. For the bed is ſhorter then that a man can ſtretch himſelf on it, and the covering narrower then that he can wrap up himſelfe in it.
Quis enim mediocriter ſanus non facile intelligat, Scripturarum expoſitionem, ab iis pe­tendam eſſe, qui earum doctores ſe eſſe profitentur. Fierique poſſe inermo id ſemper accidere, ut multa indoctis videantur abſurda, quae cum à doctoribus exponuntur, laudanda videantur elatius, quo abjectius aſpernanda videbantur & eo accipiantur aperta dulcius, quo clauſa difficilius aperiebantur. D. Aug. de moribus Eccl. Cathol. & Manichaeorum; t. 1. operum impr. Col. Agrip. p. 286. col. B. I.

London, Printed for R. Tomlins at the Sun and Bible neer Pie-corner. 1652.

1

A PREFATORY DISCOURSE CONTAINING, The Authors reaſons of his undertaking this work; and ſeverall things of moment are diſcovered in it, concerning the motions and impulſions, and workings of the Spirit; tending to the trying of the Spirits. And humbly directed To all ſuch (in England) as feare the Lord, and deſire to make his Word a Light unto their feet.

Deare Friends!

IT is now Twelve moneths ſince I preſented you with my Vindiea­tion of the Goſpel-Miniſtry: Some diſcouragements I had in that worke; for when my notes were finiſhed, that very week came out Mr Halls Book of the ſame ſubject,Pulpit guarded and I heard of more (Elaborate labours) then ready for the Preſſe, upon the ſame Subject. The nature of my Subject ſpake for me, that I ſought not in it to pleaſe Men: but to ſhew my ſelfe a Servant of the Lord Jeſus Chriſts. The Jezebel of Liberti­niſme looked out at the window, and I appre­hended the Lord Jeſus Chriſt calling, who is on2 my ſide? who? ſince which time I have met with none that have oppoſed the truths I en­deavoured to maintaine, except one Collier who encountred the Pulpit-guard. Pulpit guard routed, by I. Collier. Two things ſilen­ced my Pen as to him. 1. He onely mentioned me in the laſt lines of his Book; but bent his force againſt a ſtronger adverſary, who I knew was able to encounter him. 2. But my chiefe Reaſon was, my ſight of his blaſphemous Diſ­courſe at Axbridge; which ſatisfied me concer­ning him; that as his Tongue was little Slander to our cauſe: ſo it was little credit to that which he pretended to Manage; this made me reſolve to let him alone, leſt I ſhould be like unto him, or make him wiſe in his own conceit. In which reſo­lution I was after confirmed, meeting with Mr. Jerribies reſerve,Pulpit-guard relieved, by Mr. Jerriby. which I ſaw was enough to deale with his beggerly reaſon.

Some twelve dayes ſince there came to my hands Mr. Sheppards Book, called, The peo­ples priviledge and duty guarded. Though I have little time to attend Reading or anſwering Pamphlets, and am the meaneſt ſervant of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt in that work, yet ſeveral things prevail'd with me, to the preſent undertaking of which I will give thee a briefe account.

The firſt was the Credit of the Gentleman that wrote it, William Sheppard, Eſqu. Sounds more them Tom Collier.

A ſecond was the Sobriety of the Gentlemans ſpirit. Had he been one that had ſo farre got the maſtery of his conſcience, as to have railed3 on Miniſters and Miniſtry: I ſhould onely have ſpread his railing paper before the Lord,Iſ. 37.14. Jude 9. and have ſaid, The Lord rebuke thee. But I perceived him of another ſpirit, and as much contending for ſome truth, as diſputing againſt others.

A Third was, that he had done me the ho­nour now and then to name me and my Booke: and ſo engaged me in the quarrell, as one of thoſe Preachers which he is pleaſed to reflect upon as encroaching upon the peoples duty.

A Fourth was, the preſent juncture of time. There is the great deſigne of God under the Goſpell to lead his Saints into all Truth, now the father of lies is ſuch a gainer by the darke­neſſe of Errour and Ignorance, that he is loth Truth ſhould prevaile too faſt. And for the con­tinuall exerciſe of his Saints in all Ages, the Lord Jeſus hath beene content to diſpute his ground by inches with the Devill (as the Devill hath raiſed up ſome in all ages to oppoſe truth; one truth more then other in every Age: ſo the Lord hath raiſed up ſome Servants of his in all Ages to appeare in the defence of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt and his Goſpell. Mr. Hookein his Preface to Survey of Church-diſcipline. Herbert Tem­ple ſacred Po­ems, 188.It was holy and learned Mr. Hookers notion: that the Devill had beene undermining the Lord Jeſus Chriſt in his three Offices, and it was that divine Poets to it though in a little different way, before him.

As Sinne in Greece a Prophet was before,
And in old Rome a mighty Emperour:
So now being Prieſt he plainly did profeſſe,
Church mili­tant.
To make a jeſt of Chriſts three Offices.
4

God had an Arke under the Law, in which was lockt up the Golden pot that had Manna; and Aarons rod that budded, and the Tables of the Cove­nant:Heb. 9 4. Exod. 16.21.4.20. Num. 17.10. Exod. 16.33. And over this were the Cherubims of Glory. The Lord hath his Ark under the Goſpell: o­ver which the Cherubims of glory ſtand, and three things are laid up in it: 1. The teſtimonie of the Goſpell Covenant: the pure doctrine of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt. 2. The Manna of divine wor­ſhip: Goſpell worſhip, and Ordinances. 3. And (the ſecond) Aarons rod: the Goſpell Govern­ment of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt. Theſe things are laid up in the Goſpell Arke, and to attend the Church of Chriſt, the true Church in all its mo­tions. The old Thiefe, that knowes theſe are the Churches Palladium and life guard: which while a Church keepes, the gates of hell cannot prevaile againſt it: Hath made it his worke to attempt the robbing of the Church of this trea­ſury in all times. His firſt deſigne was to rob it of the great fundamentall Goſpell Doctrines of the truth of the Divine and humane nature in the perſon of the Mediator, and of the great truths of the Reſurrection of the body. To the latter purpoſe, he ſtirred up the Sadduces, Acts 23.8. the Epicureans and Stoicks, Acts 17.18. Paul and the other Apoſtles were ſtirred up by God,Euſeb. l. 3. c. 27 28. l. 7 c. 23. Anno Chriſti. 60. 90. Epiph. t. 2. to oppoſe thoſe hereſies. Ebion and Cerinthus were muſtred up againſt Chriſt by Sathan, and the Lord ſtirres up St. John in his firſt Epiſtle, to defend the Mediatorſhip of his Son. After them Baſilides & Saturninus, Valentians, Marcion, Cerdo,5 the Gnoſticks. Iren l. 5 hereſ. anno 270, 276, 280.Againſt the latter of which the Lord ſtirred up Ireneus, & Tertullian. After theſe Sabellius & Samoſetanus, Manes: and Arrius, anno 320: Macedonius and Photinus Aetius, Eunomius, Neſtorius, Pelagus, Eutyches, againſt thoſe the Lord ſtirred up Athanaſius and Auguſtine, and Greg. Nyſ­nus,Baſilius. Greg. Naz. St. Ambroſe, and others to maintain his great truths, relating to the Ʋnity of the divine eſſence, The trinity of the perſons: the divine and humane nature of Chriſt in one perſon, the freeneſſe of divine grace &c. Within 500 yeares or little more the Devill laid theſe Inſtruments aſide. Truth pre­vail'd, and although after times have produced a Servetus, and ſome others: yet they never came to any conſiderable head, but came up as ſingle weeds, and were quickly puld out. In our times the Devill hath had one or two of theſe we••s Beſt and Collier &c. but they come to no great height:Diſcourſe at Axbridge. theſe were the Goliaths of thoſe times; and the contrary to theſe the truths which were the truths of the times: in the de­fence of which God ſtirred up his Davids; when the old thiefe ſaw the Teſtimony of the Covenant was out of his reach, he attempts to ſteale Aarons rod, putting the Scepter that belong'd to the Lord Jeſus Chriſt into the hands of Popes and Cardinals, & Generall Councels: crying up their in­fallibility &c. And thus he flouriſhed a long time till God ſtirred up Wickliff and Hus, and Luther, & others: anno 1520 &c. and ſet them to watch this; Calvin alſo was ſent to their aſſiſtance: theſe had a long combate, they and their ſucceſſors to6 wring the Scepter of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt out of the hands of Popes, Cardinals, Biſhops, Archbi­ſhops, Lordbiſhops, Prieſts, and to put it into the hands of Paſtors, Elders and Deacons, Chriſts right proper Officers. This was the worke of latter times, in which alſo the Devill was nibling at fundamentall truths by Socinus in Polonia ſome of the Pelagian ſtampe, and the Arminians in the Netherlands; of both which he ſent ſome into England, againſt whom the Lord ſtirred up Bradwardin here againſt the Pelagians, others againſt the Socinians, and a Synod of Dort, be­ſides divers ſingle hands; among'ſt whom lear­ned Twiſſe againſt the Arminians. But the great controverſies of the times ſeemed to reſpect the Government of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt. Likewiſe Dr. Ames, and Mr. Owen. The old thief ſeeing that this Rod of Aaron is not to be got e­very one decrying Popes, Cardinals, Arch••••ps, Lordbiſhops &c.

He is now labouring for the pot of Manna, to ſpoile the Church of Goſpell Ordinances. And the great queſtion of theſe times ſeemes to be whe­ther the Ordinances of the Lord Jeſus for his Church be his or no? whether they ſhall hold or no.

This is a controverſie to which former times hath not been a ſtranger to. Eraſtus was before our dayes, ſo were the Anabaptiſts in Germany. But the Devill ſeemes to me to have an emi­nent deſigne at all the Ordinances of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt now; and to mannage this not by a ſingle Eraſtus, but bringing all his force, into the field. Nor is this his onely deſigne for there is7 not a fundamentall truth of Chriſt that he is not quarrelling for, nor are his endeavours all done againſt his glorious Scepter. He rageth, ſurely his time is but ſhort, I thinke ſometimes that he is about to fight his great battell upon which he will venture all. But his old legions of Hereticks are more out of Heart, and keepe in the Reare; the Van of his Army ſeemes to be a­gainſt Goſpell ordinances and worſhip in our dayes: and indeed he may venture all againſt that, for if he can but deſtroy the Practick of Truth, he needs do no more. The Lord Jeſus Chriſt hath left his Churches ſeverall Ordinan­ces. 1. Goſpell Officers, theſe are his Ordinance. Eph. 4.11:1 Cor. 4.1. to theſe belongs the preaching of his Goſpell and adminiſtring his Sacraments, and all acts of Church Government: For the autho­rizing of theſe he hath appointed.

2. His great Ordinance of Ordination,1 Tim. 4.15. Acts 13.1.2, 3. Acts 6.6. Titus 1.4. 1 Tim. 5.22. 1 Tim. 4.14. and hath ordained that thoſe that admi­niſter his publike Ordinances ſhould be able and faithful, ſuch as are able to ſtudy the Scriptures, and give themſelves wholly to them, that ſuch ſhould have the Goſpell committed to them, 2 Tim. 2.2. and be ſolemnly ſet a part by faſting and prayer, and laying on of the hands of the Preſbytery. Acts 13.1, 2, 3. 1 Tim. 4.14.

3. He hath, inſtead of his great Ordinance of Circumciſion, left his Ordinance of Baptiſme to be adminiſtred to all Nations, Math. 28.20. to Believers and their children, Acts 2.38, 39.

84. He hath inſtead of the Paſſeover ordained the great Ordinance of his Supper Luk. 22.18, 19, 20. to be adminiſtred to his Diſciples, to thoſe that can examin themſelves, diſcerne the Lords Body, eate and drinke worthily, 1 Cor. 11.

5. He hath left us (as a ſinke to cleanſe his Church, which is his houſe) the great Ordi­nance of Excommunication, Math. 18. to be exe­cuted upon Hereticks, Titus 3.10. and prophane perſons, 2 Tim. 3.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. 1 Cor. 5.4.

6. For the benefit of his Church he hath left us his great Ordinance of Magiſtracy, to be a ter­rour to Evill doers, Rom. 13.3. ſuch as work the workes of the fleſh. Adultery, Fornication, un­cleanneſſe, laſciviouſneſſe, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulation, wrath, ſtrifes, ſeditions, Here­ſies, Gal. 5.20, 21. Theſe are the great Or­dinances of the Lord Jeſus, againſt which the Devill is this day muſtring his Armies. 1. In the forlorne hope he hath a ragged Regiment of Ranters who deny all Ordinances,See Law of freedome, by Winſtanly, a p. 65. ad p. 63. theſe are led on by Jerrard Winſtanly and ſeverall others of that ſtampe; theſe are no great Number, yet a Regi­ment or two may be found of theſe marked with the greateſt markes of Blaſphemy and leud­neſſe. 2. In the next place come on his Regi­ments whoſe Motto is no Magiſtracy, theſe are the Levellers, and of theſe there is no ſmall num­ber, men of deſperate ſpirits and principles. 3. In the third place come in ſome Regiments as will acknowledge a Magiſtracy,Their Motto is Chriſtiano Ma­giſtratui nihil cum ſacris. but with clipt wings, ſuch as ſhould have nothing to doe with9 the glory of God, and the intereſt of Chriſt and his Goſpell, but muſt have their hands tyed up from medling with Idolaters or Blaſphemers, or any though never ſo dangerous hereticks.

Theſe pretend themſelves friends to Magi­ſtracy,P. Mart. loc. com. claſ. 2. c. 4. Melancton in loc. com. de Magiſtratu civili. Pareum in Rom. 13. Gualther. in ep. ad Gal. c. 4. but would deſtroy the end for which God hath ordained them, and that is, that his Elect might live under them Godly and quiet and pea­ceable lives, that they might be a terrour to evill works, theſe are to be the Guardians of his Church, in this wilderneſſe. Can any Chriſtian Magiſtra­cy thinke that the great God who made all things for himſelf and for his own Glory ſhould ordaine Magiſtrates (one of his higheſt Ordinan­ces) for ſo low an end as onely to keepe men from quarrelling one with another, as if the office of a Chriſtian Magiſtrate were no more then the of­fice of a Keeper of Beares. No, no, God forbid it ſhould enter into their thoughts; he hath ſaid they are Gods, and their deſigne ſhould be high­er then meerely to keepe civill peace, even to advance Chriſt, to cut them off and caſt them out from the Lords heritage who ſpit in the face of his glory. 4. A Fourth Regiment he hath whoſe Motto is no Goſpell Miniſtry,Scim••contemp­tum miniſterii eſſe nocentiſſi­mam peſtem. Luther. in cap. 12. Gen. Eraſtus and Socinus firſt commanded theſe, and theſe are as dangerous as the firſt; for it muſt follow then no Ordinances: he hath ſeverall ringleaders of this faction in England this day.

It were infinite to muſter up all his Regi­ments, he is the Prince〈…〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉ſaith the Apoſtle, he hath great powers in the ayre.

10

Now there are many that are not ſworn ſer­vants of Satan in this deſigne, but are under high temptations this day, and though they think and meane not ſo, yet they ſerve him ve­ry farre in this deſigne of rooting out the Ordi­nances of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt. 1. Such as are for generall admiſſions to the ſupper of the Lord. 2. Such as are againſt Baptizing of Children. 3. Such as cry downe the miniſtry of England as Antichriſti­an. 4. Such as cry out ſo loud againſt Elders in Chur­ches. 5. Such as plead againſt Ordination. Many of theſe may be holy and gratious, but Doubtleſſe the Lord Jeſus Chriſt is little beholden to them in point of defending his Ordinances and the purity and power of them.

If all ſhould be admitted to the Sacrament of the Supper, ſurely Chriſt would not onely have admitted his Diſciples and baulk'd them in the ſame houſe, ſure he would have bid his Diſci­ples go and give my ſupper to all Nations, ſurely the Apoſtle would not have bidden men examine themſelves, &c.

If children ſhould not be baptized, ſurely they ſhould not have beene circumciſed, the promiſe ſhould not belong to them, Acts 2.37, 38. ſurely the Covenant of grace is not ſtraightned under the Goſpel.

If the Miniſtry of Chriſt in England be Anti­chriſtian, what are all thoſe that are converted and baptized by that miniſtry, where are our Fathers that died under that miniſtry? how come we to be Churches; being not baptized perſons. If I, ſaith Chriſt, by Beelzebub caſt out De­vils,11 by whom doe your children caſt them out?

If Elders be no Officers in the Church of Chriſt, who are they we read of, 12 Rom. 7.8. 1 Tim. 5.17.

If Ordination be not Jeſus Chriſts Ordinance for ordaining Goſpell preachers and Officers, why did the Apoſtles uſe it, Acts 6.6. why did God call for it, Acts 13.1, 2, 3. why is Titus left in Crete for that purpoſe, Titus 1.3. why was Ti­mothy ordained, 1 Tim. 4.14, and commanded not to lay on hands ſuddenly: 1 Tim. 5, 22.

There are ſome others, who acknowledge a Miniſtry to be the Ordinance of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt, and that Preaching is their worke, but thinke that any others, though not Miniſters, may Preach publikely and conſtantly. Many there are of theſe; whom I deſire to honour for their grace and ſobriety, conſpicuous in many things, but if I miſtake not, as, by this opinion they are more then ordinarily ſerviceable to Satan in his preſent deſigne to deſtroy all Goſ­pell Ordinances, ſo they are in a great errour in this very thing.

1. Firſt I ſay, I take them to be too ſervicea­ble to Satans deſigne in theſe dayes, which I ap­prehend to be, The bringing of this great Ordi­nance of God into contempt, and making it uſeleſſe: and the deſtruction of all the Ordinances of Chriſt,Primum & ſummum opus praedicatoris docere fidem. Lutherus loc. com. c. 4. p. 30. what made Moſes and Aaron contemned, but Co­rah, Dathan and Abirams apprehenſion, they had as much right to draw nigh to God as they had Num. 16: And I cannot ſee by what reaſon we12 can ſay, that any may Preach, but it will hold à pari, yea à fortiori, they may adminiſter the Sa­craments too, and then farewell Miniſtry, yea, farewell at once all the Ordinances of Chriſt, to the eſſence of which belongs an Officer of his to adminiſter them, or they are no longer his In­ſtitutions, but meere humane ordinary acts worth little or nothing.

In this errour (Chriſtian Reader,) I have found this (ſober Gentleman) with whom I am dealing: I call him ſober, becauſe I finde him ve­ry ſober in many things, yea, Soberly managing this point, not in oppoſition to a Miniſtry, but pleading for it as a Co-ordinance of God, and in Partnerſhip with the Miniſters. Now this being a truth of the Times, (as I conceive oppoſed) I was the more willing to Engage in the Quar­rell.

5. A Fifth and great reaſon was, my conſide­ration of the Foundation upon which he built his o­pinion, which I humbly conceive is rotten: it ſeemes to be this. That all the Saints of God ha­ving the ſpirit of God, which is the ſpirit of interpre­tation, dwelling in them, they are forthwith enabled in ſome degree or other to underſtand the true mea­ning of Scripture ſo farre as to be able to deliver it, and Preach, and apply it to others. This made me more willing to undertake it, that I might ſpeake ſomething in the Vindication of the ho­ly Spirit of God ſo much this day abuſed: It is one of the moſt dangerous things the Scripture tels us of, either to deny the true and proper13 workings of the Spirit of God, or to force any thing upon it; both of theſe ſinners blaſpheme in a very high nature.

I ſhould be loth to come within a ſuſpition of denying any influence of the holy Spirit, I am ſenſible how ſad a guilt they come under that ſay, that he that caſts out Devils by the power of God doth it by the Prince of Devils. But I perſwade my ſelfe that there is not a greater cheat under Heaven this day, by which poore Chriſtians are deceived, and doe deceive them by pretences of the Spirit; give me leave therefore to ſpeak a lit­tle of this ſo neceſſary a Theme.

1. Firſt I take it for granted, that the ſoules of the moſt holy ſervants of God under Heaven, may be under temptations and prevail'd upon by temptati­ons. Jeſus Chriſt himſelfe was tempted, which of his ſervants then can thinke to be exemp­ted? and being lyable to Satans temptations are capable of receiving impreſſions from him. Now

2. There is nothing more certaine then that Satan is in all things (ſo farre as his power extends) an exact imitator of God and his ſpirit, that look as the holy Spirit of God workes, ſo the Devill will endeavour to worke alſo, mocking the holy Spirit as the Magicians did Moſes.

1. Both the holy and evill ſpirit agree in this, that they both worke, per modum afflatus, as Spi­rits worke, by making inward impreſſions up­on the Spirit of man.

2. As the Spirit of God dwelleth in the Saints and14 worketh conſtantly and effectually in them;Eph. 2. So the evill Spirit dwelleth in wicked and ungodly men, and worketh alſo conſtantly and effectu­ally in them.

3. As the ſpirit of God hath ſome ordinary and conſtant workings, others that are more rare, that it doth not alwayes doe, ſo the evill ſpirit hath. The Spirit of God alwayes dwells in the Saints, and is alwayes working in them, but it is not alwayes putting forth it ſelf in ſome ma­nifeſtations.

It is alwayes in the Saints as a Spirit of Grace and Supplication, and Sanctification, not alwayes as a Spirit of Conſolation, ſealing, &c. So the evill Spirit is alwayes working in the wicked, as a Spirit of unbeliefe and wickedneſſe, hardning and defiling their hearts, but it is not alwayes alike and e­qually working in their hearts, nor endeavou­ring to deceive the Elect. There are ſome more extraordinary puttings forth of the good ſpi­rit, and ſo alſo of the Evill Spirit which imita­teth the ſpirit of God:Illuminando. 1. As the Spirit of God doth more eſpecially worke in his Saints ſome­times by enlightning and illuminating the mind; ſo the evill Spirit doth at ſome times more eſpe­cially irradiate the mindes of others, and endea­vour with his counterfeit light, to cheat the underſtanding of the Saints; thus ſome thinke the Devill enlightned Balaams eyes, although others aſcribe it to God as his extraordinary worke,Revelando. in order to his own glory. 2. As the Spi­rit of God doth more immediately manifeſt it ſelfe15 ſometimes in diſcovering to the ſoules of his Saints things to come,Hunc nullum illuminat ſuper nos cum ex to effulget anima­bus noſtris, hoc eſt, in ſuperiori­bas viribus ani­marum noſtrrum ſplendor alicujus novae revelationis, aut gratiae ale ius; & quia rarò hoc fit & ipſi ſoli creatori natum eſt quando hc eplacat ſacre, dixit ſignatum eſſe lumen ipſius vulius ſuper nos, id eſt, clauſum, quia non fiunt hujuſmodi irradiationes niſi cum hujuſmodi lumen ſe aperit, & effandit, ad modum coruſcationis que fit ex mediis tenebris: vel propter hoc dixit, ſignatum, hoc eſt, clauſum, quia ignotum; pauciſſimi enim ſunt quibus lumen illud ſepauerit & innotuerit, & qui tantam propinquitatem ipſius ad animas noſtras noverint vide icet ut non fit mediam inter ipſum & animas noſtras, medium d co naturalis interpoſitio­n s; quod enim interdum mediatoris inter ipſum & nos ſancti Angeli ſunt, in cauſa interdum eſt, quia non-ſumus idonei ſplendore ipſius immediato irradiari. Gul. Pariſienſis de univerſo. 2. partē. c. 20. D. p. operum. 993. making impreſſions of them upon the Vnderſtanding as to his Prophets of old, and ſome under the New Teſtament, and ſo here and there one (ſince that time) in ſome eminent time.

Now I ſay as the Spirit of God doth this ſome times, though but rarely, ſo doth the Devill,Divinatio dei­tatis quaedam imitatio eſt jux­ta intentionem propriam nomi­nationis iſtius. Licet uſu certiſ­ſimo ſola malig­norum ſpirituum Revelatio divi­natio nomine­tur; neque enim beatos illos ac ſublimes ſpiri­tus divinare dicimus, ſic ne­que prophetas ſanctos divinare ullus hominum dixit, ſed magis prophetare, nqe divini ſed pophetae ſancti vocari conſueverunt, cum aliqua de ſecretis Creatoris revelant hominibus. Ʋulgariter autem divini nominentur, qi ex revelatione malig­narum ſecretaiqua vel occulta loquuntur. Gul. Pariſ. 2. p. de univerſo. p. 3. c. 18. operum p. 989. col. a. B. who having a fuller knowledge of things when firſt exiſtent in their naturall neceſſary cauſes, and being through his experience and wiſe­dome more able to make a judgement of con­ſequences and effects by his knowledge of counſells and meanes, &c. doth ſometimes for his advantage communicate this knowledge to wicked men, and may doe it to Gods people (if God permits him) to gaine himſelfe further ad­vantages: thus doubtleſſe the Aſtrologers and ſoothſayers of the Caldeans were inſpired by the Devill, and ſo alſo the Magicians of Egypt &c. So the witch which Saul went to.

14

But as the Lord doth thus ſeldome reveale himſelfe to his people, ſo doth the Devill very rarely for his credit ſake.

Impellendo.3. As the Spirit of God doth ſometimes ma­nifeſt it ſelfe by Extraordinary impulſions and motions to ſome things; So doth the Devill: I have knowne ſome murtherers confeſſe they could never be quiet till they had done their deed of wickedneſſe; others under Temptati­ons to ſelf-murther, have confeſt the Devills impulſions were ſo ſtrong that they could not reſiſt them. The Devill alwayes moves ſinners, and is often labouring with the Saints, but ſometimes he moves more faintly, ſome­times more ſtrongly. Even as the holy Spirit alwayes moves the Saints to good, but the Saints ſometimes are bound in the ſpirit ſo moved that they can doe nothing till the thing be done; the Devill moved David (a man according to Gods own heart,〈…〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉Dirigendo. to a ſinne, a great ſinne. 1 Chron. 21.1. It is the ſame word uſed: Job. 2.3.

4. As: ſometimes the ſpirit of God doth mani­feſt it ſelfe to his people by extraordinary direction upon ſeeking him in a doubtfull caſe. So doth the evill Spirit; a full inſtance of this we have in the Egyptians, and Caldeans and Romanes, ſending for their ſorcerers and wiſe men upon all occa­ſions to counſell them and they did ſo.

Suadendo:5. As the Spirit of God ſometimes extraor­dinarily manifeſts it ſelfe in creating perſwaſions and confidences in the hearts of his Saints concer­ning truth, and ſome things preſent or future, thus15 the Spirit ſeales our juſtification and faith and hope of glory, and hence it filleth the Soul with comfort; ſo the evill Spirit perſwades ſometime concerning errours and wickedneſſe, making impreſſions of perſwaſion and confidence upon the ſpirits of thoſe whom the Lord permits him to ſeduce: thus the evill Spirit perſwaded Ahab, 1 Kin. 21.21, 22. Thus I have ſhewen you how Satan workes either ordinarily, hardning the heart and polluting the ſoule, and drawing it out to ſinne, or extraordinarily in his ſervants and children, enlightning their minds ſtrange­ly, revealing to them things to come by extra­ordinary motions and impulſions, and directi­ons, and by creating extraordinary confiden­ces, and perſwaſions of things preſent or future. And having this phyſicall power of working, though the wicked be his ordinary ſubject, yet by Gods permiſſion when he gives up formall profeſſors to ſtrong deluſions, or when he would try his Saints, he may play theſe tricks with the Saints, they being his higheſt tempta­tions, God thereby proving them and others, 13 Deu. 1.2, 3. this is my third〈…〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the devil is Gods Ape.

4. Fourthly,Sunt enim dae­mones quos pios appelles, ad tem­pla hi compel­lunt, ad preces adigunt ſed ſuo lure. Drexel. t. 4. c. 3. ſuch is the ſubtilty of Satan the tempter, that as he will ſute all perſons with temptations ſutable to their naturall and mo­rall diſpoſitions, ſo he doth the Saints of God.

5. Fifthly, The Genius of the Saints being ſancti­fied, and ſtanding towards neare communion with God and his ſpirit, there cannot be a more ſutable18 temptation to them, then if the Devill can turne him­ſelfe into an Angell of light, and counterfeit the Spi­rit of God in its great workings to their ſoules: and make their ſoules take impreſſions, and reve­lations, and illuminations, and perſwaſions, and direction from him and his evill Spirit, inſtead of the holy Spirit.

6. Nor can there be a more dangerous temptation, or more dreadfull ſinne, then for the Soule to re­ceive impulſions and directions from Satan, and obey them; to receive impreſſions and perſwaſions from the Devill, and believe them, as if they came from the holy Spirit; and to call ſuch irradiations, perſwaſions, impulſions, the appearances and manifeſtations of the bleſ­ſed Spirit. For thus:

1. Faith and obedience, the two great homages of of the ſoule to God, are given to the Devill, his great enemy.

2. Thus all leud irregular actions and opinions which are the workes and doctrines of Devills, ſhall be fathered upon the holy Spirit in one of the higheſt degrees of blaſphemy.

Spirituum diverſa ſunt Genera: eſt Spiritus carnis, & mundi, & diaboli.And the holy one ſhall be entitled to blaſ­phemies againſt himſelfe, and actions of higheſt natures intendency, to the diſhonour of his ho­ly name.

7. Hence I conceive it is, That the Apoſtle bids us not believe every ſpirit, but try the ſpirits, whether they are of God, 1 Jo. 4.1. And the Theſſalonians are commanded not to be troubled by Spirit, or word, or Letter, 2 Theſſal. 2.1. And in regard19 that it is poſſible the Devil may enlighten, direct,Iam vero non facile arbitror poſſe diſcerni quando noſter ipſe loquitur ſpiritus, quan­ ve loquen­tem alterum audiat de trib••iis. Sed quid refert quicun­que loqu••udum unum & idem ſint? quod loquuntur, quid refert loquentis noſſe perſonam, dum conſtat penitioſum eſſe quod loquitur? D Bernardus ſerm. de ſep­tem ſpirit. ope­rum impr. Pa­rifii 1586. p. 491. perſwade, reveale things to come to the ſervants of God; and make his impreſſions upon their ſpi­rits, I conceive it one of the higheſt pieces of a Chriſtians duty, that hath, or heares of ſuch Re­velations, Illuminations, extraordinary impulſions, perſwaſions, and confidences, &c. to examine

From what Spirit they come, whether from his own Naturall Spirit: or Gods Holy Spirit, or this infernall Spirit.

And it would be a good work for ſome more eminent ſervants of God to undertake a Tract of this Nature, to deliver thoſe many that are taken in this ſnare, and cheated with this dreadfull cheat, I have not ability or roome to ſpeake much here; onely let me

1. Give you ſome few Generall notes, to know im­preſſions, revelations, perſwaſions, and directions, extraordinary impulſions, whether they come from God or the Devill.

2. I will diſcover a little concerning the Spirit of God, how farre it is ordinarily or extraordinarily a ſpirit of illumination to enlighten a Chriſtian in the underſtanding of the revealed things of God, and how it workes that worke in the Saints.

Whatſoever impreſſions that are made upon our ſpirits, either perſwading us of any notion,1. Rule. Ex parte mate­riae inſpiratae conſidera an viſiones & re­velationes, & quicquid tibi inſpiratur ſit conſentantum divinis literis. or of the warrantableneſſe of any action; or whatſoever impreſ­ſions of direction are made upon them: or whatſoever impulſions or ſtrong motions we finde in them, to be­lieve or doe any thing contrary to the word of God, cannot come from the ſpirit of God: whether it be18 contrary to any particular precept, Nam ſi non fuerit, ſcire debes non eſſe inſpira­tionem divi­nam, ſed illu­ſionem daemonis; Ʋnde Chriſtus ſalvaor omnes tentationes ſibi à daemont in deſer­to factas quia non congruebant cum divinis li­teris teſtimoniis ca undem rejicit. Buſidus. 〈…〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. p. 133. or any ge­nerall precept, or the ſcope of it. The Reaſon is plaine, becauſe the holy Spirit cannot ſay, and unſay like men, men are lyars, that is a ſpi­rit of Truth. Now all Scripture, ſaith the Apo­ſtle, was writ by Divine Inſpiration: Holy men wrote as they were inſpired by an holy Spirit. If therefore thou heareſt others ſay, that the Spirit hath perſwaded them that their ſoules are in a ſafe condition, and yet thou ſeeſt their lives ſuch as the Scripture ſpeakes, children of wrath: or if thou heareſt others vent notions for truths: and pretend the Spirit hath told them ſo: and thou findeſt their notions contra­ry to the word of God; Sciat me illud Apoſtoli libenter audire; Omnia probate, quod bonum eſt retinere; & ſal­vatoris verba docentis eſtote probati nummu­latu, ut ſiquis nummus adulcer eſt & figuram Caeſaris non ha­bt nec ſignatus eſt moneta pub­licae, reprobetur. D. Hieron. t 1. ep. 152. p. 375. H If thou heareſt of, or ſeeſt any doing ſtrange unſcripturall actions, and then pretend the ſpirits impreſſions, ſug­geſtions, impulſions, and the things are contra­ry to Scripture, or if thou findeſt in thy ſelfe a ſtrong perſwaſion, or impulſion, or motion of this nature, and thou thinkeſt it comes from the Spirit, know, they that ſay ſo, blaſpheme the true and holy and pure Spirit; and thou art under an high temptation to blaſpheme that Spirit, if thou findeſt thy ſelfe inclined to be­lieve ſuch Notions truth, or that the Spirit of God gives thee any ſuch directions, or puts thee upon any ſuch actions. Take for this two ſcrip­tures, Iſa. 8.20. To the Law, and to the Teſtimony, if thy Notions,V. Valdeſſo di­vinae conſid. conſid 86. Impulſions, Motions, Perſwaſions, be not according to that, there is no light in them, no, they come from the ſpirit of darkneſſe. Take19 yet another plaine Scripture concluding this caſe, 1 Io. 4.1, 2. Beloved, believe not every ſpirit,Senſus ver­borum Apoſtoli eſt, non temere omnibus creden­dum eſſe, qui doctrinae ſuae ſpiritus ſancti authoritatem pretexunt. Id ſi demonſtra­re velint dei verbum profe­rant oportet; quoſi deſtituun­tur, varis erit omnium quorum teſtimoniis ni­tuntur autho­tas. Memorabilis omnino & diligenti conſideratione dign ſſimus locus. Ʋoluit autem paucis verbis univerſa Chriſti myſteria comprehendere Iohannes. V. Gualtherum ad loc. but try the ſpirits whether they are of God, becauſe ma­ny falſe Prophets are gone into the world, hereby know yee that the ſpirit is of God. Every ſpirit that confeſ­ſeth that Jeſus Chriſt is come in the fleſh is of God. v. 3. And every ſpirit that confeſſeth not that Jeſus Chriſt is come in the fleſh, is not of God, &c.

Whence I gather: 1. That the motions, impul­ſions, perſwaſions which we have, are to be tryed whether they be of God, for there may be ſuch not from God. 2. That all ſuch motions, impulſions, perſwaſions, &c. as are contrary to the great truths of the Goſpell are not of God.

From whence it is plaine, that a pretended Spirit is not to be believed againſt a written word: indeed we have two caſes in Scripture contrary to this, God moved Abraham to ſacri­fice his ſonne, Gen. 22. and that other of Phine­has killing Zimri and Cosbi, contrary to the revealed will of God:V. Dr. Willet, in Gen 22. v. 1. before the Law in Cains caſe, and after the Floud to Moah, Gen. 9.6. and under the Law, to that Commandement, thou ſhalt doe no Murther. Many things are ſaid by the learn'd in both caſes, I thinke a little will ſerve the turne. Had not holy Wit reveal'd to us Gods immediate command for the firſt, and his immediate approbation of both, we could have ſaid neither of them had come from Gods holy Spirit.

22

But Secondly, If we thinke we have a moti­on to any thing that is beſides the word of God,Poſteri ſugiant & deteſtentur revelationem novarum doctri­narum & cuſto­dians manda­tum illud coele­ſt. Hunc audite, id eſt, Evange­liſtas, Apoſtolos; Hos legani & audiant Quod ſi praeter hoc ali­quid revelatur, oportet ut ha­beat analogiam fidei, ut ſit reve­latio intell ctus Scripturae, alio qui eſt diabolica. Luther. loc. com. cl. 4. c. 20. that motion or impulſion is very ſuſpicious, the reaſon is this, becauſe the word is a light to our feet, and there is no action of man, but if it be lawfull, it is commanded or allowed by ſome Generall or particular precept, the word is a ſufficient rule; and if I thinke my action is a caſe, there is no­thing about it in that Booke, this is my tempta­tion, and the Devil probably is about a deſigne, to draw me to an action againſt the word, and as his policy in order to effect that he tells me, my caſe is not to be found there, but I muſt ſeek for an immediate Revelation to this purpoſe, that he might meet me and reveale his mind to me. Rom. 14.23. Whatſoever is not of Faith is ſin, now not ſin or motion to it can be from God.

Faith muſt have Gods word for the Object, nor can any action be of Faith which is not done out of a praevious perſwaſion from the word of God that it is lawfull. If we be in the darke, as to an action, we may go ſeeke God, that his Spi­rit would ſhew us his rule in his word, but I would never truſt any voyce of the Spirit that ſhould not be ſeconded by the word, though I could ſee nothing in the word plainely forbid­ding me.

3. We may judge of the pretended, motions, inſpirations, revelations, &c. much from the per­ſons that pretend to have them, and here I ſhall give you a note or two: Conſider:

1. If the perſons be any way diſtempered in their23 braine in ſome fits of phrenſy or the like, if they be,V. Gul. Patiſi­enſem. 2. par. de Univerſo p. 3. c. 13. p 981. 4. col. & p. 989. c. 18. they may meerely come from their diſorde­red naturall Spirit or from the Devill, and ſo if they be much gone in melancholy, the Devill oft-times abuſeth ſuch tempers, their naturall Spi­rits being moſt diſpoſed to it, yet melancholy is often made Gods ſervant too: but in ſuch caſes the impreſſion or perſwaſion is very diſ­putable.

2. If the perſon be a woman, the Revelation or impreſſion is alſo very diſputable (ſaith Euſaeus) and truly I thinke not without cauſe, for you finde Gods Revelations to women very rare in the old Teſtament, in this extraordinary way. I meane it of extraordinary impreſſions by way of prediction; or counſell and direction, or the like; for ſuch impreſſions as tend to the private ſalvation of the ſoule, doubtleſſe women have them as frequently as men.

But for any other they are very ſuſpicious (ſaith Buſaeus) ever ſince Eves time.

3. Such motions impreſſions,Eas vero cogita­tiones quae juſti­tiae & veritatis nos admonent tota devotione ſuſcipientes di­vinae d gnationi gratiam habea­mus. Bernar. t. 1. 493. B. and perſwaſi­ons, &c. are very ſuſpicious, if made to wicked and profane men, if the Lord thus diſcovers him­ſelfe to any, theſe are his ſecrets, and Pſal. 25.14. The ſecret of the Lord is with them that feare him. The Spirit of God may make impreſſions upon the ſpirits of wicked men &c. move them but to what? To Faith and Repentance. The Spirit of God hath no neare intimate com­munion with thoſe that feare him not; yet two inſtances we have in Scripture (if no more)24 of Gods revealing himſelfe to men of whoſe piety we have no Evidence, to Pharoah, Gen. 41. and to Nebuchadnezzar, in Daniel: Dr. Willet anſwers theſe very well:Willet, in Gen. 41. q. 7. that Joſeph and Daniel had the Revelation, not Pharoah and Nebuchad­nezzar: they onely ſaw ſights and could make nothing of them. 2. God indeed for his owne wiſe ends, did to theſe great Princes manifeſt himſelfe in viſions, that they might be better friends to his Church,V. Pareum ad Gen. 41.25. but they were no ordi­nary perſons, neither was Gods minde inter­preted to them.

4. Fourthly, Impreſſions and revelations, and impulſions &c. comming in extraordinary obſolete wayes,Significat non amplius eſſe cau­ſam cur expe­ctationem novae revelationis ſimus ſuſpenſi. Calv. ad loc. are very ſuſpicious. The Apoſtle ſaith, God who at ſundry times and in divers manners ſpake in times paſt unto the Fathers by the Prophets, Hath in theſe laſt dayes ſpoken to us by his Son, Heb. 1. v. 1, 2. God was wont of old, before his word was fully written, to ſpeake by viſions and dreames: but now his word is a full rule; and he ſeldome ſpeakes any other way. It is a great queſtion, whether God now ſpeakes to any of his Saints by viſions or dreames. Smnia ſunt fa­tu••veritates Alexanderb Alex. Non debemus expectare reve­lationem vel ex­ternam vel in­ternam ubi mi­niſterium adeſt. Luther. loc. com. cl. 4. p. 35. The Poets tell us of Som­nia Eburnea et Cornea; the Schoolmen of Somnia divina, Phyſica, Diabolica. Experience tels us, that Alexander ab Alexandro was miſtaken, when he told us, dreames are truths to come: and Ari­ſtotle argues againſt divine dreames. All deter­mine, it is a very hard matter to know an im­preſſion made by God in a dreame from one made by Satan, or ariſing from the vapours of25 a diſturbed body, and a diſordered head: God did thus heretofore reveale himſelfe, but now he hath ſpoken by his Son: Heare him.

Impreſſions, Impulſions, Motions, &c. comming from the holy Spirit, are but ſealings and impreſſions of ſome divine truth. Saint Auguſtine tells us, how in a conflict of ſpirit, not being able to gaine comfort from the Scripture, he ſet him­ſelfe to prayer; and he heard as it were a voyce fromhe other roome, Take up and Read,Tolle & lege, Tolle & lege. take up and•••d: he tooke up the Bible, and Read; and from the firſt portion of Scripture he read, his Soule received comfort; it is very poſſible that a Chriſtian may think he heares the voyce of the Spirit immediately,Tantum audio conciones, lego Scripturam, & utor Sacramen­tis nullas appa­ritiones angelo­rum hab••. I­therus. foretelling him things to come, perſwading him of this or that truth, ſealing to him his hope in the Lord Jeſus, putting him upon ſome action. But if it be the voyce of the Spirit, it ſayes, Take up and Read; it directs him to ſome promiſe which he clo­ſeth with for comfort, or to ſome prophecy, which it perſwades him of the fulfilling of; or to ſome precept, to the practiſe of which it ob­ligeth him; and ſealeth unto him a true and congruous interpretation of that Scripture, which ſhall not croſſe other Scriptures, nor the Analogy of Faith.

Impreſſions made upon Chriſtians ſpirits concer­ning things to come ſhall undoubtedly come to paſſe, if they come from Gods ſpirit: for that is omniſci­ent, and doth not worke in us perſwaſions of a lye. But they may come to paſſe, and yet not be26 wrought by Gods ſpirit; that this is ſo, is plaine, Deut. 13. 1, 2, 3. and the Reaſon is plaine; be­cauſe the Devill certainly knowes many things that ſhall come to paſſe, being in their naturall neceſſary cauſes, and can gueſſe at more, by his vaſt knowledge of all motions and tranſlations paſt, and being in the world, of all humours and diſpoſitions of people and their ſeverall counſels, &c.

7. Seventhly, I conceive that Impreſſio••made upon our Spirit after prayer are not alwayes〈◊〉tru­ſted. It is generally thought that thoſe that ſeek God, if after prayer they find impreſſions to do the action, concerning which they enquire of him, theſe muſt be lookt upon as comming from the holy Spirit. I humbly conceive this may be a groſſe miſtake in theſe caſes.

Paſtum feci cum domino deo meo ne vel viſi­ones vel ſom­nia, vel etiam Angelos mihi mittet. Conten­tus enim ſum hoc dono quod habeo Scriptu­ram ſanctam quae abunde do­cet & ſuppedi­tat omnia quae ſunt neceſſaria cum ad hanc tum ad futuram vitam. Luther. If a Chriſtian, having a ſufficient rule in Gods word, to guide or forbid him, ſhall yet either neg­lecting to looke that out, or not being willing to follow it, go and aſke counſell of God, whe­ther or no he ſhould do an action which God hath in his word plainly forbidden him to doe, this is like Balaams going to God to know whether he ſhould curſe Jſrael or no. I conceive we muſt looke the word, to know what to doe in an acti­on, and then ſeek God to guide us in the doing; and for the matter of our actions we are onely to ſeek God, to ſhew us his mind in his word.

Secondly, in caſe an action be to me doubtfull, that I cannot ſee the word directing me to, nor forbidding me expreſſely; but I think there are27 ſome generall rules, which I thinke may warrant me; and I upon that goe and ſeek the Lord, it may be after my firſt prayer, I find my ſpirit re­lucting againſt it, and it may be ſome piece of Gods word ſeemes to me againſt it: yet for all this I am ſo byaſſed to the action, that I will go ſeeke God againe, this is now a tempting God; and in ſuch a caſe the Lord may give the Devill leave to give a man his anſwer, as in Balaams caſe.

Thus Chriſtian! I have given thee ſome rules by which thou mayeſt know whence thoſe motions, impreſſions, ſuggeſtions, impul­ſions, perſwaſions, which thy ſelfe or others have come, whether from the ſpirit of God,Valdeſſo con­ſid. 25. or no. I finde ſome other notes given by Valdeſſo and others: But not being, as I conceive cer­taine, I have omitted them. This was a taſke fitter for a more able head and pen, then mine (Chriſtians) but I may ſay as Elihu, Job. 32.6, 7. I ſaid I am young and you are very old, wherefore I was afraid and durſt not ſhew you my opinion; I ſaid dayes ſhould ſpeake, and multitude of yeares ſhould teach wiſdom: But there is a ſpirit in man, and the in­ſpiration of the Almighty gives him underſtanding. I expected that ſome of my Reverend Fathers ſhould have diſcuſſed this neceſſary point, and appeared in the vindication of the moſt holy Spirit, I waited long, but I ſaw none: But con­tinually heard of leud opinions, and vile acti­ons father'd upon the holy Spirit, as the per­ſwader of them and inſtigatour to them: this28 this made me, that for the Lords ſake, and for his Spirits ſake, and for the precious ſoules ſake of many of Gods Saints, I could be no longer ſilent; to heare men foretell things to come, vent errours and Blaſphemous and ridiculous and erroneus opinions, and father them upon the Spirit.

Nor may the heterogeneus nonſenſicall in­terpretations of Scripture, which come in theſe dayes from many that pretend to be Saints, be with leſs blaſphemy father'd upon the Spirit of God; I come therefore now cloſer to the mat­ter, to ſpeake of the Spirit, how far it aſſiſts the Servants of God, in the interpretation of Scrip­ture: and how a man may be knowne to have had his guidance in interpretations of Scrip­ture from Gods moſt holy Spirit, in order to which obſerve as truths.

1. That all Scripture was of divine inſpiration, holy men ſpake as they were inſpired by God, ſaith the Apoſtle.

2. That all Scripture being dictated by the Spirit, the Spirit of God is beſt able to interpret it, and to guide others in the interpretation of it.

3. That in the want of meanes, and to ſupply the neceſſities of the Church, in the primitive times.

God was pleaſed miraculouſly and immediatly, enabling ſome that were illiterate, and not at all verſed in the ſtudy of the Scriptures, to know his meaning in the deep miſeries of them that they could not onely foretell things to come, but alſo eminently open and infallibly29 expound Scripture: and this was that prophe­cying ſpoken of in the new Teſtament, 1 Cor. 12. ch. 13. ch. 14. and was an extraordinary manifeſtation of the ſpirit, by which God ſup­plyed the neceſſities of his Church in thoſe firſt times: this continued from the dayes of Pen­tecoſt ſome yeares, and decreaſeowards the latter end of the Apoſtles dayes,〈◊〉is not to be expected now.

4. That the ſpirit of God (now dwelling in all the Saints) doth enable them ſo farre to un­derſtand the meaning of God in his holy word, as is neceſſary to their Salvation; and by its ſpeciall worke in the Saints, gives them a reflex, ſpeciall knowledge, that the promiſes are their portion, and Chriſt is theirs, ſhewing them their particular right, upon their hearing of the word Preached or Reading of it, or ſeeking him by prayer: yet this latter it doth not conſtantly, but ſometimes.

5. That in the underſtanding of the meaning of the Letter of Scripture, the Spirit of God doth by a common worke, helpe thoſe that with humble hearts waite upon him for ſuch aſſi­ſtance.

6. That this helpe of the Spirit is added to the uſe of meanes, and given us ſo; ſuch meanes as are the knowledge of Tongues, ſtudying the Scriptures, prayer, comparing Scripture with Scripture; and not by immediate inſpiration, without meanes.

7. That thus the Spirit helps, by enlightning our underſtandings and judgements, raiſing up our30 naturall parts, bringing to remembrance what we have heard, paralell Scriptures, or the like.

8. That although the Spirit in the uſe of meanes doth thus helpe us: yet not by ſuch an in­fallible helpe, as a Chriſtian may alwayes be aſſu­red he doth not miſtake, though ſometimes he may have〈◊〉a full perſwaſion, much leſſe ſo as he may〈◊〉ver his judgement to others as infallible; except they ſee it agree with other Scripture.

Nunquam enim Deus fortunat laborem eorum qui non ſunt vo­cati & quan­quam quaedam ſalutaria ad ſe­rant, tamen ni­hil aedificant. Lutherus. 9. That the Spirit of God in this way of aſſiſt­ance doth moſt accompany, and may be moſt expected of thoſe, who moſt uſe appointed meanes, and who are called of God to this publike worke; the Spirit of God being moſt promiſed to ſuch and uſing to aſſiſt all in their callings and things neceſſary for them: not thoſe who act out of the ſphere that God hath ſet them in.

10. That thoſe that do uſe means, and are by office to interpret Scriptures, and are learned, may not have the aſſiſtance of the Spirit, through their owne negligence, or curioſity, or neglect of ſeeking God, or want of an humble heart in ſerving God, and ſeeking of him, all this, Chriſtian, is truth, and old puritaniſme.

But now this is that which is denyed.

1. That the Spirit of God, which dwells in all the Saints by vertue of that inhabitation, doth inable the Saints to underſtand the Scriptures, ſo as to be able to expound them to others.

2. That the Spirit of God doth by any ſuch im­mediate way helpe Chriſtians to underſtand Scrip­tures,31 as he did helpe the Saints in primitive times by by the guift of prophecy.

3. We deny, That the ſpirit of God, in times when the meaning of his word may be underſtood by meanes, doth inable the Saints without meanes, (yea and out of their callings too) to expound the holy Scriptures to publike auditories; indeed were there a caſe of neceſſity, that the Church of Chriſt could not be ſupplyed otherwiſe but by ſome that could not uſe due meanes to gaine the meaning of Scriptures, the aſſiſtance of the ſpi­rit might then be lookt for in an extraordinary way, but when there is no ſuch neceſſity but God hath liberally ſupplyed his people with meanes, both to gaine the knowledge of Scrip­tures, and ordaining ſome to that office, we de­ny that any have any promiſe for any ſuch ex­traordinary aſſiſtance, nor have any ſuch gran­ted to them: This is that I deny.

Now every errour, Chriſtian, is founded upon a miſtake of ſome truth, an Errour, being a mon­ſtrous production, being begotten by the Devil upon a crotchecall head, or an ignorant head and a proud heart: and as every monſter hath ſomething of the ſpecies which it repreſents, in reſpect of which it is either deficient or redun­dant, ſo hath every Errour. The truth's ſome­thing of the ſpecies whereof is kept in this Er­rour, thou haſt heard, and alſo wherein this ap­peares to be a monſter, being a redundancy to thoſe truths, and ſomething more then they hold forth.

32

And indeed it is neceſſary that one of thoſe three laſt mentioned ſhould be held (as a ſub­ſtratum) to this irregular practice of unordained mens Preaching. For if we ſhould lay that truth aſide, that all that publikely Preach muſt be in office, and onely hold the other, That all that ex­pound Scripture muſt have a guift and ability to doe it, (which Mr Sheppard grants) yet we ſhould have enough againſt the Preaching of the moſt, and one of a thouſand Chriſtians would ſcarce be found fit according to that to be a Preacher, if we ſtill hold this truth.

That this guift is not common to all Saints by ver­tue of the ſpirit given them, viz. the ſanctifying ſpi­rit, but onely given by the uſe of meanes, by the ſtudy­ing of Scripture, weighing the Originall, conſidering paralell Scriptures, weighing coherences and conſe­quences, ſtill it will follow,

That thoſe onely may preach who are enabled to doe this, who can ſearch the Originals, conſider paralell Scriptures, and judge if they be paralells; who can un­derſtand and weigh coherences and conſequences, &c. and this would argue very few guifted men fitting. Being neither:

1. Inabled to allow themſelves times to do it, nor yet,

2. Having naturall or acquired abilities to do it, if they had time; therefore it ſtood Mr. Sheppard in hand to maintaine the other notions: That they have an immediate aſſiſtance to it by the Spirit, dwel­ling in them as Saints. An opinion as much ridi­culous as dangerous; for if this were true, then as I have urged,

331. None but ſuch, as have the ſpirit thus dwelling in them and are Saints, could give a true interpretati­on of any portion, the contrary to which is evi­dently true.

2. No Saint could erre, in any interpretation of Scripture or application of it; why? becauſe this act of his proceeds from the immediate vertue of an unerring Spirit. Thus ſhould nonſenſicall and ridiculous interpretations of Scripture, which he that runs may read to be falſe, be fa­ther'd upon the ſpirit of God. And herein (Chriſtians) I cannot but obſerve how God hath made Mr. Sheppard to confute himſelfe; for you ſhal any of ye be Judges, whether an un­erring Spirit guided him when he interpreted James 4.5. to be the holy Spirit dwelling in us, and applied it to that purpoſe.

And the like I might ſay of forty Scriptures he hath brought and applyed in his Booke, that have no kind of relation to the thing, he brings them to prove; take his Booke, examine the Scriptures he quotes, well obſerving for what he quotes them, and thou wilt finde it very true. Now I thinke it were no leſſe then blaſ­phemy for me to bring James 4.5. The Spirit that dwells in us luſteth to envy, to prove that the holy Spirit dwells in the Saints, if I ſhould ſay, The ſpirit guided me to that interpretation; Beſides,

3. Of neceſſity: A Saint (if this Doctrine be true) can never alter his opinion in any one Scrip­tures interpretation, for ſurely the Spirit can­not guide a man contrary to its owne former guidance.

344. If this guift comes from the ſpirit as the ſpirit that dwells in us; Every one in whom the ſpirit dwells muſt be able to expound Scripture to others. In ſhort, Chriſtians, ſo many groſſe abſurdities would follow this poſition as would eaſily evidence it to be as farre from truth as hell is from heaven. And yet if our brethren cannot ſay this, they can ſay nothing at all to juſtifie their abilities to expound Scriptures, and ſo conſequently their practice in it.

Now that I might vindicate the holy Spirit from being the author of thoſe lamentable wreſtings of Scripture, nonſenſicall interpreta­tions, and abſurd ſenſes which many put upon it, I have undertaken this diſcourſe, one thing more eſpecially moving me.

6. The dangerous conſequences, which, I apprehend, would be of this opinion and practice, and eſpecially at this time, I ſhall mention but a few.

1. A dangerous puffing up of Chriſtians, with the opinion of their own parts and abilities, no Schollers are ſo proud as thoſe that have leaſt Scholerſhip;Hoc tantum ſcio me nihil ſcire. Non eſt calami­toſior homo in terris quam ſuperbus Doctor, Rex, Princeps. Lutherus. men of knowledge ſee ſuch a vaſt knowledge before them, that it makes them cry out, they know nothing, nor any Chriſtian ſo ready to be puft up with a conceit of their own knowledge as thoſe that know leaſt; thoſe that have rare abilities to expound Scripture ſee ſo many difficulties, and meet with ſo many conſiderable queſtions and objections, that it makes them judge themſelves very inſufficient to this great work, who is ſufficient for ſuch things?35 obſerve (Chriſtians) where there are ſuch prea­chers, whether thou doeſt not ordinarily ſee them men puft up with ſelfe conceit and opi­nions of themſelves, thinking no texts too hard for them to open, no difficulties too hard to unty.

2. We live in an age when the worſt of men are much prejudiced againſt the wayes of God and his Goſpell Ordinances, and in which many ſuch men there are that are very learned and criticall. Now whether this be a probable way to ingratiate the Ordinances of God to people, to ſend out Preachers, that through want of abilities ſhall make the Ordinances of God nauſeous to car­nall hearts, let any prudent Chriſtians Judge. Surely in ſuch times thoſe ſhould be ſent out who are of moſt eminent Abilities, and furni­ſhed even with humane Art, to perſwade in the moſt moving way, and to inſinuate themſelves into the hearts of their hearers, otherwiſe the Ordinances of God ſhall yet be made more contemptible. And for ordinary people, how much they are prejudiced againſt the wayes of God, all know; and whether it be a way to pro­pagate the Goſpell of Chriſt amongſt them, to ſend out ſuch whom they have formerly known to be of their own ranke or below them, let experience witneſſe; when Jeſus Chriſt himſelfe (who ſurely had better guifts then our brethren have) preached where the people could ſay, Is not this the Carpenters ſon? the ſon of Mary, the brother of James and Joſes, and36 of Judas and Simon, and are not his ſiſters here with us? Mar. 6.3. It is ſaid v. 5. Jeſus Chriſt could do there no mighty workes, ſave that he laid his hands upon a few ſick perſons and healed them, whereupon he went downe into the Villages and preach't; and ſhall we thinke they are likely to be great Inſtru­ments in doing good? When the people ſhall ſay, Is not this the Cobler that mended our boots the other day? or rather will it not be a way to har­den people in their contempt of the Lords Or­dinances.

3. Thirdly, doe we not live in a time, when Chriſtians are growne to a very high degree of know­ledge, that ordinary notions will not ſerve their curi­ous palats, They muſt have good ſauſe as well as meat, and all that Miniſters can doe by their moſt elaborate judicious Sermons is ſcarce e­nough to keep alive in Chriſtians a good opini­on of Ordinances; and will it not be a ready meanes to make them wholly to ſlight them, to have their eares continually tyred with raw, and indigeſted Notions and vaine tautologies, with diſcourſes in which ſhall be nothing to win the affections,Doctores non ſolum aedificare, ſed etiam deſen­dere debent. Tempore pacis docendum eſt. Belli autem tempore pug­nandum & reſiſtendum Sa­tanae ac haereti­cis. Lutheri loc. com. cl. 4. p. 34. and entice the hearers eare?

4. Doe we not live in times in which the Socinian and Arminian hereſies are ſpread over the Nation; that there is ſcarce any body of profeſſors but ſome or other of them are poyſoned with this leaven? And is this a time to ſend out ſuch woodden inſtruments to deale with them? will a guifted brother that hath no learning, nor any way im­proved his reaſon be able to graple wth a ſubtil37 headed Socinian; or rather ſhall he not (proba­bly) be ſeduced by him into his Blaſphemies?

5. Will not this practice make way to render the office of the Miniſtry uſeleſſe, and the Ordinance of Ordination uſeleſſe? For to what purpoſe ſhould theſe continue, if it be every ones duty to Preach as well as they; nay, & in time thus ſhall all the Ordinances of God be made uſeleſſe, for they that bring arguments to prove this, may if they will bring better from this conceſſion to prove they may baptize and give the Lords Supper, and then what need of officers for any?

I might inſtance in many more, but in ſhort my apprehenſions are ſuch, that I believe, if the Devill were to aſke a Courteſie of a State, he ſhould aſke no more then, 1. An univerſall tole­ration, and 2. an uncontrouled liberty for every one to Preach and expound Scriptures.

By an univerſall toleration he ſhould get a pro­tection for his friends he hath already;By the firſt the divel would ſecure his ſer­vants from the Sword of the Magiſtrates; by the ſecond from ſword of argument, the two edged ſword of the word. by this libertas prophetandi he would make more un­learned men wreſting the Scriptures to their owne deſtruction, and the deſtruction of them that heare him. If he could but procure theſe two things, he ſhould have the Magiſtracy in a ſnare for neglect of their duty in reference to the truth and glory and ordinance of Chriſt, he would have the Miniſtry under his feet (thoſe great troublers of his Kingdome) yea and the third part of the ſtarres of Heaven would be drawne downe, being by this meanes ſeduced into er­rour, or carried up above ordinances, and he38 would harden the hearts of others againſt the meanes of Grace. My ſoule trembles to thinke what the iſſue of Either or both theſe will be. The Purity and truth of Ordinances would be loſt, and the power of Godlineſſe loſt too. I ſay the firſt will be loſt; the Ordinance of Ordination gone? have we been ſo zealous againſt a trifling ceremony, Chriſtians, becauſe it hath not been commanded, and ſhall it be now ſo light a thing to us to make the commands of the Goſpell (yea ſo many as are for ordination) of no effect? Have we ſtrained at a Gnat, & ſhall we ſwallow theſe Camels? have we been ſo zealous againſt an Apocryphall Biſhop or Arch-biſhop, and ſhal we ſo tamely admit thoſe things which are far more Apocryphall? ſhall any dare to ſay that a private Perſons ſprinkling water upon the face, and naming the holy Trinity is that Ordinance of Baptiſme? or the breaking a bit of Bread, and powring out a little Wine (uſing the words of adminiſtration) by the ſame hand, the great Ordinance of the Lords Supper? and is their prophecying (as they call it) any more the great Ordinance of Preaching? no ſure, thus ſhall Ordi­nances be all one after another laid aſide. And for the power of godlineſſe (deare Chriſtians!) looke into other places where there hath beene an univerſall toleration, and ſee how much of it thou findeſt there. In ſhort, Chriſtians, you can remember the time when the Miniſters of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt Preach'd the Goſpell power­fully and plainely; and Chriſtians heard it re­verently39 and humbly, and were wont in their families to repeat and examine Sermons, to ſearch the Scriptures for the truth of thoſe things which the Miniſters ſaid, were not the Chriſtians of thoſe times noble Bereans? did not the power of Godlineſſe thrive under this or­der? were there not more ſoules converted by farre then now; were not thoſe Chriſtians more humble, ſincere, cordiall, united, ſound Chriſti­ans then thoſe of our times? had we not more Chriſtians when we had fewer Preachers? and ſince this unbridled liberty hath beene taken, have not Chriſtians beene more looſe and wan­ton, more crotchicall, and ſcepticks rather then Chriſtians? O that the Lord would pleaſe to teach his people ſobriety to diſtinguiſh be­tween the budding rods, and thoſe that he doth not make to bloſſome.

I confeſſe (Chriſtians!) I was the unfitteſt of ten thouſand to undertake this great contro­verſie, not onely in reſpect of my few dayes and little abilities of learning and Judgement, but in regard of my much work, it is now but four­teene dayes ſince this Authors Booke came to my ſight or hands, and I have had the taſke of ſeven Sermons to ſtudy and Preach in the time, ſo that thou canſt not expect I ſhould have ap­proved my ſelf very exact in my anſwer, which was diſpatched in ten dayes (my Preface ha­ving taken up the other foure.) But I could not hold my peace (not for my owne ſake) for I durſt have truſted the weakeſt judgements to40 have judged betwixt Mr. Sheppard and me, whether he had ſufficiently anſwered my ar­guments, but for the Lords ſake, and for his glo­ry ſake, and for his truths ſake and Saints ſake: and for his glorious Ordinances ſake, that they might not be trampled under foot; I ſay for theſe cauſes I have undertaken this Gentle­man. And now I beſeech you (deare and pre­tious friends) in this day of reproach, to wit­neſſe to the ordinance of the Lord Jeſus. This Gentleman hath ſo farre appeared for the Lord as to plead with people to maintaine the great Ordinance of the Miniſtry. The Lord make him in that to prevaile with them. Severall things the Devill hath deviſed in theſe ſinfull times to prejudice the Spirits of Chriſtians againſt the Miniſters of the Goſpell that are the meſ­ſengers of the Lord to their ſoules,Non amo te Sabidi nec poſ­ſum dicere qua­re: Hoc tantum poſſum dcere non amo te. yea, againſt thoſe of whom they cannot ſay, they have ei­ther complied with the ſuperſtitions of former times, or that their converſation is not as be­comes the Goſpell of the Lord Jeſus; they can onely ſay this againſt them, that they care not for them.

But I ſay ſome things there are that the De­vill hath put into ſome profeſſors mouths to defend their revilings of them, and ſhamefull contempt caſt upon them.

1. Firſt, They are diſaffected to the State, I could not but obſerve this great ſubtilty of Satan, when Church differences through much wai­ting and many diſputes were almoſt brought41 together to finde out this new way to divide. But my deare friends! is this enough thinke you, to juſtifie not hearing the Miniſters of the Goſpel, or laying them aſide. Bleſſed be God that un­happy cauſe of diviſion is almoſt now taken away. But was there nothing that in poynt of conſcience might ſtumble the Miniſters of God in reference to our great change? or were all Saints that were moſt complying? I ſpeake not for my ſelfe, I confeſſe I was from the firſt more ſatisfied in poynt of Engaging, then many of my Reverend fathers, but I could not but from the firſt thinke, and ſtill doe thinke hundreds of them that durſt not, were more conſcientious then my ſelfe, and had the feare of God more upon them then my ſinfull ſoule hath, and were I either in Parliament or Army, I truſt I ſhould the more love and honour that man for ever, whom I ſhould obſerve holy and conſcientious in all his wayes for oppoſing me, and venturing any frownes to doe it, where he obſerved me doing any thing that he in conſcience ſhould thinke I did amiſſe in, though I were fully ſa­tisfied I did not. But I hope that buſineſſe is determined by the great God, O that no grud­ges for differences relating to it might yet re­maine, but that there might be in all that feare the Lord an heart of Oblivion as well as an Act of Oblivion is paſt in it.

2. A Second great objection againſt the Mi­niſters is: they are Preſbyterians, and the Devill hath ſo far prevailed with many as to make it42 in their hearts Anathema eſſe Preſbyterum. It hath beene the lot of the Saints heretofore to be ſtigmatized with Apocryphall names, Lollards, Hugonites, Calviniſts, Puritanes, Non conformiſts, yet they bare their names with Glorying, becauſe it was for the Lords ſake. Bleſſed be God that he hath now taught our enemies a Scripture name: Presbyter is a name of the Lords owne coyning. Tit. 1.5. 1 Pet. 5.1. 2 Ep. Jo. v. 1. 3 Ep. v. 1. &c. I confeſſe Chriſtians that name next the name of Chriſtian is my glory, and the next Scripture name for the Miniſters of the Goſpell and officers of the Church. After that way which they call Preſbytery, I deſire to wor­ſhip the Lord Jeſus Chriſt in Goſpell-order. And if this be to be vile, we muſt be more vile: we can­not but looke upon Paſtors, Elders, and Deacons, to be the Church officers under the Goſpell, and thinke that the government of the Church is to be in ſuch hands, and that Synods are Gods Or­dinance to which Churches ought to be ſubject, and that errors and hereticks are not to be endured, nor publike Ordinances to be adminiſtred by pri­vate hands, nor the great Ordinance of the ſupper to be given out promiſcuouſly, and theſe are the great things that Preſbyterians differ in, both from ſome of their diſſenting brethren, and the Epiſcopall party; and whether this charge will be enough to juſtifie your hatred of the Mini­ſters of the Goſpell, and dividings from them in the day of the Lord Jeſus (Chriſtians!) I be­ſeech you ſeriouſly to conſider.

433. But Thirdly, the Miniſters are bitter,Nos ſic ſapimus omnia prorſusſſe reprehen­denda, arguenda, conſundenda, ni­hil excuſandis ut medio ſtet campo libera, & aperta & pura veritas. Porro aliud eſt eos quos corri­pueris ſumma manſuetudine ſuſcipere, tolera­re, juvare. Hoc jam ad chari­tatis & officii exemplum per­tinet, non admi­niſterum verbi: charitas eſt quae omnia ſuſtinet, omnia ſuffert, omnia ſperat; fi­des vero ſeu verbum prorſus nihil ſuſtinet, ſed arguit, devo­rat, ſeu ut Jere­mias dicit, evel­lit, deſtruit, diſ­ſipat, & male­dictus qui facit opus domini fraudulenter. Lutherus loc. com. cl 4. p. 75. I could never yet underſtand this charge when a Mini­ſter might be ſaid to be bitter, or upon what ſcore this charge lies upon them; was not John Baptiſt ſo bitter when he called the Phariſees a generation of Vipers, and Jeſus Chriſt ſo bitter when he called them rotten painted Sepulchers? doe they reprove ſinne harſhly, and is it not their duty, to Cry aloud and not to ſpare? I would faine Fathome this Notion of bitterneſſe, when you have conſidered it, Chriſtians examine whether it be not Zeale in oppoſition to Luke­warmeneſſe, that you put this ſcandalous name upon: if it be knowne that whatſoever you thinke of it, they thinke it a dreadfull thing to be ſpued out of the Lords mouth, for being neither hot nor cold againſt hereſies and Er­rours, and for the glory of the Lord Jeſus. If I rightly underſtand this notion, it is this, ſuch a Miniſter is bitter, why, he inveighes ſharpely a­gainſt an opinion or practice which is mine, & I am perſwaded many Saints of God are of it. But Chriſtians! ſurely you will be aſhamed to own this before the Lord Jeſus hereafter, or in a diſ­courſe here. Is the Miniſter an holy conſcienti­ous man? doeſt thou thinke that he verily thinkes thy opinion or way is a ſinne: if thou doeſt, Chriſtian, ſurely thou ſhould'ſt love him that he will not ſpare thee: was not Jeſus Chriſt thus bitter when he ſaid to Peter, get thee behind me Satan, and Paul thus bitter when he rebuked Peter to his face? Could David ſay concerning a44 wretch that charged him with bloud and uſurpa­tion, when he ſo ſhamefully railed on him in the ſtreets, Let him alone perhaps God hath bidden him curſe? And if thou haſt an humble heart, ſhalt not thou ſay when an holy ſervant of God ſhall not raile, but from Scripture reprove, not in the ſtreets but in the Pulpit, where God hath ſet him to reprove ſinne, poſſibly God hath bidden him re­prove, poſſibly my ſoule may be guilty, however doubtleſſe he ſpeakes what he thinkes the Lord hath bidden him ſpeake. Let the righteous ſmite me and it ſhall be like oyle that ſhall not breake my head, yea it ſhall be a kindneſſe for yet my prayer alſo ſhall be in their calamities. Pſal. 141.5. Eſi me Lutherus Diabolum voca­ret, ego tamen illum inſignem dei ſervum ag­noſcam. Calv. Mr. Calvin heard that Luther rail'd on him, what ſayes he to it, ſayes he, though Luther ſhould call me a Devill, yet I would acknowledge him a famous ſervant of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt. But Calvins Doctrine and Spirit too is much forgotten.

4. But the Miniſters Preach nothing but damnation, they Preach legally and Preach nothing but duties, they ſhould Preach priviledges. Iſa. 30.8. Now go, write it before them in a Table, and note it in a Booke, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever. That this is a rebellious people, lying chil­dren, children that will not heare the law of the Lord, which ſay to the ſeers ſee not, and to the prophets pro­phecy not unto us right things, ſpeake unto us ſmooth things, prophecy deceits, get you out of the way, turne aſide out of the path, cauſe the holy one to ceaſe from be­fore us. There are no conſcientious Miniſters but will preach the priviledges of the Goſpell, but45 they know that there are a thouſand ſinners and hypocrites to ten true Saints,Read Mr. Shep­pards Sincere Convert. Mr. Hooker on humiliation. Mr. Fenners Books: and holy Rogers and Bolton. See if they did not preach terrours, as well as com­forts, yet who are now ſuch inſtruments of God to con­vert ſoules? they know there are many wanton looſe profeſſors to one ſtrict humble cloſe walking Chriſtian, and therefore they thinke it their duty to preach the Law as wel as the Goſpell, did not John Bap­tiſt preach law. Math. 3.7, 8, 9, 10. And Jeſus Chriſt preach law. Math. 25.41. And St. Paul write law to the Saints. Rom. 2. v, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. &c. and 2 Theſ. 1.10, 11. Profane perſons had need of law to humble them, and hypocrites to con­vince them, and looſe profeſſors to make them humble and ſtrict. But my Pen runs too farre. (Deare Chriſtians!) the Lord keep you hum­ble in theſe wanton dayes, and ſober in the midſt of this mad generation, and under an ho­ly aw of his precious ordinances in this day of their reproach, and tender of his Miniſters by whom you have beene brought in to Chriſt in this day of their contempt, and zealous for Chriſt Jeſus in this Lukewarme time. And the Lord Jeſus keepe you all blameleſſe to the day of his comming. This is the Prayer of,

Your meaneſt ſervant in the worke of the Lord Jeſus JOHN COLLINGS.
47

ANIMADVERSIONS By way of Reply, to a Book, entituled, The Peoples priviledge and duty guarded, By WILLIAM SHEPHARD, Eſq.

CHAP. I. Wherein the Authors method in his Anſwer is laid down.

AS this ſober Gentleman hath in his firſt Chapter ſet down his method: ſo I ſhall doe mine, that the Reader may not be tyred with an indiſtinct diſcourſe.

1. I ſhall examine his ſecond Chapter; and ſhew how far we have, or have not granted; and how we have granted what he there men­tions.

2. I ſhall examine his third Chapter (in ſeverall Chap­ters, becauſe it is very long:) there I ſhall examine whe­ther he hath ſufficiently proved his ten Propoſitions he layes as a foundation, or the eleventh; which is his main work. I ſhall examine the laſt more ſtrictly; and reply to his ſeverall (pretended) arguments, for the preaching of ſuch as are not in office.

483. I ſhall examine his fourth Chapter, where he anſwers our arguments: and try whether he hath done it ſuffici­ently; and reply upon his pretended anſwers.

4. Poſſibly I may adde ſome ſhort notes to his laſt Chapter, which is not argumentative, but onely practicall, and therefore I ſhall not ſpeak much to it.

CHAP. II. In which part of the Authors Second chapter is examined: and the Preachers grants are opened, how far, and in what ſenſe they have granted the things mentioned.

THe Author is pleaſed in the firſt Chapter to tell us, that he grants theſe things:

1. That that there are or ought to be in all the Churches of Chriſt regularly conſtituted, certain Officers call'd Preachers, Paſtors, Teachers, or Elders, &c.Eph. 4.11, 12. 1 Cor. 12.29, &c.

2. That no man may take this office upon him; but he that is called, and ſet apart to it, according to the Goſ­pel way and rule 1 Tim. 5 22. Lay hands ſuddenly on no man. Acts 13.3. When they had faſted and prayed, and layd their hands on them, they ſent them away.

So that he grants the Goſpel rule for Goſpel Preachers to be that thoſe that take the Office upon them ſhould be ſolemnly ſet a part by faſting and prayer, and impoſition of hands.

3. That theſe officers are to be heard, acknowledged, ſub­mitted to, honoured, maintained, countenanced, and furthered in their office by the people.1 Theſ. 5 12. Eph. 5.21, &c.

4. The opinion denying the Miniſtery, is as bad as that denying Magiſtracy: and both of them hereticall, dan­gerous, and damnable.
5. He grants, that the publique and common prea­ching49 the word by ſuch officers in the Church of Chriſt is the ſpeciall, and great ſtanding Ordinance of Chriſt now under the Goſpel for the gathering to, and perfecting Saints in the Church, there to continue to the worlds end, Eph. 4.11. Matth. 28.20. Rom. 10.17.

In the cloſe of that Chapter he ſaies:

We utterly diſlike therefore all opinions and practiſes that tend to the derogation or prejudice of this Office, Ordinance, and Miniſtry, which muſt be kept ſafe, and untouched; and we may not endure it to be ſpoken againſt. Thus much we grant to the Preachers.

(Sir,) Although we believe that Gods word doth ob­lige you to believe and grant this, and all this: yet we have cauſe to thank you, that in this erronious and back­ſliding age (wherein ſo many have loſt their firſt love) you will thus far bear witneſſe to the truth of God. This is much more then thoſe that uſually handle your ſub­ject will grant: and I ſuppoſe enough (if well improved) to bring you to cloſe with that other piece of truth, a­gainſt which you contend, viz. That Publique preaching the Goſpel amongſt profeſſors is a proper and diſtinct act of theſe Officers.

In this ſecond Chapter you come to tell us, what we have granted you, and there you confeſſe we grant you twelve things.

"1. That ſuch as have not been brought up in the Ʋniver­ſity, or want School-learning, may (being duely called) become publique preachers.

This indeed I have granted, in my Vindiciae, p. 14. but in theſe terms onely: that School-learning is not abſo­lutely neceſſary. So that doubtleſſe in caſes of neceſſity, when the Church of God cannot be ſupplied enough with men of learning, this may be done (and I conceive this is our caſe and part now) for truly, I judge a godly gifted man, duely ordained and ſet a part to the work (though un­learned in part) farre fitter for the Miniſtry then a pro­phane50 wretch (though the greateſt Scholler in Chriſten­dom.Quoniam non omnibus forte etiam nullis ea donorum ubertas obtingit a ſpi­ritu, quae Apo­ſtolis. Nulla fuerit impietas quod donis illius diminutum eſt ſupplere diſciplinarum adminiculis Eraſmus. in Eccleſiaſt. edit. Froben. An. 1554. Hodie quum pluſquam neceſſaria fit linguarum cognitio, & Deus hoc tempore mirabile beneficio eas ex tenebris in lucem eruerit ſunt nunc magni theologi qui fuoioſè adverſas eas declamitent quum certum ſit ſpiritum ſanctum eterno elogio hic ornaſſe linguas, colligere promptum eſt quonum ſpiritu agantur iſti cenſores. Calu. in c. 4. 1. ep. ad Corin. ) Thus far now this is granted. Yet withall I cannot think that God would have ſupplied miraculouſly the firſt preachers of the Goſpel with an extraordinary gift of tongues; and an infallible ſpirit in expounding Scrip­ture: if he had not in his wiſdome thought that it was moſt fitting for one that were learned in the Originall Tongues to interpret Scripture publiquely.

A ſecond thing you ſay we grant is,That the Ceremony of impoſition of hands is not neceſſary to the making of a Miniſter.

But who hath granted this I know not. I have not, for p. 76. I ſay, that I cannot think it can be omitted without ſin in an ordinary orderly ordination: and I give reaſons for it. Nor can I finde any place where my reverend brother, Mr. Hall, hath been ſo free in granting away Scripture precepts. Nor is it much conſiderable who hath granted it; for who ever they are, they have granted away a truth was not theirs to diſpoſe of. The word of God hath not granted it; and we cannot grant you away any piece of that, unleſſe you can bring us a ticket under Chriſts hand. Nay, you your ſelfe will not grant it, for p. 2. you ſay, they muſt be ſet apart,Non eſt mini­mum iota legis à quo non màgni montes pendent. according to the Goſpel rule. Now what that is, you tell us, 1 Tim. 5.22. Lay hands ſuddenly on no man. And Acts 13.3. To the Law, and to the Teſti­mony, (Sir,) Iſ. 8.20. Except we could finde ſome ordi­nations there, without this we cannot make ſo ſlight a buſineſſe of it, eſpecially when the holy Ghoſt layeth ſo much weight upon it as to expreſſe the whole ordinance of ordination by it.

3. A third thing you ſay was granted is,51That ſuch as intend the miniſtry, and are to be ſet apart for it, may as probationers preach publikely, and that Batchelours of Art may common-place in a Chap­pell, to the end that their Abilities may be tried and judged.

This indeed is granted you by Mr. Hall,Pulpit guar­ded p. 4. Vindiciae mi­niſt. 17. V. Mr. Ruther­ford, Due Right p. 281. 305. and by my ſelfe, upon that ground of Scripture, 1 Tim. 5.22. yet not without due limitation. 1. As Probationers. 2. Before the Elders, or the Church in which he is conſtantly to preach. So Mr. Hall limits it.) I have added, 3. Not without the ap­probation of the Presbytery that is to ordain him. 4. Not to make a work of it, but to doe it ſome few times. And (Sir) theſe are Scripture bounds. For the text onely ſayes,A minori ad majus affirman­di. Lay hands ſuddenly on none, and Let him be firſt proved (which is ſpoken of Deacons, but holds a fortiori, to preachers. So that all his preaching muſt be in order to a proof, and a ſecuring of Timothy from laying on hands ſuddenly. Now (Sir) the means muſt be proportionate to the end; Reaſon tels you with theſe limitations, it is granted, ſir.

4. You ſay we grant, that ordaining is not the onely thing neceſſary. We grant it indeed, for there muſt be before this miniſteriall gifts, 1 Tim. 2.2. and an inclination to the work, 1 Tim. 3.1.

5. We doe grant you, That in extraordinary caſes, as when no regular ordination can be had, nor any poſſibility of obtaining it, as in caſe of perſecution, or the like; or when people are diſperſed into Countries, where no Miniſter can be had, or where a Church is to be planted amongſt Infidels; and ſo in the infancy of the Church. Alſo in the corrupted collapſed eſtate, & generall diſorder of a Church. So when the Church is in any danger; as in caſe of lack of a Pilat or Cap­tain, when the ſhip is in danger, or the Souldiers aſſaulted, the Marriners or Souldiers may appoint a Captaine or Maſter of the ſhip: ſo may the people in theſe and ſuch like caſes ſet apart, and appoint one of themſelves to this office, and here (as they ſay) God doth call immediately and extraordinarily.
52

Si itaque hic factum eſt in us qui imme­diate ſunt vo­cati, &c. V Chemnit. l. com. p. 3. p. 137. Edit. fol. Ʋ. Calv. Inſtit. l. 4. ſect. 14. Neceſſitas non habet legem.That ſame word ſuch like comes in unhandſomely after your large enumeration of all the neceſſary caſes, I know or ever heard of. Yea, you reckon one too many. For ſuppoſe a Church be to be planted amongst Infidels, I thinke Gods way is the beſt way to doe it in. So it was Acts 13.3, 4, 5: he did not ſend meerly gifted perſons to doe it, but calls from Heaven to his Church to ſet a part Paul and Barnabas, before they went; which they did by faſting and prayer, and laying on of hands: yet both of them were extraordinarily gifted. Indeed if ſuch ordination cannot be had) we grant it.

6. You ſay we grant, That every private man may in his "own family read and apply to his own family ſomething from the letter of Scripture.

Expounding is not a proper terme for their ablities. Otherwiſe we grant it.

7. You ſay truely we grant,That any private Chriſtian may privately and occaſionally, exhort, teach, admoniſh, re­prove or comfort his brother.

8. You ſay we grant, That any private Chriſtian may write "upon any Scripture, and teach another by pen.

No (Sir) we onely ſay, able orthodox private Chriſti­ans may.

9. We freely yield, That private Chriſtians occaſionally "meeting together, may repeat Sermons, relate experiences, and confer one with another.

10. We grant that private perſons may make an open con­feſſion "of their faith, if called to it, or forced to it.

11. "That Magiſtrates may give publique charges, and make ſpeeches and exhortations to the people; we yield it.

12. That any man may make a publique apologie or defence to cleare himſelfe from unjuſt accuſations we grant, if he be called to it in ſeaſonable time, and convenient place he may doe it; but not to juſtle out an Ordinance of God.

You ſay, "We will make further uſe of this afterwards. We will wait upon you for that (Sir) In the mean time let me make a little.

53

And now (conſcientious Reader!) if thou beeſt of an hum­ble learning ſpirit, judge betwixt us the miniſters of the Goſpell, and Mr. Sheppard. Is there not room enough in theſe grants for a Chriſtian in his own private family, or in a private meeting (if he be of an humble and ſober ſpirit) to exerciſe all the gifts he hath? but the Pulpit muſt needs be made big enough for him to ſit in, even with the Ambaſſadors of the Lord Jeſus Chriſt? and to preach in their place? Judge, I pray thee Reader, whether the Preachers of the Goſpell of Chriſt in England be ſo guilty of ſmothering the brethrens gifts, as Mr. Sheppard would make them to be p. 12, p. 74, 75. of his book, and ſee how thoſe pages and theſe agree.

CHAP. III. Animadverſions and an Anſwer to the fourth and fifth page of the booke, ſtating the buſineſſe in difference; together with an account of the ten propoſitions he brings in order to the guard.

THis Gentleman comes now to his third Chapter, and in that, having already ſhewed wherein we agree both, he comes to ſtate the buſineſſe in difference.

And in his firſt lines, he ſayes right that the Preachers doe affirm (yea, and muſt ſtand to that affirmation too) till better arguments be brought us, then this book will afford us)That private perſons (though gifted and called,Queſtion ſtat. i. e. dſidered by the people) may not ordinarily open and apply Scriptures in the publick aſſemblies of a conſtituted Church, without a ſolemn ſetting apart to that office.

My brother Hall puts in a Call. I balk't that word pur­poſely, becauſe I knew what our brethren call a Call, and I meant ſomething more.

54

This point (ſaith this Gentleman) The people deny and oppoſe. (That's no great matter, if they cannot diſprove it. But in order to the mannaging of their oppoſition, he brings us ten poſitions (which he calls truths) which well proved, he thinks will guard this priviledge.

I hope he intends them not for a Life-guard to the pre­tended truth; if they were they ſhould ſtand neerer to it. For, for the firſt foure, I will undertake for him, that ſhall oppoſe the intended truth, which chiefely lies in the fifth, ſixth, and ſeventh. He ſhall cut the throat of them, if he will, and neither a one of the firſt foure ſhall check him. So the Van-guard ſtands for little, but to make a ſhew. Yet it will not be amiſſe to examine theſe (for fear they ſhould have a dagger more then any one ſees) and be more in the Authors meaning, then they are in common view and apprehenſion.

The Vanguard then conſiſts of theſe foure notions. 1. "That the Scripture doe as well belong to the people, as the Preachers. Quid inde? what then? or who denies it.

2. That the people, as well as the Preachers, are to read and ſtudy the Scriptures.God forbid but they ſhould read and ſtudy them; but what of that?

3. "That the Expoſition of the Scriptures, as to the right uſe and underſtanding of them, is neceſſary to the people, as well as the preachers. I obſerve a ſcurvy term, As well as, in every propoſition. If there be not a ſnake in that word, I ſee nothing of falſhood in this.

4. "That the people, as well as Preachers, are to abound in the knowledge of the Scriptures. [As wel as] again? Surely the cheat lies in that terme; we will ſearch it anon. But admit it rightly underſtood.

After theſe, comes in the Tripartite notion, called, the priviledge that ſhould be guarded.

1. That the gift of Scriptures expoſition (being a part of that prophecy which doth now remain) is a gift common to all people of Chriſt out of office, as well as the Preachers of Chriſt in office.

55 "2. That the people may as well uſe the gift of expounding Scripture, as the Preachers.

"3. That it is the duty of all people of God, as well as of the Preachers to expound Scriptures.

In the laſt place comes in the Rear-guard, conſiſting of three other poſitions: which are innocent truths, if they have no daggers under their ſhirts, more then a common Reader will ſee (God willing) we will ſearch them anon.

"1. That all Gods people may and ought to expound Scrip­tures to themſelves, and one to another.

Query. What the Author means by expounding. 2 By one to another? If by expounding he means ſpeaking of the Scriptures, or telling their thoughts; or what they have heard, or read, or obſerved of the ſence of the Scriptures; and by One another, he means privately. It is granted.

2. That ſuch as have any ſingular gift herein above others, are to exerciſe it, as may be moſt for the profit of others.

This is true enough: onely adding, that they keep the limits by which Gods Word, and their calling bounds them.

3. That theſe expoſitions of Scripture of the people one to another have been frequently bleſſed of God for the begetting and encreaſing of faith in the hearers.

This I feare will prove anon to be barely proved; yet we dare not limit the holy one of Iſrael; nor ſay, but that they may have ſometimes been ſo bleſſed: although I be­lieve you might have left out the word frequently, I feare you will want Scripture proofe anon for that word.

Theſe are his ten Propoſitions.

Now, Sir, although I could grant you, and eaſily doe grant you ſeverall of theſe poſitions to be true (if rightly underſtood) yet I ſhall examine what you have ſaid to all them. Partly, becauſe I have a ſuſpicion upon ſome words in them not to have ſo honeſt a meaning, as they have a looke. And partly, that I might ſee whether you have been guided by the Spirit in your applications of your many Scrip­tures56 to prove the points for which they are brought. I will begin with the firſt of your Van-guard.

CHAP. IV. Wherein the fifth, and part of the ſixth page is exa­mined: and the firſt propoſition is ſcann'd, and opened, viz. That the Scriptures doe as well belong to the people, as the Preachers.

THe firſt propoſition is, That that the Scriptures doe as wel "belong to the people, as to the Preachers.

This point the Gentleman, firſt proves. Secondly, cleares from objections.

1. He proves it (he ſhould have done well to have ope­ned it firſt.) Thoſe two terms, 1. Belong. 2. As well as, are not cleare. We may ſay, the government of the City belongs to the people of it; but how? quoad exercitium actus? as to the exerciſe of the acts of government. Are the keys of government theirs? no ſure. Then farewell Magiſtracy, and welcome Levelling. But it belongs to them as it is for their good, and peace, and order, as that under which, and according to the rule of which they are to live.

If this Gentleman means by belonging, what the Apo­ſtle ſaith, 1 Tim. 3.16. That the Scriptures are profitable for all, for doctrine, for reproofe, for correction, for inſtruction in righteouſneſſe. That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furniſhed unto all good workes. God forbid but we ſhould grant it; and this belonging is proved by Deut. 29.29. and Ioh. 5.39. and Iude 3. and many other places.

But if this Genleman means, that they ſhould belong to them as the keyes to the Steward, to open and apply them to the people, he both contradicts himſelfe, for he tels us in other places of this book, That they cannot ex­pound57 and apply Scriptures authoritatively; and he contra­dicts the Apoſtle too, 1 Cor. 4.2. Myſterium diſtribuimus in verbum Dei & Sacramenta. P. Martyr ad loc. Let a man ſo account of us, as of the Miniſters of Ieſus Chriſt, and Stewards of the myſteries of God. Of which myſteries the Goſpell is one, Col. 1.16. And if he doth not meane, that the Scriptures thus belong to the people

1. He ſayes nothing to the purpoſe.

2: His ſecond objection is little worth (of which more by and by) for ſuppoſe we argue thus:If the Scriptures be for the peoples uſe, and belong to them for reproofe, correction, doctrine, inſtruction in righteouſ­neſſe, then the people may expound and preach them pub­liquely.

He ſayes:They are committed to Preachers, and yet not ſo as excluding the people, But The Preachers are eſpecially,Natura enim omnes jubet mutuò eſſe cu­ſtodes ac defen­ſores ſalutis noſtrae & alienae, maxime veri fratres. Pareus. Immo quod tibi frater eſt & proximus, ideo es illius cuſtos & tibi illius ſalus eſt a deo com­mendata. P. Martyr. and by publique office, and the duty of their place to take care of them; but this hinders not, but that every Chriſtian is by duty bound in generall to take care of the ſoules of his fellow Chriſtians, and ſo of the truth.

We eaſily grant that private Chriſtians are in the gene­rall bound by the Law of God and nature to take a pri­vate care of their brethrens ſoules and bodies; and of the truth, ſo farre as to keep it in their own hearts, and propagate it in their own families; yea and to admoniſh, reprove, and exhort one another: to watch over them, if ſtanding: if any brother be fallen through infirmity, to endeavour to reſtore him in the ſpirit of meekneſſe. But (Sir) they are not to take a publique care of, nor are they put in a publique truſt concerning their brethrene ſoules. Neither are the Scriptures committed to them to teach others. Quicquid enim ingenio humano ex cogitatum aſſuitur Scrip­turae ut pro di­vinitus revelato habeatur men­dacium eſt. Pareus in Apoc. c. 22. 1 Tim. 2.2.

What the word of God doth not ſay in reference to the Ordi­nances and worſhip of God, that we muſt not ſay. For if we doe we ſhall adde to the Scriptures. God muſt order every pin in the Tabernacle.

But the word of God no where ſaies, that the people58 have the glorious Goſpel of God committed to their truſt, to teach others out of it, as 1 Tim. 1.11. 1 Tim. 6.20. 2 Tim. 2.2. and therefore we muſt not ſay, the people have it com­mitted to them. The Scripture warrants no ſuch ſpeech, it is not the language of Canaan. And ſo (Sir) in point of publique truſt they are excluded, as much as a Com­miſſion to his Excellency to be Lord Deputy of Ireland, ex­cludes others from being ſo, though it be not ſaid ſo (in the letter) in the Commiſſion. In point of uſe indeed the people are every where included, but they are no where called Stewards, &c.

And (Sir) for your diſtinction between committed, and ſo committed, it is Apocryphall. The Scripture no where ſayes, they are at all committed to them. You muſt remem­ber (Sir) your own marginall note which you give, as p. 29. Ʋbi lex non diſtinguit, non eſt diſtinguendum.

But to juſtifie what you ſay, you tell us that it is com­mitted to the people; for,In 1 Tim. 3.15. the Apoſtle ſaies, That the whole Church, not the Preachers onely, is the pillar and ground of truth.

Any one may ſee a Non ſequitur (without ſpectacles) in the Argument. And the Gentlemans proofes will none of them prove this, nor any thing like unto it.

In the next place he comes to cleare his point from two Objections. He frames one from Revel. 2. Where the Epiſtles are directed to the Angels. To this he anſwers: 1. The Angels are taken collectively for the whole Churches, as Exod. 4.2. Iſrael my ſonne. 2. He ſayes, It is clearly ex­preſſed, Revel. 2.7. He that hath an eare to beare let him beare what the Spirit ſayes to the Churches.To which I anſwer.

Though I ſhould never have made this objection, but think there is very little ſtrength in it, and the Gentle­man onely brought it forth to try his skill about it, yet I conceive his anſwer is too ſhort in it: and ſeeing the ar­gument is weake, it is charity for diſputation ſake to take its part.

591. It will hardly be proved, that Angel is taken any where collectively; that Iſrael is, is plain enough from more pla­ces then one. The term Angel, I take it, is ſcarce found but to ſignifie an Angel by nature, or by office. Now it is abſurd to ſay, that all the people in a Church are ſent, and in office: which is the appellative ſignification of the term.

To his ſecond anſwer.

2. The Spirit ſpake to the Churches. Although the Epi­ſtles were not directed immediately to all the members, doubtleſſe they were directed to their Officers for their uſe. And thus the holy Ghoſt ſpeaks to us in ſpeaking to the Jews of old: and to the Jews, and Chriſtians in the new Teſtament. Elſe neither the Scriptures of the Old, nor the New Teſtament belong to us.

He frames a ſecond Objection, p. 5.

Ob.The Scriptures are committed to the truſt and care of Preachers in Office.1 Tim. 1.11. 6 20. 2 Tim. 2.14.3.14. Tit. 1.3.

The bringing of this objection makes me think, he underſtood by [as well) that the Scriptures did equally belong to people as Preachers, and are alike committed to them. For if this objection oppoſeth the doctrine, he muſt mean by belonging, a belonging to them as the Lords Truſtees and Commiſſioners in the Goſpel. And then his poſition is falſe, and theſe Scriptures which he here quotes unanſwerably prove it ſo. Yet he pretends to anſwer.

Sir, As to that text, 1 Tim. 3.15. it is a very diſputable text, who the Apoſtle calls there, the pillar and ground of truth, is not ſo well agreed, as you preſume. Some refer it to Timothy. Mr. Calvin ſaith,V. Deodate ad loc. Ʋ. Leigh ad loc. Calv. ad loc. Ʋ. Leigh ib. Engl. Annot. Elogium hoc ad miniſte­rium verbi pertinet. That it is to be applied to the miniſtry of the Word. Others underſtand it of the living God, who is indeed the pillar and ground of truth. So Cameron, and others.) To bar either of theſe interpretations, you have nothing but the poor credit of a comma or two;60 and thoſe that knew any thing, know that the Originall copies generally are both without ſtops and diſtinction of verſes. For my own part, I ſhould underſtand it of the living God, and ſupply〈…〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, [who is] and then your proofe failes.

But admit it be the Church, it is gratis dictum, and not proved, that by Church he mean all the individuall mem­bers. The Papiſts generally contend, that the Church is there called the pillar and ground of truth; and thence Bellarmine and Eſtius,V. Eſtium ad loc. V. Calv ad loc. Beza ad loc. and others conclude it cannot erre. It is alſo diſputed, whether it be meant of the Church Ʋniverſall or particular. Proteſtants maintain it of the Church Ʋniverſall. And doubtleſſe if it be to be underſtood of the Church at all, it muſt be of the Church Ʋniverſall, and not of every individuall member of that. And then it is to be conſidered in what ſence the Church is the pillar and ground of truth; and it is concluded, that the Church is the pillar of truth, becauſe in that truth is to be found. As Proclamations hang upon pillars, ſo the Church is the Pillar of truth; but (Sir) you prove nothing, if you doe not prove that the Individuall members of the Church are ſpeaking pillars, which will be an hard task for you. Indeed they ſhould be pillars of truth, to beare the Law of the Lord upon their hearts and converſations. And they are, as you ſay, from Iude 3. to contend for the faith. But the queſtion is, whether God hath committed the doctrine of faith to them to preach? No ſuch thing is proved from that text in