VVHen one of the Diſciples of our Bleſſed Saviour begged this boone of his Maſter for himſelfe, and his fellowes; Lord teach us to pray, as John alſo taught his Diſciples, Luke 11. 2. Chriſt did not then anſwer them, as he did upon another occaſion, when they were to be brought before Kings and Governours for his ſake: For then he bids them take no thought, how, or what they ſhall ſpeake, becauſe it ſhall be given them in that houre what they ſhall ſpeake, Mat. 10. 19. But now although he were as well able to put words into their mouthes to pray to his Father, as the Holy Ghoſt was then to anſwer their Perſecutors: Yet he doth not ſay, Take no thought, how, or what yee ſhall pray; for it ſhall be given you in that houre what yee ſhall pray: Neither doth he adde as he doth there, v. 20. For it is not yee that pray, but the Spirit of my Father that prayeth in you: He neither makes ſuch an Anſwer, nor addes ſuch a Reaſon, but tells them what things they ſhall pray for, and in what words preſent it; this being his Anſwer to the Petition, when yee pray, ſay, Our Father which art in Heaven, &c. From which Petition of the Diſciple, and anſwer of the beſt skil'd Maſter, I have theſe few things obſervable.
1. That John the Baptiſt (as it is very apparent) did preſcribe and teach his Diſciples a ſet Forme of Prayer, and did not bid them (as it is now ſaid) pray by the ſpirit.
2. From this anſwer of our Saviour it may be gathered, that a ſet Forme of Prayer is lawfull for all Chriſtians, as it was for the Diſciples of Chriſt, and St John.
3. That this Prayer which Chriſt taught his Diſciples is not to be neglected of any, but may, and ought to be uſed and practiſed of all, in obedience to Chriſt who commands it.
4. That both the Diſciples of John, and our Saviour praying in that manner as they did, and were taught by their inſtructors, did pray by the ſpirit.
5. That all things neceſſary for man, either body or ſoule, this life, or that which is to come, are ſummed up in that Prayer, which Chriſt there preſcribed.
6. That Publick Prayer is to be preferred before Private, becauſe Chriſt taught them to pray in a Body together, not ſeverally aſunder, bidding them not to ſay My, but Our Father anſwering the Diſciples requeſt, not teach Me, but Us to pray.
Now, becauſe the Liturgy, or Publick Service of the Church is laid aſide, and decried as Popiſh and Superſtitious (with other unſeemely expreſſions) and that Chriſts owne Forme of Prayer is in particular villified by ſome irreligious and ſcurrilous tongues; ſome offering to God a worſe then Phariſaicall Thanksgiving, for that they never could ſay it; others that they have forgotten it; a third ſort publickly glorying, that they have not ſayd it in ſo many yeares paſt; and in generall, that it is neglected and left to a careleſſe tuition: And that the Apoſtles Creed is altogether expunged, the New Publick Service either as unneceſſary, or imperfect, or fruitleſſe. I have thought good this verſifying way to recall it into peoples mindes, eſpecially thoſe who (ſtilo Antiquo) have been incorporated into the Body of Chriſts Congregation, and to remember all undertakers, how at the Holy Font they have ingaged themſelves before God and the Church, to make proviſion that they may learne the Creed, the Lords Prayer, and the ten Commandements in the Engl•ſh tongue.
Reader, this which thou ſeeſt of the Lords Prayer, was ſo done about 23 or 24 yeares ſince, and there are many Coppies of it abroad, the other of the Creed is newly conceived, and delivered to the Light: I have nothing to Apologize for my ſelfe, but thoſe Sinewy Lines of that Excellent man, Mr. GEORGE HARBERT in his Church Porch.
October 22. 1649.Imprimatur,
London, Printed by Thomas Harper, and are to be ſold by John Courtney, in Salisbury, 1650.
(EEBO-TCP ; phase 2, no. A81559)
Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 163071)
Images scanned from microfilm: (Thomason Tracts ; 246:669f14[84])
Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.