PRIMS Full-text transcription (HTML)

ESSAYES IN DIVINITY; By the late Dr DONNE, Dean of S Paul's. BEING Several DISQUISITIONS, Interwoven with MEDITATIONS AND PRAYERS:

Before he entred into Holy Orders.

Now made publick by his Son J. D. Dr of the Civil Law.

LONDON, Printed by T. M. for Richard Marriot, and are to be ſold at his Shop in St Dunſtan's Church-yard Fleet-ſtreet. 1651.

〈1 page missing〉

that in owning theſe leſs, yet more lawfull iſſues of this modern Author, you will prove a greater Mecaenas then thoſe former Writers ever had, in giving a livelihood to theſe Ofſprings, that had no proviſion left them by their Fa­ther.

And to beg this fa­vour, they come (Sir) with the greater con­fidence, becauſe being writ when the Author was obliged in Civill buſineſs, and had no ingagement in that of the Church, the manner of their birth may ſeem to have ſome analogie with the courſe you now ſeem to ſteer; who being ſo highly inter­eſſed in the publick Af­fairs of the State, can yet allow ſo much time to the exerciſe of your private Devotions; which, with the help of your active wiſdom, hath ſo ſetled us, as the tempeſtuous North­windes are not like to blaſt in the Spring be­fore it come to a full growth, nor the South to over-ripen, till it arrive at ſuch a perfe­ction as may equall the birth of PALLAS; which could be pro­duced from nothing but the very brains of JUPITER; who although ſhee came arm'd from thence, yet it had not been ſufficient to have had a God for her Fa­ther, if ſhe had not had METIS to her Mother. Which ſhews us, that the Ʋnion is ſo inſepa­rable between Coun­ſell and Strength, that our Armies a­broad of this Book to your pro­tection, and of my ſelf to your Commands.

Your moſt humble Servant, JOHN DONNE.

To the Reader.

IT is thought fit to let thee know, that theſe Eſſayes. were printed from an exact Copy, under the Authors own hand: and, that they were the voluntary ſa­crifices of ſeverall hours, when he had many de­bates betwixt God and himſelf, whether he were worthy, and compe­tently learned to enter into Holy Orders. They are now publiſh'd, both to teſtifie his modeſt Va­luation of himſelf, and to ſhew his great abili­ties; and, they may ſerve to inform thee in many Holy Curioſities.

Fare-well.

1

ESSAYES IN DIVINITY.

In the Beginning God crea­ted Heaven and Earth.Gen. 1.1.

I Do not therefore ſit at the door, and meditate upon the threſhold, becauſe I may not enter further;Apoc. 3.7. For he which is holy and true, and hath the key of Da­vid, and openeth and no man ſhut­teth, and ſhutteth and no man o­peneth; hath ſaid to all the hum­ble in one perſon, I have ſet be­fore thee an open door, and no man2 can ſhut it, for thou haſt a little ſtrength. Lyra.And the holy Scriptures, ſignified in that place, as they have theſe properties of a well provided Caſtle, that they are ea­ſily defenſible, and ſafely defend others. So they have alſo this, that to ſtrangers they open but a litle wicket, and he that will enter, muſt ſtoop and humble himſelfe. To reverend Divines, who by an ordinary calling are Officers and Commiſſioners from God, the great Doors are open. Let me with Lazarus lie at the threſhold, and beg their crums. Diſcite à me, ſayes our bleſſed Saviour, Learn of me, as Saint Auguſtine enlarges it well,Mat. 11. not to do Miracles, nor works ex­ceeding humanity; but, quia mitis ſum; learn to be humble. His humility, to be like us, was a Dejection; but ours, to be like him, is our chiefeſt exaltation; and yet none other is required at our hands. Where this Humility is,Prov. 11. ibi Sapientia. Therfore it is not ſuch a groveling, frozen, and ſtu­pid3 Humility, as ſhould quench the activity of our underſtanding, or make us neglect the Search of thoſe Secrets of God, which are acceſſible. For, Humility, and Studiouſneſſe,Tho. 2 a, 2 ae. 161. & 166. (as it is oppoſed to curioſity, and tranſgreſſes not her bounds) are ſo near of kin, that they are both agreed to be limbes and members of one ver­tue, Temperance.

Theſe bounds Daniel excee­ded not;Dan. 10.11. and yet he was Vir Deſideriorum, and in ſatisfaction of ſo high Deſires, to him alone were thoſe viſions diſcovered. And to ſuch deſires and endeavours the Apoſtle encourageth the Co­rinths,1 Cor. 12.31. Aemulamini Chariſmata meliora, Deſire you better gifts, and I wil yet ſhew you a better way. It is then humility to ſtudy God, and a ſtrange miraculous one; for it is an aſcending humility, which the Divel, which emulates even Gods excellency in his good­neſſe, and labours to be as ill, as he is good, hath corrupted in us by a pride, as much againſt rea­ſon;4 for he hath fill'd us with a deſcending pride, to forſake God, for the ſtudy and love of things worſe then our ſelves. This averts us from the Contemplation of God, and his Book. In whoſe inwards, and Sanctum Sancto­rum, what treaſure of ſaving myſteries do his Prieſts ſee, when we at the threſhold ſee enough to inſtruct and ſecure us? for he hath ſaid of his lawes,Deut. 6.9. Scribes ea in limine; And both the people, and Prince himſelfe,Ezek. 46. were to wor­ſhip at the threſhold.

Before we conſider each ſtone of this threſhold, which are

  • 1. The time, In the begining:
  • 2. The per­ſon, God:
  • 3. The Action, He created: And
  • 4. the Work, Heaven and Earth;

we will ſpeak of two or three other things, ſo many words. Of the Whole Book; Of the Author of thoſe firſt 5 Books; And of this firſt book. For earth­ly princes look for ſo many pau­ſes and reverences, in our acceſ­ſes to their table, though they be not there.

5

Of the Bible.

God hath two Books of life; that in the Revelation, and elſe where,Apoc. 3.5. which is an eternall Regiſter of his Elect; and this Bible. For of this, it is therefore ſaid,Joh. 5.39. Search the Scriptures, becauſe in them ye hope to have eternall life. And more plainly, when in the 24. of Eccleſiaſticus Wiſdome hath ſaid in the firſt verſe, Wiſdome ſhall praiſe her ſelf, ſaying, He created me from the beginning, and I ſhall never fail, v. 12. I give eternall things to all my Children, and in me is all grace of life and truth, v. 21. They that eat me ſhall have the more hunger, and they that drink me ſhall thirſt the more, v. 24. At laſt, in v. 26. All theſe things are the book of life, and the Covenants of the moſt high God, and the law of Moſes. And as our orderly love to the underſtanding this Book of life, teſtifies to us that our names are in the other; ſo is there another book ſubordinate to this, which is liber creaturarum. 6Of the firſt book, we may uſe the words of Eſay,Iſa. 29.11. It is a book that is ſealed up, and if it be delivered to one (Scienti literas) that can read, he ſhall ſay, I cannot, for it is ſealed. So far removed from the ſearch of learning, are thoſe e­ternall Decrees and Rolls of God, which are never certainly and in­fallibly produced and exemplified in foro exteriori, but onely inſinu­ated and whiſper'd to our hearts, Ad informandum conſcientiam Ju­dicis, which is the Conſcience it ſelfe. Of the Second book, which is the Bible, we may uſe the next verſe; The book ſhall be given (As interpreters agree, open) Neſcien­ti literas, to one which cannot read: and he ſhall be bid read, and ſhall ſay, I cannot read. By which we learn, that as all mankind is na­turally one flock feeding upon one Common, and yet for ſocie­ty and peace, Propriety, Magi­ſtracy, and diſtinct Functions are reaſonably induc'd; ſo, though all our ſoules have intereſt in this their common paſture, the book7 of life, (for even the ignorant are bid to read;) yet the Church hath wifely hedged us in ſo farr, that all men may know, and cultivate, and manure their own part, and not adventure upon great reſerv'd myſteries, nor treſpaſs upon this book, without inward humility, and outward interpretations. For it is not enough to have objects, and eyes to ſee, but you muſt have light too. The firſt book is then impoſſible; The ſecond dif­ficult; But of the third book, the the book of Creatures, we will ſay the 18th. verſe, The deaf ſhall heare the word of this book, and the eyes of the blinde ſhall ſee out of ob­ſcurity. And ſo much is this book available to the other, that Sebund,Ray. Seb. in prolo. when he had digeſted this book into a written book, durſt pro­nounce, that it was an Art, which teaches al things, preſuppoſes no o­ther, is ſoon learned, cannot be for­gotten, requires no books, needs on witneſſes, and in this, is ſafer then the Bible it ſelf, that it can­not be falſified by Hereticks. 8And ventures further after,Tit. 166. to ſay, That becauſe his book is made ac­cording to the Order of Creatures, which expreſs fully the will of God, whoſoever doth according to his booke, fulfils the will of God. Howſoever, he may be too abundant in affirming, that in li­bro creaturarum there is enough to teach us all particularities of Chriſtian Religion,De im­manifeſto Deo mani­feſtiſſimo. (for Triſme­giſtus going farr, extends not his proofs to particulars;) yet St Paul clears it thus far, that there is e­nough to make us inexcuſable, if we ſearch not further. Rom. 2.And that further ſtep is the knowledg of this Bible, which only, after Phi­loſophy hath evicted and taught us an Unity in the Godhead, ſhews alſo a Trinity. Greg. Hom. 35. in E­vang.As then this life compared to bleſſed eternity, is but a death, ſo the books of Philoſophers, which only inſtruct this life, have but ſuch a proporti­on to this book: Which hath in it Certainty, for no man aſſigns to it other beginning then we do, though all allow not ours: Dig­nity,9 for what Author proceeds ſo ſine teſte? (and he that requires a witneſſe, believes not the thing, but the witneſſe;) And a non No­tis; (for he which requires reaſon believes himſelfe, and his own approbation and allowance of the reaſon.) And it hath Suffici­ency; for it either rejecteth or judgeth all Traditions. It exceeds all others in the object, for it con­ſiders the next life; In the way, for it is written by revelation; yea the firſt piece of it which ever was written, which is the Decalogue, by Gods own finger. And as Ly­ra notes, being perchance too Al­legoricall and Typick in this, it hath this common with all o­ther books, that the words ſig­nifie things; but hath this parti­cular, that all the things ſignifie other things.

There are but two other books, (within our knowledge) by which great Nations or Troops are go­vern'd in matter of Religion; The Alcoran, and Talmud; of which, the firſt is eſteemed, only10 where ours is not read. And be­ſides the common infirmity of all weak, and ſuſpicious, and craſie religions, that it affords ſalvation to all good men, in any Religion, yea,Epiſt. Pii ſecundi ad Morisb. Tunam. to Divels alſo, with our ſin­gular Origen, is ſo obnoxious, and ſelf-accuſing, that, to confute it, all Chriſtian Churches have ever thought it the readieſt and preſenteſt way to divulge it. And therefore Luther, after it had re­ceived Cribrationem, a ſifting by Cuſanus,Praefat. ad lect. ad lib. de moribus Turcarum. perſwades an Edition of the very Text, becauſe he thinks the Roman Church can no way be ſhak'd more, then thus to let the world ſee, how Siſter-like thoſe two Churches are. But that man of infinite undertaking, and induſtry, and zeal, and bleſſings from the Higheſt, had not ſeen the Alcoran when he writ this, though he mention it: Nor Cuſa­nus his book certainly; for elſe he could not have ſaid, that the Car­dinall had only excerpted and ex­hibited to the world the infa­mous and ridiculous parts of it,11 and ſlipt the ſubſtantiall; for he hath deduced an harmony, and conformity of Chriſtianity out of that book. Melancthon alſo coun­ſels this Edition,Praemonit. ad Edit. Alcor. Ʋt ſciamus quale Poema ſit. And Biblian­der obſerves, that it is not only too late to ſuppreſſe it now, but that the Church never thought it fit to ſupreſſe it;Apolog. pro Edit. Alcor. becauſe (ſaith he) there is nothing impious in it, but is formerly reprehenſively re­giſtred in the Fathers. As Cuſa­nus hath done from the Alcoran, Galatinus hath from the Tal­mud deduced all Chriſtianity,De arcanis Cathol. ve­ritatis. and more. For he hath proved all Ro­man traditions from thence. We grudge them not thoſe victories: but this flexibility and appliable­neſſe to a contrary religion, ſhews perfectly, how leaden a rule thoſe lawes are. Without doubt, their books would have been received with much more hunger then they are, if the Emperour Maxi­milian, by Reuchlyus counſell, had not allowed them free and open paſſage. If there were not12 ſome compaſſion belong'd to them who are ſeduced by them; I ſhould profeſſe, that I never read merrier books then thoſe two. Ours therefore, begun, not only in the firſt ſtone, but in the intire foundation, by Gods own finger, and purſued by his Spirit, is the only legible book of life; and is without doubt devolv'd from thoſe to our times. For God, who firſt writ his Law in the Ta­bles of our hearts; and when our corruption had defaced them, writ it again in Stone-tables;Exod. 31.18. and when Moſes zealous anger had broken them, writ them again in other tables,Exod. 34.1. leaves not us worſe provided, whom he loves more, both becauſe he ever in his pro­vidence fore-ſaw the Jews de­fection, and becauſe in a naturall fatherly affection, he is delighted with his Sons purchaſes. For that interruption which the courſe of this book is imagin'd by great Authours to have had,Irenaeus. Tertul. Clem. Al. Euſeb. Hiero. &c. by the pe­riſhing in the Captivity, cannot poſſibly be allowed, if either13 Gods promiſe, or that hiſtory be conſidered; nor, if that were poſſible, is it the leſſe the work of God, if Eſdras refreſh'd and recompiled it by the ſame ſpirit which was in the firſt Authour; Nor is it the leſſe ancient, no more then a man is the leſſe old, for having ſlept, then walked out a day. Our age therefore hath it; and our Church in our language; for ſince the Jeſuit Sacroboſous,Def. Conc. Trid. c. 1. and more late interpreters of the Trent Councell, have abandoned. their old ſtation, and defence of the letter of the Canon, pro­nouncing the vulgate Edition to be authentick, (which they here­tofore aſſumed for the contro­verted point) and now ſay, that that Canon doth only preferre it before all Latine Tranſlations; and that not Abſolutà, (ſo to a­void barbariſmes) but In ordine ad fidem & mores; and have gi­ven us limits and rules of allow­able infirmities in a Tranſlation, as corruptions not offenſive to faith, obſerving the meaning,14 though not the words, If the He­brew text may bear that reading, and more ſuch: We might, if we had not better aſſurances, rely upon their words, that we have the Scripture, and nearer perfe­ction, then they.

Of Moſes.

The Author of theſe firſt five books is Moſes. In which num­ber, compoſ'd of the firſt even, and firſt odd, becauſe Cabaliſtick learning ſeems to moſt Occupatiſ­ſima vanitas, I will forbear the obſervations, both of Picus in his Hepſaplus, and in the Harmony of Francis George, that tranſcen­ding Wit,In Gen. l. 1. c. 8. whom therefore Pere­rius charges to have audax nimis, & ad devia & abruta opinionum praeceps ingenium, though they have many delicacyes of honeſt and ſerviceable curioſity, and harmleſs recreation and entertain­ment. For as Catechiſers give us the milk of Religion, and poſitive Divines ſolid nutriment, ſo when15 our conſcience is ſick of ſcruples, or that the Church is wounded by ſchiſmes, which make ſolutio­nem continui, (as Chirurgians ſpeak) though there be proper uſe of controverted Divinity for Medicine, yet there be ſome Can­kers, (as Judaiſme. ) which can­not be cur'd without the Cabal; which is (eſpecially for thoſe diſeaſes,) the Paracelſian Phi­ſick of the underſtanding,Archange­lus Apol. Cabal. and is not unworthily (if it be one­ly applyed where it is ſo medici­nable) call'd praeambulum Evan­gelii. Apoc. 5.9.[They of the Synagogue of Satan, which call themſelves Jews, and are not, but do lie] as though they were ſtill in the de­ſert, and under the incommodi­ties of a continuall ſtraying and ignorance of their way, (and ſo they are, and worſe; for then they onely murmured againſt their guide, for not performing Gods promiſes, now, they have no promiſe) are not content with their Pillar of fire, this Mo­ſes, but have condenſ'd to them­ſelves16 a Pillar of Cloud, Rabbi Moſes,Druſ. in Not. ad no­men Tetra. call'd the Egyptian, but a Spaniard. [A Moſe ad Moſem non ſurrexit qualis Mo­ſes] they ſay. This man qua­relling with many imperfections, and ſome contradictions in our Moſes works, and yet concur­ring with the Jews in their opinion of his perfectneſs, if he were un­derſtood, accompliſh'd and per­fected their legem Oralem; which they account to be delivered by God to our Moſes in his forty dayes converſation with him, and after delivered to Eſdras, and ſo deſcended to theſe Ages. His lateneſs and ſingularity, makes him not worth thus many words: We will therefore leave this Mo­ſes, and haſten to the diſpatch of the other. Who, becauſe he was principal Secretary to the Ho­ly Ghoſt, (I diſpute not other dignities, but onely priority in time) is very credible, though he be his owne Hiſtoriographer. Therefore, though his owne books beſt ſhow who, and what17 he was, let us endeavour other­wiſe to bring thoſe men to ſome reverence of his Antiquity, who bring no taſte to his Philoſophy, nor faith to his Story. Pererius ſeems peremtory that no Author is elder. In Ge. c. 1. I thinke it moved him, that Henoch's booke, mentioned in the Epiſtle of Jude, is periſh'd:Epiſt. Jud. So is the booke of the Battails of the Lord (for any thing we know,) and that is not ſpoken of till Num. 21.14. and then as of a future thing. He makes it reaſonable evident, that Linus,Num. 21.14. Orpheus, and all Greeke learning came after, and from him. But if we ſhall eſcape this, that Abra­ham's booke De formationibus is yet alive, by ſuſpecting and pro­nouncing it ſuppoſitious, (yet Archangelus ſaies, he hath it, and hath commented it,Apol. Ca­bal. Problem. and Fran­cis George often vouches it;) how ſhall we deliver our ſelves from Zoroaſters Oracles? whom Epi­phanius places in Nembrots time,Fra. Pa­tricius. and Euſebius in Abraham's; ſince his language is Chaldaick, his18 works miraculouſly great,Heurnius de Philoſo. Barbaric. l. 2. (for his Oracles are twenty hundred thouſand verſes, and his phraſe more expreſs, and clear, and li­quid, in the Doctrine of the Tri­nity, then Moſes? For where ſayes this, as the other, [Toto mundo lucet Trias, cujus Monas eſt prin­ceps?] From whence ſhall we ſay that Hermes Triſmegiſtus ſucked his not only Divinity, but Chri­ſtianity? in which no Evangeliſt, no Father, no Councell is more literall and certain. Of the fall of Angels, Renovation of the world by fire, eternity of puniſhments, his Aſclepius! is plaine. Aſclep Di­al.Of Regeneration who ſayes more then [Nemo ſervari poteſt ante nogenerationem,De regene­rat. & ſi­lentio. & regenerationis generator eſt Dei filius, homo u­nus?] Of imputed Juſtice, with what Autor would he change this ſentence;De fato. [Juſtificati ſumus in Ju­ſtitia abſente?] Of our corrupt will, and Gods providence he ſays, [Anima nostra relicta à Deo, eligit corpoream naturam; at electio ejus eſt ſecundùm provi­dentiam19 Dei.] To ſay with Goro­pius, that there was no ſuch man, becauſe the publick pillars and ſta­tues in which were engraved mo­rall Inſtitutions were called Her­mae, is improbable, to one who hath read Patricius his anſwers to him. And if it be true which Buntingus in his Chronology un­diſputably aſſumes, that he was the Patriarch Joſeph, as alſo that Goropius confounds Zoroaſter and Japhet, then Moſes was not the firſt Author. But Hermes his naming of Italy,Minerva mundi. and the 12. Conſtellations in the Zodiaque, are Arguments and impreſſions of a later time. To unentangle our ſelvs in this perplexity, is more labour then profit, or perchance poſſibility. Therefore, as in vio­lent tempeſts, when a ſhip dares bear no main ſayl, and to lie ſtil at hull, obeying the uncertain wind and tyde, puts them much out of their way, and altogether out of their account, it is beſt to put forth ſuch a ſmall ragg of ſail, as may keep the barke upright, and20 make her continue neer one place, though ſhe proceed not; So in this queſtion, where we cannot go forward to make Moſes the firſt Author, for many ſtrong op­poſitions, and to ly hulling upon the face of the waters, and think nothing, is a ſtupid and lazy in­conſideration, which (as Saint Auſtin ſays) is the worſt of all affections,Rom. 1. our beſt firmament and arreſt will be that reverent, and pious, and reaſonable credulity, that God was Author of the firſt piece of theſe books, the Decalo­gue: and of ſuch Authors as God preordained to ſurvive all Philoſo­phers, and all Tyrants, and all He­reticks, and be the Canons of faith and manners to the worlds end, Moſes had the primacy. So that the Divine and learned book of Job, muſt be content to be diſpoſed to a later rank, (as indeed it hath ſomwhat a Greek taſte) or to accept Moſes for Author. For to confeſs, that it was found by Moſes in Madian, were to derogate from the other21 prerogative generally afforded to him. Epiſt. ad Paul. de lib. Di­vin.Here therefore I will tem­peratly end this inquiſition. Hie­rom tells me true, [Puerile est, & circulatorum ludo ſimile, doce­re quod ignores.] And beſides,Deu. 3 4 6. when I remember that it was God which hid Moſes's body;Jud. 1.5. And the Divell which laboured to reveal it, I uſe it thus, that there are ſome things which the Author of light hides from us, and the prince of darkneſs ſtrives to ſhew to us; but with no other light, then his firebrands of Con­tention, and curioſity.

Of Geneſis.

Picus Earl of Mirandula (happier in no one thing in this life,S John More. then in the the Author which writ it to us) being a man of an incon­tinent with, and ſubject to the con­cupiſcence of inacceſſible know­ledges and tranſcendencies,In fine Heptaph. pur­ſuing the rules of Cabal, out of the word Breſit, which is the title of this firſt Book, by vexing, and tranſpoſing, and anagrammati­zing the letters, hath expreſs'd22 and wrung out this Sum of Chri­ſtian Religion [The Father, in and through the Son, which is the be­ginning, end, and reſt, created in a perfect league, the head, fire and foundation (which he calls Heaven, Air and Earth) of the great man] (which he calls the World.) And he hath not onely delivered Moſes form any diſſonance with other ſound Philoſophers, but hath obſerved all other Philoſo­phy in Moſes's words; and more, hath found all Moſes's learning in every verſe of Moſes. But ſince our merciful God hath afforded us the whole and intire book, why ſhould wee tear it into rags, or rent the ſeamleſs garment? Since the intention of God, through Moſes, in this, was, that it might be to the Jews a Book of the gene­ration of Adam;Gen. 5.1. ſince in it is pur­poſely propounded, That all this Univerſe, Plants, the chiefeſt con­templation of Naturall Philoſo­phie and Phyſick, and no ſmall part of the Wiſdom of Solomon,1 Reg. 4.33. [who ſpake of plants, from Cedar23 to Hyſſop:] And Beaſts, who have often the honour to be our re­proach, accited for examples of vertue and wiſdome in the Scrip­tures, and ſome of them ſepoſed for the particular paſſive ſervice of God in Sacrifices (which hee gave to no man but his Son, and with held from Iſaac:) And Man, who (like his own eye) ſees all but himſelf, in his opinion, but ſo dimly, that there are mar­ked an hundred differences in mens Writings concerning an Antw And Spirits, of whom we underſtand no more, then a horſe of us: and the receptacles and theaters of all theſe, Earth, Sea, Air, Heaven, and all things were once nothing: That Man chu­ſing his own deſtruction, did what he could to annihilate himſelf a­gain, and yet received a promiſe of a Redeemer: That Gods mer­cy may not be diſtruſted, nor his Juſtice tempted, ſince the generall: Deluge, and Joſoph's preſervation are here related, filling an Hiſtory of more then 2300 yeers, with24 ſuch examples as might mol­lifie, the Jews in their wandering. I ſay, ſince this was directly and onely purpoſed by Moſes; to put him in a wine-preſſe, and ſqueeze out Philoſophy and particular Chriſtianitie, is a degree of that injuſtice, which all laws forbid, to torture a man, ſine indiciis aut ſemiprobationibus. Of the time when Moſes writ this booke, there are two opinions which have good guides, and good followers. I, becauſe to me it ſeems reaſona­ble and clear, that no Divine work preceded the Decalogue, have before engaged my ſelfe to ac­company Chemnitius, who is perſwaded by Theodoret,Exam. Conc. Trid. Bede, and Reaſon (becauſe here is inti­mation of a Sabboth, and di­ſtinction of clean and unclean in beaſts,) that this book was written after the law; And leave Pererius, whom Euſebius hath won to thinke this booke was written in Madian, induc'd only by Moſes forty years leiſure there; and a likelihood, that this Story might25 well conduce to his end, of re­clining the Jews from E­gypt.

And thus much neceſſarily, or conveniently, or pardonably, may have been ſaid, before my Entrance, with out diſpropor­tioning the whole work. For even in Solomon's magnificent Temple, the Porch to the Tem­ple had the proportion of twen­ty Cubits to ſixty. Our next ſtep is upon the threſhold it ſelf, In the beginning, &c.

26

PART. 1.

In the Beginning.IN the Beginning whereof,O onely Eternall God, of whoſe being, beginning, or laſting, this beginning is no period, nor meaſure; which art no Circle, for thou haſt no ends to cloſe up; which art not within this All, for it cannot comprehend thee; nor without it, for thou filleſt it; nor art it thy ſelf, for thou madeſt it; which having decreed from all eternity, to do thy great work of Mercy, our Redemption in the fulneſſe of time, didſt now create time it ſelfe to con­duce to it; and madeſt thy glory and thy mercy equal thus, that though thy glorious work of Creation were firſt, thy mercifull work of Redempti­on was greateſt. Let me in thy beloved Servant Auguſtine's own words,Conf. li. c. 3. when with an27 humble boldneſſe he begg'd the underſtanding of this paſſage, ſay, Moſes writ this, but is gon from me to thee; if he were here, I would hold him, and beſeech him for thy ſake, to tell me what he meant. If he ſpake Hebrew, he would fruſtrate my hope; but if Latine, I ſhould comprehend him. But from whence ſhould I know that he ſaid true? Or when I knew it, came that knowledge from him? No, for within me, within me there is a truth, not Hebrew, nor Greek, nor Latin, nor barbarous; which without organs, without noyſe of Sylla­bles, tels me true, and would en­able me to ſay confidently to Mo­ſes, Thou ſay'ſt true. Thus did he whom thou hadſt filled with faith, deſire reaſon and under­ſtanding; as men bleſt with great fortunes deſire numbers of ſervants, and other Com­plements of honour. But ano­ther inſtrument and engine of thine,Aq. 2. q. 46. A. 2. whom thou hadſt ſo en­abled, that nothing was too28 minerall nor centrick for the ſearch and reach of his wit, hath remembred me; That it is an Article of our Belief, that the world began. And therefore for this point, we are not under the inſinuations and mollify­ings of perſwaſion, and conve­niency; nor under the reach and violence of Argument, or Demonſtration, or Neceſſity; but under the Spirituall, and peaceable Tyranny, and eaſie yoke of ſudden and preſent Faith. Nor doth he ſay this, that we ſhould diſcharge our ſelves upon his word, and ſlumber in a lazy faith; for no man was ever more endeavourous then he in ſuch inquiſitions; nor he in any, more then in this point. But af­ter he had given anſwers to all the Arguments of reaſonable & naturall men, for a beginning of this world; to advance Faith duly above Reaſon, he aſſignes this with other myſteries on­ly to her comprehenſion. For Reaſon is our Sword, Faith29 our Target. With that we prevail againſt others, with this we de­fend our ſelves: And old, well diſciplined Armies puniſhed more ſeverely the loſs of this, then that.

This word, In the beginning, is the beginning of this book, which we finde firſt placed of all the holy books; And alſo of the Goſpel by Saint John, which we know to be laſt written of all. But that laſt beginning was the firſt; for the Word was with God, before God created Heaven and. Earth. And Moſes his In the Beginning, hath ever been uſed powerfully, and proſperouſly, a­gainſt Philoſophers and Hereticks relapſed into an opinion of the worlds eternity. But Saint John's In the Beginning, hath ever had ſtrength againſt the Author of all errour, the Divel himſelf, if we may beleeve the relations of exorciſts, who in their diſpoſſeſ­ſings, mention ſtrange obedien­ces of the Divell at the naked enunciation of that word. It is30 not then all one Beginning; for here God Did, there he Was. That confeſſes a limitation of time, this excludes it. Caninius Conc. To. 1. De Conc. Nic.The great Philoſo­pher, (whom I call ſo, rather for his Converſion, then his Argu­ments) who was Arius his Advocate at the firſt Nicene Councell, aſ­ſign'd a beginning between theſe two beginnings; ſaying, that after John's eternal Beginning, & before Moſes's timely beginning, Chriſt had his beginning, being then created by God for an inſtrument in his generall Creation. But God forbid that any thing ſhould need to be ſaid againſt this, now. We therefore confeſſing two Begin­nings, ſay, that this firſt was ſimul cum tempore, & that it is truly ſaid of it, Erat quando non erat, and that it inſtantly vaniſhed; and that the laſt Beginning laſts yet, and ever ſhall: And that our Mercifull God, as he made no Creature ſo frail and corruptible as the firſt Beginning, which being but the firſt point of time, dy­ed as ſoon as it was made, flow­ing31 into the next point; ſo though he made no creature like the laſt Beginning, (for if it had been as it, eternall, it had been no crea­ture;) yet it pleaſed him to come ſo neer it, that our ſoul, though it began with that first Beginning, ſhall continue and ever laſt with the laſt. We may not diſſemble, nor dare reprove, nor would avoid an­other ordinary interpretation of this Beginning, becauſe it hath great and agreeing autority, and a conſonance with our faith: which is, that by the beginning here, is meant the Son our Savior; for that is elſewhere ſaid of him,Rev. 1.8. I am firſt and laſt, which is, and was, and is to come. And hereby they would eſtabliſh his coeternity, and con­ſubſtantialneſs, becauſe he can be no creature, who is preſent at the firſt Creation. But becauſe although to us, whom the Spirit hath made faithfully credulous, and filled us with an aſſurance of this truth, every conducing, and convenient application governs and commands our aſſent, becauſe32 it doth but remember us, not teach us. But to the Jews, who roundly deny this Expoſition, & to the A­rians, who accept it, and yet call Chriſt a creature, as fore-created for an Aſſiſtant in this ſecond Cre­ation; theſe detortions have ſmall force, but as Sun-beams ſtriking ob­liquely, or arrows diverted with a twig by the way, they leſſen their ſtrength, being turned upon ano­ther mark then they were deſtined to. And therefore by the Example of our late learned Reformers, I forbear this interpretation; the ra­ther, becauſe we are utterly diſ­provided of any hiſtory of the Worlds Creation, except we de­fend and maintain this Book of Moſes to be Hiſtorical, and therefore literally to be inter­preted. Which I urge not with that peremptorineſſe, as Bellar­mine doth,De Purg. l. 1. c. 15. who anſwers all the Arguments of Moſes's ſilence in many points maintained by that Church, with this only, Eſt liber Hiſtoriarum, non Dogmatum. For then it were unproperly argued by33 our Saviour, If ye believed Mo­ſes, ye would believe me,John 5. for he writ of me. There is then in Moſes, both Hiſtory and Precept, but evidently diſtinguiſhable without violence. That then this Beginning was, is matter of faith, and ſo, infallible. When it was, is matter of reaſon, and therefore various and perplex'd. In the E­piſtle of Alexander the Great to his Mother, remembred by Cy­prian and Auguſtin, there is men­tion of 8000. years. The Calde­ans have delivered obſervations of 470000 years. And the Egypti­ans of 100000. The Chineſes vex us at this day, with irreconcilia­ble accounts. And to be ſure, that none ſhall prevent them, ſome have call'd themſelves Abo­rigenes. The poor remedy of Lu­nary and other planetary years, the ſilly and contemptible eſcape that ſome Authors ſpeak of run­ning years, ſome of years expi­red and perfected; or that the account of dayes and monthes are neglected, cannot eaſe us, nor34 afford us line enough to fathom this bottom. The laſt refuge uſes to be, that prophane hiſtory can­not clear, but Scripture can. Which is the beſt,Bib. Sanct. l. 5. becauſe it is halfe true; But that the later part is true, or that God purpoſed to reveal it in his Book, it ſeems doubtfull, becauſe Sextus Senenſis reckons almoſt thirty ſeverall ſupputati­ons of the years between the Creation, and our bleſſed Savi­ours birth, all of accepted Au­thors, grounded upon the Scrip­tures; and Pererius confeſſes, he might have encreaſed the number by 20. And they who in a de­vout melancholy delight them­ſelves with this Meditation, that they can aſſigne the beginning of all Arts which we uſe for Neceſ­ſity or Ornament; and conclude, that men which cannot live with­out ſuch, were not long before ſuch inventions, forget both that many Nations want thoſe commo­dities yet, & that there are as great things periſh'd and forgoten, as are now remaining. Truly, the35 Creation and the laſt Judgement, are the Diluculum and Crepuſcu­lum, the Morning and the Even­ing twi-lights of the long day of this world. Which times, though they be not utterly dark, yet they are but of uncertain, doubtfull, and conjecturall light. Yet not equally; for the break of the day, becauſe it hath a ſucceſ­ſion of more and more light, is clearer then the ſhutting in, which is overtaken with more and more darkneſſe; ſo is the birth of the world more diſcernable then the death, becauſe upon this God hath caſt more clouds: yet ſince the world in her firſt infancy did not ſpeak to us at all (by any Authors;) and when ſhe began to ſpeak by Moſes, ſhe ſpake not plain, but diverſly to divers un­derſtandings; we muſt return a­gain to our ſtrong hold, faith, and end with this, That this Begin­ning was, and before it, Nothing. It is elder then darkneſſe, which is elder then light; And was be­fore Confuſion, which is elder36 then Order, by how much the univerſall Chaos preceded forms and diſtinctions. A beginning ſo near Eternity, that there was no Then, nor a minite of Time be­tween them. Of which, Eternity could never ſay, To morrow, nor ſpeak as of a future thing, becauſe this Beginning was the firſt point of time, before which, whatſoever God did, he did it unceſſantly and unintermittingly; which was but the generation of the Son, and proceſſion of the Spirit, and enjoy­ing one another; Things, which if ever they had ended, had begun; And thoſe be terms incompatible with Eternity. And therefore Saint Auguſtin ſays religiouſly and examplarily,Conf. l. 11. cap. 12. If one ask me what God did before this beginning, I will not anſwer, as another did merrily, He made Hell for ſuch buſie inquirers: But I will ſoo­ner ſay, I know not, when I know not, then anſwer that, by which he ſhall be deluded which asked too high a Myſtery, and he be prayſed, which anſwered a lie.

37

PART. 2.

NOw we have ended our Con­ſideration of this beginning, we will begin with that, which was before it, and was Author of it, God himſelf; and bend our thoughts firſt upon himſelf, then upon his Name, and then upon the particular Name here uſed, E­lohim.

Of God.

Men which ſeek God by rea­ſon, and naturall ſtrength, (though we do not deny common notions and generall impreſſions of a ſo­veraign power) are like Mariners which voyaged before the inven­tion of the Compaſs, which were but Coſters, and unwillingly left the ſight of the land. Such are they which would arrive at God by this world, and contemplate him onely in his Creatures, and ſeeming Demonſtration. Certain­ly, every Creature ſhewes God, as a glaſs, but glimeringly and tran­ſitiorily, by the frailty both of38 the receiver, and beholder: Our ſelves have his Image, as Medals, permanently and preciouſly deli­vered. But by theſe meditations we get no further, then to know what he doth, not what he is. But as by the uſe of the Compaſs, men ſafely diſpatch Ʋlyſſes dan­gerous ten years travell in ſo ma­ny dayes, and have found out a new world richer then the old; ſo doth Faith, as ſoon as our hearts are touched with it, direct and in­form it in that great ſearch of the diſcovery of Gods Eſſence, and the new Hieruſalem, which Rea­ſon durſt not attempt. And though the faithfulleſt heart is not ever directly, & conſtantly upon God, but that it ſomtimes deſcends alſo to Reaſon; yet it is thereby ſo de­parted from him, but that it ſtill looks towards him, though not fully to him: as the Compaſs is ever Northward, though it decline, and have often variations towards Eaſt, and Weſt. By this faith, as by reaſon, I know, that God is all that which all men can ſay39 of all Good; I beleeve he is ſome­what which no man can ſay nor know. For, ſi ſcirem quid Deus eſſet, Deus eſſem. For all acquired knowledg is by degrees, and ſucceſ­ſive; but God is impartible, and on­ly faith which can receive it all at once, can comprehend him. Canſt thou then, O my ſoul, when faith hath extended and enlarged thee, not as wind doth a bladder (which is the nature of humane learning) but as God hath diſplaid the Cur­tain of the firmament, and more ſpacionſly; for thou comprehendeſt that, and him which comprehends it: Canſt thou be ſatisfied with ſuch a late knowledg of God, as is gathered from effects; when even reaſon, which feeds upon the crums and fragments of appea­rances and veriſimilitudes, requires cauſes? Canſt thou rely and leane upon ſo infirm a knowledg, as is delivered by negations? Dyon. 2. ca. Coel. Hie­rar.And be­cauſe a devout ſpeculative man hath ſaid, Negationes de Deo ſunt verae, affirmationes autem ſunt in­convenientes, will it ſerve thy turn,40 to hear, that God is that which cannot be named, cannot be com­prehended, or which is nothing elſe? When every negation im­plyes ſome privation, which can­not be ſafely enough admitted in God; and is, beſides, ſo inconſide­rable a kind of proofe, that in ci­vill and judicall practice, no man is bound by it, nor bound to prove it. Can it give thee a­ny ſatisfaction, to hear God cal­led by concrete names, Good, Juſt, Wiſe; ſince theſe words can never be without confeſſing better, wi­ſer, and more juſt? Or if he be called Beſt, &c. or in ſuch phraſe, the higheſt degree reſpects ſome lower, and mean one: and are thoſe in God? Or is there a­ny Creature, any Degree of that Beſt, by which we ſhould call God? Or art thou got any nee­rer, by hearing him called Abſtra­ctly, Goodneſs; ſince that, and ſuch, are communicable, and daily applied to Princes? Art thou delighted with Arguments ariſing from Order, and Subordi­nation41 of Creatures, which muſt at laſt end in ſome one, which ends in none? Or from the preſer­vation of all this Univerſe, when men which have not had faith, and have oppoſed reaſon to reaſon, have eſcaped from all theſe, with­out confeſſing ſuch a God, as thou knoweſt; at leaſt, without ſeeing thereby, what he is? Have they furthered, or eaſed thee any more, who not able to conſider whole and infinit God, have made a par­ticular God, not only of every power of God, but of every be­nefit? And ſo filled the world (which our God alone doth bet­ter) with ſo many, that Varro could account 30000. and of them 300 Jupiters. Out of this pro­ceeded Dea febris, and Dea fraus, and Tenebris, and Onions, and Garlike. For the Egyptians, moſt abundant in Idolatry, were from thence ſaid to have Gods grow in their gardens. Apol. l. 5. And Ter­tullian, noting that Gods became mens Creatures, ſaid, Homo inci­pit eſſe propitius Deo, becauſe42 Gods were beholden to men for their being. And thus did a great Greek Generall, when he preſſed the Ilanders for mony, tell them, that he preſented two Gods, Vim & Suaſionem; and conformably to this they anſwered, that they op­poſed two Gods, Paupertatem & Impoſſibilitatem. And this mul­tiplicity of Gods may teach thee, that the reſultance of all theſe po­wers is one God, and that no place nor action is hid from him: but it teacheth not, who, nor what he is. And too particular and reſtrain'd are all thoſe deſcents of God in his word, when he ſpeaks of a body, and of paſſions, like ours. And ſuch alſo is their reverend ſilence, who have expreſſed God in Hie­roglyphicks, ever determining in ſome one power of God, without larger extent. And laſtly, can thy great capacity be fulfilled with that knowledg, which the Roman Church affords of God? which, as though the ſtate of a Monarchy were too terrible, and refulgent for our ſight, hath changed the43 Kingdome of heaven into an Oly­garchy; or at leaſt, given God leaſure, and deputed Maſters of his Requeſts, and Counſellers in his great Starr-chamber? Thou ſhalt not then, O my faithfull ſoul, deſpiſe any of theſe erroneous pictures, thou ſhalt not deſtroy, nor demoliſh their buildings; but thou ſhalt not make them thy foundation. For thou beleeveſt more then they pretend to teach, and art aſſur'd of more then thou canſt utter. For if thou couldeſt expreſs all which thou ſeeſt of God, there would be ſom­thing preſently beyond that. Not that God growes, but faith doth. For, God himſelf is ſo unutterable, that he hath a name which we can­not pronounce.

Of the Name of God.

Names are either to avoid confuſion, and diſtinguiſh par­ticulars, and ſo every day beget­ting new inventions, and the names often overliving the things, curious44 and entangled Wits have vexed themſelves to know, whether in the world there were more things or names;) But ſuch a name, God who is one needs not; Or elſe, names are to inſtruct us, and expreſs natures and eſſences. This Adam was able to do. And an enormous pretending Wit of our nation and age undertook to frame ſuch a language, herein exceeding Adam, that whereas he named every thing by the moſt eminent and virtuall property, our man gave names, by the firſt naked enuntiation whereof, any underſtanding ſhould compre­hend the eſſence of the thing, bet­ter then by a definition. And ſuch a name, we who know not Gods eſſence cannot give him. So that it is truly ſaid,Aq. 1. q. 13. Ar. 1. there is no name given by man to God, Ejus eſſen­tiam adaequatè repreſentans. And Hermes ſays humbly and reverent­ly,Dial. Aſ. clep. Non ſpero, I cannot hope, that the maker of all Majeſty, can be call'd by any one name, though compounded of many. I have45 therfore ſometimes ſuſpected, that there was ſome degree of pride, and overboldneſs, in the firſt na­ming of God; the rather, becauſe I marke, that the firſt which e­ver pronounced the name,Gen. 3.1. God, was the Divell; and preſently af­ter the woman;Gen. 4.1. who in the next chapter proceeded further, and firſt durſt pronounce that ſacred any myſtick name of foure letters. Gen. 32.29.For when an Angell did but Mi­niſterially repreſent God wraſt­ling with Jacob, he reproves Ja­cob, for asking his name; Cur quaeris nomen meum? And ſo alſo to Manoah, Why askeſt thou my Name, quod eſt mirabile? Jud. 13.18.And God, to dignify that Angell which he promiſes to lead his people, ſays, Fear him, provoke him not,Exod. 23.20. &c. For my Name is in him; but he tels them not what it is. But ſince, neceſſity hath enforced, and Gods will hath revealed ſome names. For in truth, we could not ſay this, God cannot be na­med, except God could be na­med. To handle the Myſteries46 of theſe names, is not for the ſtraitneſs of theſe leaves, nor of my ſtock. But yet I will take from Picus,Proem. in Heptap. thoſe words which his extream learning needed not, Ex lege, ſpicula linquuntur pau­peribus in meſſe, the richeſt and learnedſt muſt leave gleanings be­hind them. Omitting therefore Gods attributes, Eternity, Wiſdom, and ſuch; and his Names commu­nicable with Princes, and ſuch; there are two Names proper, and expreſſing his Eſſence: One im­poſed by us, God; The other ta­ken by God, the Name of four letters; for the Name, Lam, is derived from the ſame root. The Name impoſed by us, comes ſo near the other, that moſt Nations expreſs it in four letters; and the Turk almoſt as Miſtically as the Hebrew, in Abgd, almoſt in effably: And hence perchance was derived the Pythagorean oath, by the number of four. And in this alſo, that though it be gi­ven from Gods Works, not from his Eſſence, (for that is impoſſi­ble47 to us) yet the root ſignifies all this, Curare, Ardere,Aq. 1. q. 13. Ar. 8. and Con­ſiderare; and is purpoſed and in­tended to ſignifie as much the Eſ­ſence, as we can expreſs; and is never afforded abſolutely to any but God himſelf. And therefore Aquinas, after he had preferred the Name I am, above all,Ar. 11. both becauſe others were from formes, this from Eſſence; they ſignified ſome determined and limited pro­perty, this whole and entire God; and this beſt expreſſed, that no­thing was paſt, nor future to God; he adds, yet the Name, God, is more proper then this, and the Name of four letters more then that.

Tetragr. Reuclin. de verbo. Mi­rifico. l. 1. c. 6. 2 Pet. 1.4.Of which Name one ſays, that as there is a ſecret property by which we are changed into God, (referring, I think, to that, We are made partakers of the godly nature) ſo God hath a certain name, to which he hath annexed certain conditions, which being obſerved, he hath bound himſelf to be pre­ſent. This is the Name, which48 the Jews ſtubbornly deny ever to have been attributed to the Meſſi­as in the Scriptures. This is the name, which they ſay none could utter, but the prieſts, and that the knowledg of it periſhed with the Temple. And this is the name by which they ſay our Bleſſed Sa­viour did all his miracles, having learned the true uſe of it, by a Scedule which he found of Solo­mon's, and that any other, by that means, might do them.

How this name ſhould be ſoun­ded, is now upon the anvile,Jehovah. and every body is beating and ham­mering upon it. That it is not Jehova, this governs me, that the Septuagint never called it ſo; Nor Chriſt; nor the Apoſtles, where they vouch the old Teſta­ment; Nor Origen, nor Hierome, curious in language. And though negatives have ever their infirmi­ties, and muſt not be built on, this may, that our Fathers heard not the firſt ſound of this word Jehova. For (for any thing appearing,) Galatinus, in their Age, was the49 firſt that offered it. For, that Hierome ſhould name it in the ex­poſition of the eighth Pſalm,De Noie Tetrag. it is peremptorily averred by Druſius, and admitted by our learnedſt Do­ctor, that in the old Editions it was not Jehova. Rainolds de Idol. 2, 2, 18.But more then any other reaſon, this doth accompliſh & perfect the opinion againſt that word, that whereas that language hath no naturall vowels inſerted, but points ſubjected of the value and ſound of our vowels, added by the Maſorits, the Hebrew Cri­ticks, after Eſdras; and therefore they obſerve a neceſſity of ſuch a naturall and infallible concur­rence of conſonants, that when ſuch and ſuch conſonants meet, ſuch and ſuch vowels muſt be ima­gined, and ſounded, by which they have an Art of reading it without points; by thoſe rules,Genebr. de leg. Orient. ſiuepunctis. thoſe vowels cannot ſerve thoſe Conſonants, nor the name Jehova be built of thoſe four letters, and the vowels of Adonay.

Elohim.

Of the name uſed in this place,50 much needs not. But as old age is juſtly charged with this ſickneſs, that though it abound, it ever co­vets, though it need leſs then youth did: ſo hath alſo this decrepit age of the world ſuch a ſickneſs; for though we have now a clearer underſtanding of the Scriptures then former times, (for we inhe­rit the talents and travels of al Ex­poſitors, and have overlived moſt of the prophecies,) and though the groſs thick clouds of Aria­niſm be diſperſed, and ſo we have few enemies; yet we affect, and ſtrain at more Arguments for the Trinity, then thoſe times did, which needed them more. Here­upon hath an opinion, that by this name of God, Elohim, becauſe it is plurally pronounced in this place, and with a ſingular verbe, the Trinity is inſinuated, firſt of any begun by Peter Lumbard,L. 1. Sent. Diſt. 2. been ſince earneſtly purſued by Lyra, Galatin, and very many And becauſe Calvin, in a brave re­ligious ſcorn of this extortion, and beggarly wreſting of Scriptures,51 denyes this place, with others u­ſually offered for that point, to concern it, and his defender Pa­raeus denyes any good Author to approve it, Hunnius oppoſes Lu­ther, and ſome after,Antipar. fo. 9. but none before, to be of that opinion. But, leſt any ſhould think this a prevarication in me, or a purpoſe to ſhew the nakedneſs of the Fa­thers of our Church, by opening their diſagreeing, though in no fundamentall thing, I will alſo remember, that great pillars of the Roman Church differ with as much bitterneſs, and leſs rea­ſon in this point. For, when Cajetan had ſaid true, that this place was not ſo interpretable, but yet upon falſe grounds, That the word Elohim had no ſin­gular,Eloah. Job. 2. & 36. which is evidently falſe, Catharinus in his Animadver­ſions upon Cajetan, repre­hends him bitterly for his truth, and ſpies not his Errour: And though Toſtatus long before ſaid the ſame, and Lumbard were the firſt that writ the contrary, he52 denies any to have been of Caje­tan's opinion. It ſatisfies me, for the phraſe, that I am taught by collation of many places in the Scriptures, that it is a meer Idio­tiſm. And for the matter, that our Saviour never applyed this place to that purpoſe: And that I mark, the firſt place which the Fathers in the Nicen Councel ob­jected againſt Arius his Philoſo­pher, was, Faciamus hominem, and this never mentioned. Thus much of him, who hath ſaid, I have been found by them which have not ſought me:Iſa. 65. And therefore moſt aſſuredly in another place, If thou ſeek me, thou ſhalt finde me. I have adventured in his Name, upon his Name. Our next conſideration muſt be his moſt glorious worke which he hath yet done in any time, the Creation.

53

PART. 3.

MƲndum tradidit diſputatio­ni eorum,Sirac. 3.11 ut non inveniat homo opus quod operatus eſt Deus ab initio uſque ad finem. So that God will be glorified both in our ſearching theſe Myſteries, becauſe it teſtifies our livelineſs towards him, and in our not finding them. Lawyers, more then others, have ever been Tyrants over words, and have made them accept other ſignifications, then their nature enclined to. Hereby have Caſuiſts drawn the word Anathema, which is conſecrated or ſeparated, and ſe­parated or ſepoſed for Divine uſe, to ſignify neceſſarily accurſed, and cut off from the communion of the Church. Hereby Criminiſts have commanded Hereſie, which is but election, (and thereupon Paul gloryed to be of the ſtricteſt He­reſie, a Phariſee;Act. 6.5.) and the Scep­ticks were deſpiſed, becauſe they were of no Hereſie) to undertakeLaert.54 a capitall and infamous ſignifica­tion. Hereby alſo the Civiliſts have dignified the word Priviledge,Acacius de Privil. l. 1. cap. 1. whoſe ancienteſt meaning was, a law to the diſadvantage of any private man (and ſo Cicero ſpeaks of one baniſhed by priviledg, and lays the names, cruel and capitall upon Priviledg) and appointed it to expreſs only the favours and graces of Princes. Schoolmen, which have invented new things, and found out, or added Sub­urbs to Hell, will not be exceed­ed in this boldneſs upon words. As therefore in many other, ſo they have practiſed it in this word cre­are: which being but of an even nature with facere, or producere, they have laid a neceſſity upon it to ſignifie a Making of Nothing;Scot. 2. Sent. Diſt. 1. q. 5. Pererius. For ſo is Creation defined. But in this place neither the Hebrew nor Greek word afford it; neither is it otherwiſe then indifferently uſed in the holy books. Somtimes of things of a preexiſtent matter, He created man of Earth,Sirach. 17.1. and he created him a helper out of himſelf. 55Sometimes of things but then re­vealed, They are created now,Iſa. 48.7. and not of old. Sometimes of that, whereof God is neither Creator, nor Maker, nor Concurrent, as of Evill; faciens Pacem,Iſa. 45.5. & cre­ans malum: And ſometimes of that which was neither created nor made by God, nor any o­ther, as darkneſs, which is but pri­vation; formans bucem,Iſa. 54.7. & cre­ans tenebras. And the firſt that I can obſerve to have taken away the liberty of this word, and made it to ſignify, of Nothing,Aq. 1. q. 45 ar. 1. is our countryman Bede upon this place. For Saint Auguſtin was as oppoſite and diamitrall againſt it,Aug. contr. adverſ. leg. & proph. as it is againſt truth. For he ſays, fa­cere eſt quod omnino non erat; cre­are verò eſt, ex eo quod jam erat educendo conſtituere. Truly, it is not the power and victory of rea­ſon, that evicts the world to be made of Nothing; for neither this word creare inforces it, nor is it expreſsly ſaid ſo in any Scrip­ture. When Paul ſays himſelf to be Nothing,1 Cor. 22.11. it is but a diminuti­on56 on and Extenuation (not of him­ſelf, for he ſays there, I am not inferior to the very chief of the A­poſtles, but) of Mankind. Where it is ſaid to Man, Your making is of Nothing, it is but a reſpective, and comparative undervaluing;Iſa. 41.24. as in a lower deſcent then that be­fore, All Nations before God are leſs then Nothing. Iſa. 40.17.As in another place by a like extreme extending it is ſaid, Deus regnabit in aeter­num & ultra:Ex. 15.18. Only it is once ſaid,Machab. 2.7.28. Ex nihilo fecit omnia Deus; but in a book of no ſtraight obli­gation (if the matter needed au­thority) and it is alſo well tranſla­ted by us, Of things which were not. But therefore we may ſpare Di­vine Authority, and eaſe our faith too, becauſe it is preſent to our reaſon. For, Omitting the qua­relſome contending of Sextus Empiricus the Pyrrhonian, (of the Author of which ſect Laerti­us ſays, that he handled Philoſo­phy bravely, having invented a way by which a man ſhould de­termine nothing of every thing)57 who with his Ordinary weapon, a two-edged ſword, thinks he cuts off all Arguments againſt pro­duction of Nothing, by this, Non fit quod jam eſt, Nec quod non eſt;Ca. de Or­tu & inte­rit. nam non patitur mutationem quod non eſt; And omitting thoſe Ido­laters of Nature, the Epicureans, who pretending a mannerly loth­neſs to trouble God, becauſe Nec bene promeritis capitur,Lucret. nec tangitur ira, indeed out of their pride are loth to be beholden to God, ſay, that we are ſick of the fear of God,Horace. Quo morbo men­tem concuſſe? Timore Deorum; And cannot therefore admit crea­tion of Nothing, becauſe then Nil ſemine egeret, but ferre om­nes omnia poſſent, And ſubitò ex­orirentur, incerto ſpacio,Lucret. with ſuch other dotages. To make our ap­proches nearer, and batter effe­ctually, let him that will not con­feſs this Nothing, aſſign ſomthing of which the world was made. If it be of it ſelf, it is God: and it is God, if it be of God; who is alſo ſo ſimple, that it is impoſſible58 to imagine any thing before him of which he ſhould be compoun­ded, or any workman to do it. Boet. de Conſol. 5. proſ. 6. For to ſay, as one doth, that the world might be eternall, and yet not be God, becauſe Gods eter­nity is all at once, and the worlds ſucceſſive, will not reconcile it; for yet, ſome part of the world muſt be as old as God, and infi­nite things are equall, and equalls to God are God. The greateſt Dignity which we can give this world, is, that the Idaea of it is eter­nall, and was ever in God: And that he knew this world, not only Scientiâ Intellectus, by which he knows things which ſhall never be, and are in his purpoſe im­poſſible, though yet poſſible and contingent to us; but, after fai­ling, become alſo to our knowledg impoſſible, (as it is yet poſſible that you will read this book tho­row now, but if you diſcontinue it (which is in your liberty) it is then impoſſible to your know­ledge, and was ever ſo to Gods;) but alſo Scientiâ Viſionis,59 by which he knows only infalli­ble things; and therefore theſe Idaeas and eternall impreſſions in God, may boldly be ſaid to be God; for nothing underſtands God of it ſelf, but God; and it is ſaid, Intellectae Jynges à patre,Zoroaſt. O­racul. 4. intelligunt & ipſae: And with Zo­roaſter (if I miſconceive not) Jynx is the ſame as Idaea with Plato. The eternity of theſe Idaeas wrought ſo much, and obtained ſo high an eſtimation with Scotus, that he thinks them the Eſſence of this world, and the Creation was but their Exiſtence; which Reaſon and Scaliger reprehend roundly, when they do but ask him, whe­ther the Creation were only of ac­cidents.

But becauſe all which can be ſaid hereof is cloudy, and there­fore apt to be miſ-imagined, and ill interpreted, for, obſcurum lo­quitur quiſque ſuo perieulo, I will turn to certain and evident things; And tell thee, O man, which art ſaid to be the Epilogue, and com­pendium of all this world, and the60 Hymen and Matrimoniall knot of Eternal and Mortall things, whom one ſays to be all Creatures,Picus. be­cauſe the Goſpel, of which onely man is capable, is ſent to be prea­ched to all Creatures;Mar. 16. And waſt made by Gods hands, not his commandment; and haſt thy head erected to heaven, and all others to the Center; that yet on­ly thy heart of all others, points downwards, and onely trembles. And, oh ye chief of men, ye Princes of the Earth, (for to you eſpecially it is ſaid, Terram dedit filiis hominum; for the ſons of God have the leaſt portion there­of; And you are ſo Princes of the Earth, as the Divell is Prince of the Air, it is given to you to raiſe ſtorms of warr and perſecution) know ye by how few deſcents ye are derived from Nothing? you are the Children of the Luſt and Excrements of your parents, they and theirs the Children of Adam, the child of durt, the child of Nothing. Yea, our ſoul, which we magnify ſo much, and by61 which we conſider this, is a veryer upſtart then our body, being but of the firſt head, and immediate­ly made of Nothing: for how many ſouls hath this world, which were not nothing a hundred years ſince? And of whole man com­pounded of Body and Soul, the beſt, and moſt ſpirituall and deli­cate parts, which are Honour and Pleaſure, have ſuch a neighbour­hood and alliance with Nothing, that they lately were Nothing, and even now when they are, they are Nothing, or at leaſt ſhall quickly become Nothing: which, even at the laſt great fire, ſhall not befall the moſt wretched worme, nor moſt abject grain of duſt: for that fire ſhall be a puri­fier, not conſumer to nothing. For to be Nothing, is ſo deep a curſe, and high degree of puniſh­ment, that Hell and the priſoners there, not only have it not, but cannot wiſh ſo great a loſs to themſelves, nor ſuch a fruſtra­ting of Gods purpoſes. Even in Hell, where if our mind could62 contract and gather together all the old perſecutions of the firſt Church, where men were tormen­ted with exquiſite deaths, and of­tentimes more, by being denyed that; And all the inhumanities of the Inquiſition, where repen­tance encreaſeth the torture, (for they dy alſo, and loſe the com­fort of perſeverance;) And all the miſeries which the miſtakings, and furies, and ſloth of Princes, and infinity and corroſiveneſs of officers, the trechery of women, and bondage of reputation hath laid upon mankind, ſince it was, and diſtil the poyſon and ſtrength of all theſe, and throw it upon one ſoul, it would not equall the tor­ment of ſo much time as you ſound one ſyllable. And for the laſting, if you take as many of Plato's years, as a million of them hath minutes, and multi­ply them by Clavius his number, which expreſſes how many ſands would fill the hollowneſs to the firſt Mover,In Sacro­boſ. you were ſo far from proceeding towards the end, that63 you had not deſcribed one mi­nute. In Hell, I ſay, to eſcape which, ſome have prayed to have hils fall upon them, and many hor­rours ſhadowed in the Scriptures and Fathers, none is ever ſaid to have wiſhed himſelf Nothing. Indeed, as repoſedly, and at home within himſelf no man is an A­theiſt, however he pretend it, and ſerve the company with his bra­veries (as Saint Auguſtine ſayes of himſelf,Conf. l. 2. cap. 3. that though he knew nothing was blameable but vice, yet he ſeemed vicious, leſt he ſhould be blameable; and fain'd falſe vices when he had not true, leſt he ſhould be deſpiſed for his innocency;) ſo it is impoſſible that any man ſhould wiſh him­ſelf Nothing: for we can deſire nothing but that which ſeems ſa­tisfactory, and better to us at that time; and whatſoever is bet­ter, is ſomething. Doth, or can any man wiſh that, of which, if it were granted, he ſhould, even by his wiſhing it, have no ſenſe, nor benefit? To ſpeak truth free­ly64 there was no ſuch Nothing as this before the beginning: for, he that hath refin'd all the old Definitions, hath put this ingre­dient Creabile, (which cannot be abſolutely nothing) into his De­finition of Creation:Piccolo­min. Defin. Creat. And that Nothing which was, we cannot deſire; for mans will is not larger then Gods power; and ſince No­thing was not a pre-exiſtent mat­ter, nor mother of this All, but onely a limitation when any thing began to be; how impoſ­ſible is it to return to that firſt point of time, ſince God (if it im­ply contradiction) cannot reduce yeſterday? Of this we will ſay no more; for this Nothing being no creature, is more incompre­henſible then all the reſt: but we will proceed to that which is All, Heaven and Earth.

65

PART 4.

ONe ſayes in admiration of the ſpirit and ſublimeneſſe of Abbot Joachim his Works,Picus. that he thinks he had read the Book of life. Such an acquaintance as that ſhould he need, who would worthily expound or comprehend theſe words, Heaven and Earth. And Francis George in his Har­mony ſayes, That after he had cu­riouſly obſerved, that the Ark of Noah, and our body had the ſame proportion and correſpondency in their parts, he was angry, when he found after, that St Augu­ſtine had found out that before. So natural is the diſeaſe of Meum & Tuum to us, that even con­templative men, which have aban­don'd temporall propriety, are de­lighted, and have their Complacen­tiam, in having their ſpirituall Me­ditations and inventions knowne to be theirs: for, qui velit in­genio66 cedere, rarus erit. But be­cauſe to ſuch as I, who are but Interlopers, not ſtaple Merchants, nor of the company, nor within the commiſſion of Expoſitors of the Scriptures, if any licence be granted by the Spirit to diſcover and poſſeſſe any part, herein, it is condition'd and qualified as the Commiſſions of Princes, that we attempt not any part actually poſ­ſeſſ'd before, nor diſſeiſe others; therefore of theſe words, ſo abun­dantly handled, by ſo many, ſo learned, as no place hath been more traded to, I will expoſito­rily ſay nothing, but onely a lit­tle refreſh, what others have ſaid of them, and then contemplate their immenſity. Al opinions about theſe words, whether of Men too ſupple and ſlack, and ſo miſcarried with the ſtreame and tide of el­der Authority; or too narrow and ſlaviſh, and ſo coaſting ever within the view and protection of Philoſophy; or too ſingular, and ſo diſdaining all beaten paths, may fall within one of theſe ex­poſitions. 67Either in theſe words Moſes delivers roundly the intire Creation of all, and after doth but dilate and declare the Order; which is uſually aſſign'd to Chry­ſoſtome and Baſil, govern'd by the words in Gen. 2.4. In the day that the Lord God made the Earth and the Heavens; and of theſe, He that liveth for ever made all things together;Sirach. 18.1. and becauſe the literall interpretation of ſucceſsive dayes cannot ſubſiſt, where there are ſome dayes mention'd before the Creation of theſe Planets which made dayes. Or elſe, (which Auguſtine authorizeth) the Hea­ven ſignifies Angels, and the Earth Materiam primam, out of which all things were produc'd; which Averroes hath call'd Id ens quod mediat inter non eſſe penitus,In 1o Phyſ. 70. & eſſe Actu. And another hath affor­ded it a definition, which Divines have denied to God: for he ſays, Eſt nullum praedicamentum,Ariſt. 7. Met. Piccolom. de Defin. Mat. primae ne­que Negatio. And therfore that late Italian Diſtiller and Sublimer of old definitions hath riddled up­on68 it, That it is firſt and laſt; immortall and periſhable; for­med and formeleſſe; One, four, and infinite; Good, bad, and neither; becauſe it is ſuſceptible of all formes, and changeable in­to all. Or elſe Heaven muſt mean that Coelum Empyraeum (which ſome have thought to be increate, and nothing but the refulgence of God) which is exempt from all alteration even of motion; and the Earth to deſigne the firſt Matter. And in this channell came the tide of almoſt all accep­ted Expoſitors, till later ages ſom­what diverted it. For with, and ſince Lyra, (of whom his Apolo­giſt Dornike ſayes, Dilirat qui cum Lyra non ſentit) they agree much, that Heaven and Earth in this place, is the ſame which it is now; And that the ſubſtantiall forms were preſently in it diſtinct­ly, but other accidentall proper­ties added ſucceſſively. And ther­fore Aquinas having found dan­ger in theſe words,1. q. 65. Ar. 1. Praeceſſit in­formitas materiae ejus formatio­nem,69 expounds it, Ornatum, not formam. So that this Heaven and Earth, being themſelves and all between them, is this World; the common houſe and City of Gods and men, in Cicero's words;Nat. De­or. 2. and the corporeal and viſible image and ſon of the inviſible God, in the deſcription of the Academicks: which being but one, (for Ʋni­verſum eſt omnia verſa in unum) hath been the ſubject of Gods la­bor, and providence, and delight, perchance almoſt ſix thouſand yeares; whoſe uppermoſt firſt moving Orbe is too ſwift for our thoughts to overtake, if it diſpatch in every hour three thou­ſand times the compaſs of the Earth,Gilbert. de Magn. l. 6. c. 3. and this exceeds fifteen thouſand miles. In whoſe firma­ment are ſcattered more Eyes (for our uſe, not their owne) then any Cyphers can eſteeme or ex­preſſe. For, how weake a ſto­mack to digeſt knowledge, or how ſtrong and miſgovern'd faith againſt common ſenſe hath he, that is content to reſt in their70 number of 1022 Stars? whoſe nearer regions are illuſtrated with the Planets, which work ſo effectu­ally upon man, that they have of­ten ſtop'd his further ſearch, and been themſelves by him deified; And whoſe navell, this Earth, which cannot ſtir, for every other place is upwards to it, and is un­der the water, yet not ſurroun­ded, and is mans priſon and pal­lace, yea man himſelf, (for ter­ra eſt quam calco,Conf. 12. & terra quam porto, ſays Auguſtin:) A world, which when God had made, he ſaw it was very good; and when it became very bad, becauſe we would not repent, he did: and more then once; for he repented that he made it, and then that he deſtroyed it; becoming for our ſakes, who were unnaturally con­ſtant (though in ſinning) unna­turally changeable in affection: And when we diſ-eſteemed his be­nefits, and uſed not this world a­right, but rather choſe Hell, he, to dignify his own work, left Heaven it ſelf, to paſs a life in this71 world: Of the glory of which, and the inhabitants of it, we ſhall beſt end in the words of Sirach's Son, When we have ſpoken much,Ch. 43.27. we cannot attain unto them; but the ſum of all is, that God is all. But becauſe, as the ſame man ſays, When a man hath done his beſt,Cha. 18.6. he muſt begin again; and when he thinks to come to an end, he muſt go again to his labour; let us further conſider what love we may bear to the world: for, to love it too much, is to love it too little; as overprayſing is a kind of libelling. For a man may oppreſs a favorite or officer with ſo much commen­dation, as the Prince neglected and diminiſhed thereby, may be jealous, and ruine him. Ambaſ­ſadours in their firſt acceſſes to Princes, uſe not to apply them­ſelves, nor divert their eye upon any, untill they have made their firſt Diſpatch, and find themſelves next the Prince; and after ac­knowledg and reſpect the beams of his Majeſty in the beauties and dignities of the reſt. So ſhould72 our ſoul do, between God, and his Creatures; for what is there in this world immediately and pri­marily worthy our love, which (by acceptation) is worthy the love of God? Earth and Heaven are but the foot-ſtool of God: But Earth it ſelf is but the foot­ball of wiſe men. How like a Strumpet deales this world with the Princes of it? Every one thinks he poſſeſſeth all, and his ſervants have more at her hand then he; and theirs, then they. They think they compaſs the Earth, and a Job is not within their reach. Malaguz­zi. Theſo. Polit. par. 2. fo. 60. A buſie Wit hath ta­ken the pains to ſurvey the poſſeſ­ſions of ſome Princes: & he tels us, that the Spaniſh King hath in Eu­rope almoſt three hundred thou­ſand miles, and in the new world ſeaven millions, beſides the bor­ders of Africk, and all his Ilands: And we ſay, the Sun cannot hide himſelf from his Eye, nor ſhine out of his Dominions. Yet let him meaſure right, and the Turke exceeds him, and him the Perſi­an;73 the Tartar him, and him Prete-Jan. There came an E­dict from the Emperour (ſaith the Goſpel) that the whole world ſhould be taxed:Luk. 2.1. And when the Biſhop of Rome is covetous of one treaſure, and expenſive of another, he gives and applies to ſome one the Indulgences Ʋrbis & Orbis. And alas, how many greater King­domes are there in the world, which know not that there is ſuch a Biſhop or Emperour? Ambiti­on reſts not there: The Turke, and leſs Princes, have ſtiled them­ſelves King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, and choſen to God. Chri­ſtian Princes, in no impure times, have taken (nay given to them­ſelves)aaJuſtinian. Proem. Numen noſtrum, andbbAcacius l. 1. c. 6. Caſſā. Cat. glo. Mud. P. 5. Conſ. 24.50. Divina Oracula, and Sacra Scripta to their Laws. Of them alſo ſome ſpeak ſo tremblingly, that they ſay, to diſpute their A­ctions is ſacriledg. And theirccDe nova forma fide­lit. c. 1. Extra Jo. 22. ca. cum Intergloſſ. Baldus ſays of him, Eſt omnia, & ſuper omnia, & facit ut Deus; habet enim coeleſte arbitrium. But more roundly the Canoniſts of74 their Biſhop, Qui negat Domi­num Deum noſtrum Papam, &c. which title the Emperour Conſtan­tine alſo long before afforded him. Diſtin. 96. l. Satis. And Mar­tial to Do­mitian, l. 8.2. But alas, what are theſe our fellow-ants, our fellow-durt, our fellow-nothings, compared to that God whom they make but their pattern? And how little have any of theſe, compared to the whole Earth? whoſe hills, though they erect their heads beyond the Country of Meteors, and ſet their foot, in one land, and caſt their ſhadow into another, are but as warts upon our face: And her vaults, and caverns, the bed of the winds, and the ſecret ſtreets and paſſages of al rivers, and Hel it ſelf, though they afford it three thou­ſand great miles,Munſter l. 1. c. 16. are but as ſo many wrinkles, and pock-holes. A prince is Pilot of a great ſhip, a Kingdome; we of a pinnace, a family, or a leſs skiff, our ſelves: and howſoever we be toſſed, we cannot periſh; for our haven (if we will) is even in the midſt of the Sea; and where we dy, our home75 meet us. If he be a lion and live by prey, and waſt amongſt Ce­dars and pines, and I a mole, and ſcratch out my bed in the ground, happy in this, that I cannot ſee him: If he be a butterfly, the ſon of a Silkworm, and I a Sca­rab, the ſeed of durt; If he go to execution in a Chariot, and I in a Cart or by foot, where is the glo­rious advantage? If I can have (or if I can want) thoſe things which the Son of Sirach calls principall, water, fire, and iron,C. 39.26. ſalt and meal, wheat and hony, milk, and the blood of grapes, oyle, and clothing; If I can prandere Olus,Horace. and ſo need not Kings; Or can uſe Kings, and ſo need not prandere Olus: In one word, if I do not frui (which, is, ſet my delight, and affection only due to God) but Ʋti the Creatures of this world,Lombard. l. 1. Diſt. 1. this world is mine; and to me belong thoſe words, Subdue the Earth,Gen. 1.28. and rule over all Creatures; and as God is proprietary, I am uſu­fructuarius of this Heaven and76 Earth which God created in the beginning. And here, becauſe Nemo ſilens placuit,Auſon. multi brevita­te, ſhall be the end.

O Eternall and Almighty pow­er, which being infinite, haſt enabled a limited creature, Faith, to comprehend thee; And being, even to Angels but a paſſive Mirror and looking-glaſſe, art to us an Active gueſt and domeſtick, (for thou haſt ſaid, I ſtand at the door and knock,Rev. 3.20. if any man hear me, and open the doore, I will come in unto him, and ſup with him, and he with me, and ſo thou dwellſt in our hearts; And not there only, but even in our mouths; for though thou beeſt greater, and more remov'd, yet humbler and more communicable then the Kings of Egypt, or Roman Emperours, which diſdain'd their particular diſtinguiſhing Names, for Pha­raoh and Caeſar, names of confuſi­on; haſt contracted thine immenſi­ty, and ſhut thy ſelfe within Syl­lables, and accepted a Name from77 us; O keep and defend my tongue from miſuſing that Name in light­neſſe, paſſion, or falſhood; and my heart, from miſtaking thy Na­ture, by an inordinate preferring thy Juſtice before thy Mercy, or ad­vancing this before that. And as, though thy ſelf hadſt no beginning thou gaveſt a beginning to all things in which thou wouldſt be ſerved and glorified; ſo, though this ſoul of mine, by which I partake thee, begin not now, yet let this minute, O God, this happy minute of thy viſitation, be the beginning of her converſion, and ſhaking away confuſion, dark­neſſe, and barrenneſſe; and let her now produce Creatures, thoughts, words, and deeds agreeable to thee. And let her not produce them, O God, out of any contemplation, or (I cannot ſay, Idaea, but) Chime­ra of my worthineſſe, either be­cauſe I am a man and no worme, and within the pale of thy Church, and not in the wild forreſt, and en­lightned with ſome glimerings of Naturall knowledge; but meerely out of Nothing: Nothing prexiſ­tent78 in her ſelfe, but by power of thy Divine will and word. By which, as thou didſt ſo make Hea­ven, as thou didſt not neglect Earth, and madeſt them anſwe­rable and agreeable to one another, ſo let my Soul's Creatures have that temper and Harmony, that they be not by a miſdevout conſide­ration of the next life, ſtupidly and trecherouſly negligent of the of­fices and duties which thou enjoyneſt amongst us in this life; nor ſo an­xious in theſe, that the other (which is our better buſineſs, though this alſo muſt be attended) be the leſs endeavoured. Thou haſt, O God, denyed even to Angells, the ability of arriving from one Extreme to a­nother, without paſſing the mean way between. Nor can we paſs from the priſon of our Mothers womb, to thy palace, but we muſt walk (in that pace whereto thou haſt enabled us) through the ſtreet of this life, and not ſleep at the firſt corner, nor in the midſt. Yet ſince my ſoul is ſent immediately from thee, (let me for her return) rely,79 not principally, but wholly upon thee and thy word: and for this body, made of preordained matter, and inſtruments, let me ſo uſe the ma­teriall means of her ſuſtaining, that I neither neglect the ſeeking, nor grudge the miſſing of the Conveni­encies of this life: And that for fame, which is a mean Nature between them, I ſo eſteem opinion, that I deſpiſe not others thoughts of me, ſince moſt men are ſuch, as most men think they be: nor ſo reverence it, that I make it alwayes the rule of my Actions. And becauſe in this world my Body was firſt made, and then my Soul, but in the next my ſoul ſhall be first, and then my body, In my Exterior and morall converſation let my firſt and preſen­teſt care be to give them ſatisfaction with whom I am mingled, becauſe they may be ſcandaliz'd, but thou, which ſeest hearts, canſt not: But for my faith, let my firſt relation be to thee, becauſe of that thou art justly jealous, which they cannot be. Grant theſe requests, O God, if I have asked fit things fitly, and80 as many more, under the ſame li­mitations, as are within that prayer which (As thy Manna, which was meat for all tasts, and ſerved to the appetite of him which took it, and was that which every man would) includes all which all can aske,Sap. 16.20 Our Father which art, &c.

81
EXODUS C. 1. V. 1. Now theſe are the Names of the Children of Iſrael which came into Egypt, &c.

IN this book our en­trance is a going out:Of Exodus for Exodus is Exci­tus. The Meditati­on upon Gods works is infinite; and whatſoever is ſo, is Circular, and returns into it ſelfe, and is every where begin­ning and ending, and yet no where either: Which the Jews (the children of God by his firſt ſpouſe the Law, as we are by Grace, his ſecond) expreſſ'd in their round Temples; for God82 himſelfe is ſo much a Circle, as being every where without any corner, (that is, never hid from our Inquiſition;) yet he is no where any part of a ſtraight line, (that is, may not be directly and preſently beheld and contempla­ted) but either we muſt ſeek his I­mage in his works, or his will in his words; which, whether they be plain or darke, are ever true, and guide us aright. For, aſ­well the Pillar of Cloud, as that of Fire, did the Office of directing. Yea, oftentimes, where feweſt Ex­poſitors contribute their helpes, the Spirit of God alone enligh­tens us beſt; for many lights caſt many ſhadows, and ſince contro­verted Divinity became an occu­pation,Contro­verſies. the Diſtortions and vio­lencing of Scriptures, by Chri­ſtians themſelves, have wounded the Scriptures more, then the old Philoſophy or Turciſm. So that that is applyable to us, which Se­neca ſays of Cſaears murderers, Plures amici quam inimici eum interfecerunt. From which indul­gence83 to our own affections, that ſhould ſomwhat deterr us, which Pliny ſays of the ſame buſineſs, I­iſdem pugionibus quibus Caeſarem interfecerunt, ſibi mortem conſci­verunt. For we kill our own ſouls certainly, when we ſeek paſſionate­ly to draw truth into doubt and diſputation.

I do not (I hope) in underta­king the Meditation upon this verſe, incur the fault of them,Shore Texts. who for oſtentation and magnify­ing their wits, excerpt and tear ſhapeleſs and unſignificant rags of a word or two, from whole ſen­tences, and make them obey their purpoſe in diſcourſing; The Soul­diers would not divide our Savi­ours garment, though paſt his uſe and his propriety. No gar­ment is ſo neer God as his word: which is ſo much his, as it is he. His fleſh, though dignified with un­expreſſible priviledges, is not ſo near God, as his word: for that is Spiritus Oris. And in the In­carnation, the Act was onely of one Perſon, but the whole Trini­ty84 ſpeaks in every word. They therefore which ſtub up theſe ſe­verall roots, and mangle them into chips, in making the word of God not ſuch,Literall Senſe. (for the word of God is not the word of God in any other ſenſe then literall (and that alſo is not the literall, which the letter ſeems to preſent, for ſo to diverſe underſtandings there might be diverſe literall ſenſes; but it is called literall, to diſtin­guiſh it from the Morall, Allegori­call, and the other ſenſes; and is that which the Holy Ghoſt doth in that place principally intend:) they, I ſay, do what they can this way, to make God, whoſe word it is pretended to be, no God. They which build, muſt take the ſolid ſtone, not the rubbiſh. Of which, though there be none in the word of God, yet often un­ſincere tranſlations, to juſtifie our perjudices and foreconceived o­pinions, and the underminings and batteries of Hereticks, and the curious refinings of the Alle­goricall Fathers, which have made85 the Scriptures, which are ſtronge toyles, to catch and deſtroy the bore and bear which devaſt our Lords vineyard, fine cobwebs to catch flies; And of ſtrong gables, by which we might anker in all ſtorms of Diſputation and Perſe­cution, the threads of ſilkworms, curious vanities and exceſſes (for do not many among us ſtudy even the Scriptures only for ornament?) theſe, I ſay, may ſo bruſe them, and raiſe ſo much duſt, as may blinde our Eyes, and make us ſee no­thing, by coveting too much. He which firſt invented the cut­ting of Marble, had (ſays Pliny) importunum ingenium; a wit that would take no anſwer nor denyal. So have they which break theſe Sentences, importuna ingenia, unſeaſonable and murmuring ſpi­rits. When God out of his a­bundance affords them whole Sentences, yea Chapters, rather then not have enough to break to their auditory, they will at­tempt to feed miraculouſly great Congregations with a loafe or86 two, and a few fiſhes; that is, with two or three incoherent words of a Sentence. I remem­ber I have read of a General, who, having at laſt carryed a town, yet not meerly by force, but upon this article, That in ſign of ſubje­ction they ſhould admit him to take away one row of ſtones round about their wall, choſe to take the undermoſt row, by which the whole wall ruined. So do they demoliſh Gods faireſt Temple, his Word, which pick out ſuch ſtones, and deface the integrity of it, ſo much, as nei­ther that which they take, nor that which they leave, is the word of God. In the Temple was admit­ted no ſound of hammer, nor in the building of this great patri­archal Catholick Church, of which every one of us is a little chappel, ſhould the word be otherwiſe wre­ſted or broken, but taken intire­ly as it is offered and preſented. But I do not at this time trangreſs this rule,Of this Text. both becauſe I made not choice of this unperfect ſentence,87 but proſecute my firſt purpoſe of taking the beginning of every book: and becauſe this verſe is not ſo unperfect, but that radically and virtually it comprehends all the book; which being a hi­ſtory of Gods miraculous Mercy to his, is beſt intimated or Epi­tomized in that firſt part, which is inſinuated in this verſe, from how ſmall a number he propaga­ted ſo great a Nation. Upon this confidence, and conſcience of purpoſing good,Unvocall preaching. I proceed in theſe Sermons; for they are ſuch, in the allowance of him whom they have ſtiled reſolutiſſimum et Chri­ſtianiſſimum Doctorem;Gerſ. de laude Scr. conſid. 1a. for he ſays Scriptor manu praedicat. And that to write books, though one gain and profit temporally by it, yet if the finall reſpect be the glory of God, is latriae veneratio, and more honorable to the Church, then the multiplication of vocal prayers, I­mo, quam inſolens Miſſarum incul­catio. Did the Author of that book, the Preacher, make vocal Sermons? Though theſe lack thus much of88 Sermons, that they have no Au­ditory, yet as Saint Bernard did almoſt glory, that Okes and Bee­ches were his Maſters, I ſhall be content that Okes and Beeches be my ſchollers, and witneſſes of my ſolitary Meditations. There­fore,Diviſion. after I ſhal have ſpoken a few words in generall of this book, I will proceed to a neerer conſide­ration of this verſe; firſt, As it begins to preſent a Regiſter of their Names, whom God appoin­ted to be the foundation of his many great works; And then, As it doth virtually comprehend thoſe particular teſtimonies of Gods love to his people.

In the firſt, we will look Why God is willing, that thoſe through whom God prepares his miracles, ſhould be named. Secondly, why they are in divers places diverſly named. Then, why their number is expreſſed; And why that alſo diverſly, in divers places. And laſtly, whether there bee no My­ſtery in their Number, Se­venty.

89In the ſecond part, wherein out of this verſe radically will ariſe to our conſideration, all his favors to his choſen, expreſſed in this book, we ſhall have occaſion to contem­plate Gods Mercy, and that, In bringing them into Egypt, In pro­pagating them there, In delive­ring them from thence, and in nouriſhing them in the wilderneſs. Secondly his Power, Expreſſed in his many Miracles: Thirdly his Juſtice, in their preſſures in Egypt, and the wilderneſs: And laſtly his Judgments, in af­fording them a law for their di­rection.

Exodus.

When this Book became a par­ticular book, that is,Of Moſes five Books when Mo­ſes his book was divided into five parts, I cannot trace. Not only the firſt Chriſtian Councells, which eſtabliſh'd or declared the Canon of Scripture, and all the earlyeſt Expoſitors thereof, whe­ther Chriſtians or Jews, but the90 Septuagint, almoſt 300. years before Chriſt, acknowledge this partition. Yet, that Moſes left it a continued work, or at leaſt not thus diſtributed, it ſeems e­vident, both becauſe the Hebrew names of theſe books are not ſig­nificant, but are only the firſt words of the book, (as we uſe to cite the Imperiall and the Canon laws) And becauſe by Conradus Pellicanus I am taught,Comment. in Pentat. that Mo­ſes, according to the 52. Hebdo­mades, diſtinguiſhed the Penta­teuch into ſo many ſections, of which this is the 13. And Joſephus Simlerus notes, that the firſt letter here, which ordinarily hath no uſe, but grace, hath in this place the force of a conjunction. And ſo Lyra, and many others ac­knowledg, that this is but a con­tinuing of the former Hiſtory Beſides the reaſons which moved thoſe times to make this a ſingu­lar Book, I may add this, That God, when he had in that part of Moſes book which we call Ge­neſis, expreſſed fully, that by cre­ating91 from Nothing, before Na­ture was, he needed not her to begin his glorious work; ſo in this he declares eſpecially, that he hath not ſo aſſumed Nature into a Collegueſhip with himſelf, that he cannot leave her out, or go be­ſides her, and neglect her, or go directly againſt her when it plea­ſes him. And therefore this book is, more then any other, a Regiſter of his Miracles. Of which book this is notable, it conſiſting of the moſt particular ceremoniall parts, wherein the Jews yet perſiſt, and we faithfully ſee already ac­compliſhed, and therefore likely­eſt to miniſter matter of quarrell and difference between us, of all other books in the Bible, is beſt a­greed upon; and fewer differen­ces between ours and their Copies then in any other book: ſo equally careful have al parties been to pre­ſerve the Records of his Miracles intemerate.

92

PART. 1.

I Come now to the firſt Part:Names. In which, the firſt Conſide­ration is, Why God would have them named? Theſe are the Names,Antiq. l. 2. c. 4. &c. Joſephus de­livering the ſame Hiſtory, ſayes, that he would not have aſcribed the Names, becauſe they are of an hard and unpleaſant ſound, but that ſome had defamed the Nati­on, as Egyptians; and denyed them to be Meſopotamians. It hath therefore one good uſe, to diſtinguiſh them from profane Nations: But the chiefeſt is, That they are inſerted into this Book for an everlaſting honour both to God and them. Amongſt men, all Depoſitaries of our Memories, all means which we have truſted with the preſerving of our Names, putrifie and periſh. Of the infinite numbers of the Medals of the Emperors, ſome one haypy An­tiquary,93 with much pain, travell, coſt, and moſt faith, beleeves he hath recovered ſome one ruſty piece, which deformity makes reverend to him, and yet is indeed the freſh work of an Impoſtor.

The very places of the Obeliſes, and Pyramides are forgotten, and the purpoſe why they were erect­ed. Books themſelves are ſubject to the mercy of the Magiſtrate: and as though the ignorant had not been enemie enough for them, the Learned unnaturally and treacherouſly contribute to their deſtruction, by raſure and miſ-interpretation. Caligula would aboliſh Homer, Virgil, and all the Lawyers Works, and eter­nize himſelf and his time in Me­dals: The Senate, after his death, melted all them: Of their braſſe his Wife Meſſalina made the Statue of her beloved Player; and where is that? But Names ho­nour'd with a place in this book, cannot periſh, becauſe the Book cannot. Next to the glory of having his name entred into the94 Book of Life, this is the ſecond, to have been matriculatted in this Regiſter, for an example or inſtru­ment of good. Lazarus his name is enrolled, but the wicked rich mans omitted. How often in the Scriptures is the word Name, for honour, fame, vertue? How often doth God accurſe with aboliſhing the Name? Thou ſhalt deſtroy their Name, Deut. 7.24. And, I wil deſtroy their Name de ſub coelo, Deut. 9.14. And, Non ſeminabitur de Nomine tuo, Nah. 1.14. With which curſe alſo the civill Epheſi­an Law puniſhed the burner of the Temple, that none ſhould name him. And in the ſame phraſe doth God expreſſe his bleſſings to Abraham, Gen. 12.2. and often elſewhere, I will make thy Name great. Which, without God, thoſe vaine attempters of the Tower of Babel endeavoured: for it is ſaid, Gen. 11.4. They did it, to get themſelves a Name. Whether Nomen be Novimen, or Notamen, it is ſtill to make one known: and God, which cannot be known by95 his own Name, may nearlyeſt by the names and proſperity of his. And therefore, for his own ſake, he is carefull to have his ſervants named. He calleth his own ſheep by name; And,Joh. 10. Scribe Nomen Diei hujus, ſays he to Ezekiel, c. 24.2. Of all Nations, the Jews have moſt chaſtly preſerved that Ceremony of abſtaining from ethnick Names. Ethnick Names.At this time, when by their preſ­ſures they need moſt to deſcend to that common degree of flattery, to take the names of the Princes by whoſe leave they live, they do not degenerate into it, when al­moſt all Chriſtendom hath ſtrai­ed into that ſcandalous faſhion, of returning to heathen Names, as though they were aſhamed of their Examples. And almoſt in all their Names, the Jews have either teſtified ſome event paſt, or pro­phecied or prayed for ſome good to come:Significant. Names. In no language are Names ſo ſignificant. So that if one conſider diligently the ſeneſ of the Names regiſter'd here, he will not ſo ſoon ſay, That the96 Names are in the Hiſtory, as that the Hiſtory is in the Names. For, Levi is coupled to God, which notes Gods calling. Simeon, hea­ring and obedient, where their willingneſs is intimated. Juda is confeſſing and praiſing, which re­ſults of the reſt. Zebulon is a dwelling, becauſe they are eſta­bliſhed in God: in whom, be­cauſe they have both a Civill poli­cy, and a Military, Dan is a Judg­ment, and Gad, a Garriſon. In which, that they may be exerci­ſed in continual occaſions of meri­ting, Naphthali is a wreſtling. And to crown all, Aſher is complete bleſ­ſedneſs. The other Names have their peculiar force, which will not come into this room: but I entred the rather into this Medi­tation and opinion, becauſe I find the Scriptures often to allude to the Name, and ſomtimes expreſs it, as 1 Sam. 25.25. As his name is, ſo is he, Nabal, a fool. And in Exod. 15.23. Therefore the name of the place was called bitter. And the Romans alſo had ſo much reſpect to the97 ominouſneſs of good Names, that when in Muſters every Souldier was to be called by Name,Cic. l. 1. de Divinat. they were diligent to begin with one of a good and promiſing Name, which Feſtus reckons to be Vale­rius, Salvius, Statorius, and ſuch. And I have read in ſome of the Criminaliſts, that to have an ill Name, in this ſenſe, not malae famae, was Judicium ad torturam. Hom. 8. in Gen.Origen exaggerating pathetically the gradations of Abraham's ſorrow at the immolation of his ſon, after he hath expoſtulated with God why he would remem­ber him of the Name ſon, and why of Beloved ſon, reſts moſt upon the laſt, that he would call him by his Name Iſaac, which ſignifies joy, in a commandement of ſo much bitterneſs. It may be then ſome occaſion of naming them in this place, that as theſe men were inſtruments of this work of God, ſo their names did ſub-obſcurely foreſignifie it. For Reaſon, the common ſoul to all lawes, forbids that either great98 puniſhments ſhould be inflicted otherwiſe then Nominatim; Non niſi nominatim liberi exheredandi:Briſſ. form. ſo. 604. Or that great benefits ſhould be in any other ſort conferr'd. For conformably to this caſe, which now we conſider, of delivering perſons from bondage, the law is,Lex Fuſ. Can. Servis non niſi Nominatim li­bertas danda eſt. Of this Honour to his ſervants, to be remembred by Name, God hath been ſo dili­gent, that ſomtimes himſelf hath impoſed the Name before the birth,Changed Names. and ſomtimes changed it to a higher ſignification, when he purpoſed to exalt the perſon. It is noted,Fr. George pro fo. 17. that to Abram's Name he added a letter, whoſe number made the whole Name equall to the words, Creavit Hominem. So that the multiplying of his ſeed, was a work not inferior to the Creation. And from Sarai's Name he took a letter, which expreſſed the num­ber ten, and repos'd one, which made but five; ſo that ſhe contribu­ted that five which man wanted be­fore, to ſhew a mutuall indigence99 and Supplement. How much Schiſmatick diſputation hath pro­ceeded from the change of Si­mon's Name into Peter? Mat. 15.What a Majeſtick change had James and John into the Sons of Thunder?Mar. 13. yet God not only forbore ever ſuch vaſt Names, as Pharaoh gave Joſeph,Ge. 41.41. which is not only Ex­pounder of ſecrets,Addition to Names. but Saviour of the world: which alſo the Ro­man Emperors aſſumed in many Coyns, (AEternitas Caeſaris, And Caeſar ſalus, And Servator, And Reſtaurator Orbis;) but (to my remembrance, and obſervation) he never added other Name, as a pronomen, or cognomen, or ſuch: To ſhew (I think) that man brought not part of his Dignity, and God added; but that God, when he will change a man, be­gins, and works, and perfects all himſelf. For though corrupt cu­ſtome hath authoriſed it now, And,Robortellus de Nomi­nibus. Gaudent pronomine molles auriculae; yet the Romans them­ſelves, from whom we have this burden of many Names, till they100 were mingled with the Sabius, u­ſed but one Name. Politianus Miſcel. c. 31And before that Cuſtom got to be noble, their ſlaves, only when they were manumitted, were forced to ac­cept three names. In this Exceſs of Names the Chriſtians have ex­ceeded their patterns: for to o­mit the vain and empty fulneſs in Paracelſus Name, which of the Ancients equalls that grave, wiſe Author, which writes himſelf, Pulmannus Anicius Manlius Torquatus Severinus Boethius? But God hath barely and nakedly, but permanently engrav'd theſe Names. Which ſhall never be ſubject to that obſcurity, which Auſonius imputes to one who was Maſter to an Emperor, and re­warded with a Conſulſhip, but overſwaid with his Colleague, that men were fain to inquire, Quibus Conſulib. geſſerit conſulatum. But whereſoever theſe Names ſhall be mentioned, the Miraculous Hiſtory ſhall be call'd to memory; And whereſoever the Hiſtory is remem­bred, their Names ſhall be refreſhd.

101

Diverſity in Names.

Our next conſideration is, Why they are diverſly named? and not alwayes alike, in Gen. 46. and here, and in Deuteronomy, and the other places where they are ſpoken of? And this belongs not only to this caſe, but to many others in the Holy Bible. Joſua and Jeſus is all one. So is Chonia, and Jechonias. And how multinominous is the father in law of Moſes? And the name Nebrycadrozor is obſerv'd to be written ſeven ſeverall wayes in the Prophets. To change the Name, in the party himſelf is, by many laws, Dolus; and when a Notary doth it, he is falſarius; faults penall and infamous. And therefore laws have provided, that in inſtruments of contract, and in publick Regiſters, all the Names, Sur-names and additions ſhall be inſerted; and they forbid Abbre­viations; and they appoint a more conſpicuous and more permanent Character to expreſs them. So ne­ceſſary102 is a certainty and conſtan­cy in the Names. Some late inter­preters of the law,Acacius de privil. Ju­ris. teach, that falſe Latin in Grammer, in Edicts or Reſcripts from the Imperiall Chamber, or any other ſecular Prince or Court, doth not anni­hilate or vitiate the whole writing, becauſe all they may be well e­nough preſum'd not to under­ſtand Latine; But the Bulls of the Popes, and decrees in the Court of Rome are defeated and annulled by ſuch a corruption, becauſe their ſufficiency in that point being preſumed, it ſhall be juſtly thought ſubreptitious, what ever iſſues faulty and defective in that kind. So, though Error and variety in Names, may be pardonable in profane Hiſtories, eſpecially ſuch as tranſlate from Authors of other language, yet the wiſdome and conſtancy of that one Author of al theſe books, the Holy Ghoſt, is likely to de­fend and eſtabliſh all his inſtru­ments, choſen for building this frame of Scriptures, from any un­certaine103 waverng and vacilla­tion.

The Cabaliſts therfore, which are the Anatomiſts of words, and have a Theologicall Alchimy to draw ſoveraigne tinctures and ſpi­rits from plain and groſſe literall matter, obſerve in every variety ſome great myſtick ſignification; but ſo it is almoſt in every He­brew name and word. Lyra, who is not ſo refined, yet very Judaick too, thinks, that as with the Latin, Cholaus, Choletus, Cholinus, and Nicolaus is one Name; ſo it is in the variation of names in the Scriptures. But of­tentimes, neither the ſound, nor letter, nor ſignification, nor be­ginning nor ending, nor roote, nor branch, have any affinity: as himſelfe (though corrupt­ly) ſays, that Eſau; Seir, and Edom are one name. Gen. 36.It may be ſome lazineſs to anſwer every thing thus, It is ſo, becauſe God would have it ſo; yet he which goes further, and asks, Why Gods will was ſo, inquires for104 ſomething above God. For, find me ſomething that enclines God, and I will worſhip that. ſince therefore this variety of Names fals out in no place, where the certainty of the perſon or Hi­ſtory is therby offuſcate, I encline to think, that another uſefull do­cument ariſes from this admitting of variety; which ſeems to me to be this,Difference in things not eſſen­tiall. that God in his eternall & ever-preſent omniſcience, fore-ſeeing that his univerſal, Chriſtian, Catholick Church, imaged, and conceived, and begotten by him in his eternall decree, born and brought to light when he travail'd and labored in thoſe bitter agonies and throes of his paſſion, nourced ever more dilicately and preciouſ­ly then any natural children, (for they are fed with their Mothers blood in their womb, but we with the blood of our moſt Bleſſed Sa­viour all our lives,) fore-ſeeing, I ſay, that this his dearly beloved Spouſe, and Siſter, and Daugh­ter, the Church, ſhould in her latter Age ſuffer many convulſi­ons,105 diſtractions, rents, ſchiſms, and wounds, by the ſevere and unrectified Zeal of many, who ſhould impoſe neceſſity upon in­different things, and oblige all the World to one preciſe forme of exterior worſhip, and Eccleſi­aſtick policie; averring that eve­ry degree, and minute and ſcruple of all circumſtances which may be admitted in either beleif or pra­ctice, is certainly, conſtantly, ex­preſsly, and obligatorily exhibi­ted in the Scriptures; and that Grace, and Salvation is in this u­nity and no where elſe; his Wiſ­dome was mercifully pleaſ'd, that thoſe particular Churches, devout parts of the Univerſall, which, in our Age, keeping ſtill the foun­dation and corner ſtone Chriſt Jeſus, ſhould piouſly abandon the ſpacious & ſpecious ſuper-edifica­tions which the Church of Rome had built therupon, ſhould from this variety of Names in the Bible it ſelfe, be provided of an argu­ment, That an unity and conſo­nance in things not eſſentiall, is not106 ſo neceſſarily requiſite as is imagi­ned. Certainly, when the Gen­tils were aſſum'd into the Church, they entred into the ſame funda­mentall faith and religion with the Jews, as Muſculus truly notes; and this conjunction in the roote and foundation, fulfill'd that which was ſaid, Fiet unum Ovi­le,Joh. 10.16 & unus Paſtor, One fold, and one ſhepherd. For, by that be­fore, you may ſee that all Chriſts ſheep are not alwayes in one fold, Other ſheep have I alſo, which are not of this fold. So, all his ſheep are of one fold, that is, under one Shepherd, Chriſt; yet not of one fold, that is, not in one place, nor form. For, that which was ſtray­ed and alone, was his ſheep; much more any flock which hearken together to his voice, his Word, and feed together upon his Sa­craments. Therefore that Church from which we are by Gods Mer­cy eſcaped, becauſe upon the foun­dation, which we yet embrace to­gether, Redemption in Chriſt, they had built ſo many ſtories107 high, as the foundation was, though not deſtroyed, yet hid and obſcured; And their Additions were of ſo dangerous a conſtru­ction, and appearance, and miſ­applyableneſs, that to tender con­ſciences they ſeem'd Idolatrous, and are certainly ſcandalous and very ſlippery, and declinable into Idolatry, though the Church be not in circumſtantiall and dedu­ced points, at unity with us, nor it ſelf; (for, with what tragick rage do the Sectaries of Thomas and Scotus proſecute their diffe­rences? and how impetuouſly doth Molinas and his Diſciples at this day, impugne the common doctrine of grace and freewill? And though theſe points be not immediately fundamentall points of faith, yet radically they are, and as neer the root as moſt of thoſe things wherein we and they dif­fer;) yet though we branch out Eaſt & Weſt, that Church concurs with us in the root, and ſucks her vegetation from one and the ſame ground, Chriſt Jeſus; who, as it is108 in the Canticle, lies between the breſts of his Church,Cant. 1.12 and gives ſuck on both ſides. And of that Church which is departed from us, diſunited by an opinion of a neceſſity that all ſhould be united in one form, and that theirs is it, ſince they keep their right foot faſt upon the Rock Chriſt, I dare not pronounce that ſhe is not our Siſter; but rather as in the ſame Song of Solomon's,Cant. 8.9. We have a little ſi­ſter, and ſhe hath no breſts: if ſhe be a wall, we will build upon her a ſilver palace. If therefore ſhe be a wall, That is, Becauſe ſhe is a wall; for ſo Lyra expounds thoſe words, as on her part, ſhe ſhall be ſafer from ruine, if ſhe apply her ſelf to receive a ſilver palace of Order, and that Hierar­chy which is moſt convenient and proportionall to that ground and ſtate wherein God hath planted her; and ſhe may not tranſplant her ſelf: So ſhall we beſt conſerve the integrity of our own body, of which ſhe is a member, if we109 laboriouſly build upon her, and not tempeſtuouſly and ruinouſly demoliſh and annull her; but ra­ther cheriſh and foment her vitall and wholſome parts, then either cut, or ſuffer them to rot or moul­der off. As naturall, ſo politick bodies have Cutem, & Cuticulam. The little thin skin which covers al our body, may be broken without pain or danger, and may reunite it ſelfe, becauſe it conſiſts not of the chief and principiant parts. But if in the skin it ſelf, there be any ſolution or diviſion, which is ſel­dome without drawing of blood, no art nor good diſpoſition of Nature, can ever bring the parts together again, and reſtore the ſame ſubſtance, though it ſeem to the ey to have ſodder'd it ſelf. It will ever ſeem ſo much as a defor­ming Scar, but is in truth a breach. Outward Worſhip is this Cuticu­la: and integrity of faith the skin it ſelf. And if the firſt be tou­ched with any thing too corroſive, it will quickly pierce the other; and ſo Schiſm, which is a departure110 from obedience, will quickly be­come Hereſie, which is a wilfull deflexion from the way of faith? Which is not yet, ſo long as the main skin is inviolate: for ſo long that Church which deſpiſes ano­ther Church, is it ſelf no other then that of which the Pſalm ſpeakes, Eccleſia Malignanti­um. Thus much was to my un­derſtanding naturally occaſioned and preſented by this variety of Names in the Scriptures: For, if Eſau, Edom, and Seir were but one man; Jethro and Revel, &c. but one man, which have no con­ſonance with one another, and might thereby diſcredit and ener­vate any Hiſtory but this, which is the fountain of truth; ſo Syna­gogue and Church is the ſame thing, and of the Church, Ro­man and Reformed, and all other diſtinctions of place, Diſcipline, or Perſon, but one Church, jour­nying to one Hieruſalem, and di­rected by one guide, Chriſt Jeſus; In which, though this Unity of things not fundamentall, be not111 abſolutely neceſſary, yet it were ſo comely and proportionall with the foundation it ſelf, if it were at Unity in theſe things alſo, that though in my poor opinion, the form of Gods worſhip, eſtabli­ſhed in the Church of England be more convenient, and advantage­ous then of any other Kingdome, both to provoke and kindle devo­tion, and alſo to fix it, that it ſtray not into infinite expanſions and Subdiviſions; (into the former of which, Churches utterly deſpoyl'd of Ceremonies, ſeem to me to have fallen; and the Roman Church, by preſenting innumerable objects, into the later.) And though to all my thankſgivings to God, I ever humbly acknowledg, as one of his greateſt Mercies to me, that he gave me my Paſture in this Park, and my milk from the breſts of this Church, yet out of a fervent, and (I hope) not inordinate af­fection, even to ſuch an Unity, I do zealouſly wiſh, that the whole catholick Church, were reduced to ſuch Unity and agreement, in112 the form and profeſſion Eſtabli­ſhed, in any one of theſe Churches (though ours were principally to be wiſhed) which have not by a­ny additions deſtroyed the foun­dation and poſſibility of ſalvation in Chriſt Jeſus; That then the Church, diſcharged of diſputati­ons, and miſapprehenſions, and this defenſive warr, might con­template Chriſt clearly and uni­formely. For now he appears to her, as in Cant. 2.9. He ſtan­deth behind a wall, looking forth of the window, ſhewing himſelf through the grate. But then, when all had one appetite, and one food, one noſtrill and one purfume, the Church had obtai­ned that which ſhe then asked, Ariſe ô North,Cant. 4.10. and come ô South, and blow on my garden, that the ſpices thereof may flow out. For then, that ſavour of life unto life might allure and draw thoſe to us, whom our diſſentions, more then their own ſtubborneſs with-hold from us.

113

Of Number.

As God Regiſters the Names of his Elect, and of his Inſtru­ments, ſo doth he the Number, He counteth the Number of the ſtarrs, and calleth them by their Names, ſays the Pſalmiſt;Pſ. 147.4. which many Expoſitors interpret of the Elect. Of which Saint John ex­preſſes a very great Number,Rev. 7.6. when he ſays, I heard the number of them which were ſealed 144000. But af­ter in the ninth verſe, A Mul­titude in white before the Lamb, which none could Number. In that place of Geneſis,Gē. 14.14 Pererius. when Abram took 318. to reſcue Lot (which Number hath been, not unuſe­fully obſerved to accord with the Number of the Fathers in the firſt Necene Councell, where Chriſti­anity was reſcued from Arius) the Septuagint have Numeravit, and Saint Ambroſe ſays, the Hebrew word ſignifies Elegit; as though it were ſo connaturall in God, to number and to Elect, that one114 word might expreſs both. And be­cauſe Chriſt knew how rigorous an account God took of thoſe whom he had made Governors of his,Joh. 17.12. in his prayer, that they might be after preſerved, he ſays, I have kept them, and none of them are loſt, except, &c. How often doth God iterate this way alſo of ex­preſſing his love to Abraham, that he will multiply his poſterity? If a man can number the duſt of the earth, then ſhall thy ſeed be numbred, Gen. 13.16. And leſt he ſhould have ſeemed to have per­formed that promiſe when he had onely multiplyed their Number, and yet left them to be trod un­der foot by the Egyptians, becauſe that compariſon of Duſt might import and inſinuate ſo much; he chuſes after another of infinite Number and Dignity together; Tell the Starrs, if thou be able to number them: So ſhall thy ſeed be, Gen. 15.5. David, to let them ſee what a bleſſing their encreaſe in number was, bids them remem­ber what they were,Pſ. 105.12. Cum eſſent815 Numero brevi. And Jeremy, as though they did not elſe concurr with God in his purpoſe to reſtore them to greatneſſe, when they were in Babylon, ſayes to them,Jer. 26.6. Nolite eſſe pauci Numero. Upon this love of God to ſee his people proſper, ſayes Rabbi Solomon, Ʋt homo habens peculium: or, As a man which hath a Stock of cat­tell which he loves, reckons them every day; ſo doth God his peo­ple. Hence is it, that ſo many times God commands his people to be numbred. Inſomuch, that that which we call the Fourth book of Moſes,Prologo. in which Saint Je­rom ſaith are contained totius A­rithmeticae Myſteria, hath the de­nomination from Numbering. In the firſt entrance whereof, God commands his to be numbrd, and to be numbred by Name: And the number in that place, when the old and young,Fr. George Prob. 376. and women are added to it, one very curious, following thoſe rules by which the Hebrews have learned the number of the Angels in heaven,116 hath found to accord preciſely with that number of Angels inti­mated in Dan. 7. This Order, of being firſt Named, and then Num­bred; or firſt Numbred, and then Named, Antichriſt perverts by Anticipation, and doing both at once; for his Name is a Number. The Divel, who counterfeits God, put a deſire into David to num­ber his people; who was then only in his right Arithmetick, when he prayed to finde the number of his dayes. Pſal. 39.5. 1 Chr. 21.1.But when Satan ſtood up againſt Iſrael, and provoked David to number his people, he entred a work of ſuch glory and oſten­tation, that Joab was nine months and twenty dayes in doing that ſervice. 2 Sam. 24.8.But God would number alſo; and becauſe David would not attend his leiſure, he chan­ged his faſhion, and brought upon them that number, which he after threatens again in Iſaiah,Iſa. 65.11. Nume­rabo vos in gladio.

Of this Number. For the Number regiſtred in this Hiſtory, As God had well provided for their Honour, by117 entring their Names in this ever­laſting record: ſo (I think) he provided for his own Honour, of which he is ever jealous, in expreſ­ſing the Number; that all poſte­rity might be awakened to a reve­rent acknowledgment of his great­neſs and goodneſs, by ſeeing, from what a ſmal Number, in how ſhort a time, how numerous a people, through how great preſſures, and ſtraits, were by him propa­gated and eſtabliſhed. For, ſince he is content to receive his Ho­nour from us, (for although all cauſe of Honour be eternally inhe­rent in himſelfe, yet that Act pro­ceeds from us, and of that Ho­nour, which is in Honorante, he could have none, til he had made Creatures to exhibit it;) his great work of Creation, which admits no arreſt for our Reaſon, nor gradations for our diſcourſe, but muſt be at once ſwallowed and devour'd by faith, without ma­ſtication, or digeſtion, is not ſo apt to work upon us, for the pro­voking of our Acts of Honour,118 as thoſe other miracles are, which are ſomewhat more ſubmitted to reaſon, and exerciſe and enter­tain our diſputation, and ſpiritual curioſity by the way, and yet at laſt go as far beyond reaſon, as the other; as all miracles do equally. Of that kind this is; becauſe a mighty People is mira­culouſly made, not of Nothing, (upon which, Conſideration can take no hold) but of a diſpro­portionall, and incompetent lit­tleneſſe. And in theſe, where the ſmallneſſe of the roote, or ſeed, is a degree of the miracle, the Spirit of God uſes to be pre­ciſe in recording it. And there­fore, in the greateſt of that kind, which is the fulfilling and reple­niſhing the world, after that great exinanition by the generall deluge, though Moſes ſay twice or thrice, that Noah, and his ſonnes, and his and their wives went into the Ark, and came out; yet, becauſe the Miracle of pro­pagating conſiſts in the Number, Almighty God is pleaſed, by his119 ordinary way of expounding his word, (which is, to explicate and aſſure one place by another) to teach us, that this Number was but eight: for St. Peter ſays, In the Ark but few, that is,1 Pet. 3. but Eight were ſaved. In like man­ner, I mean with like preciſeneſſe, after the Miracle in Mat. 14. was preciſely recorded, how many loafes, how many fiſhes, how ma­ny Eaters, how many baskets of fragments; In the next chapter, another Miracle of the ſame kind, being to be regiſtred, though it be leſſe then the other, (for their is more meat, fewer eaters, and fewer fragments) yet God ſeems carefull in the particular Numbers. This therefore I take to be ſome reaſon of inſerting this Number; which being ſomewhat diſcordantly, and differently ſet down, as the collation of places manifeſts, and the Spirit of God doing nothing falſly, inordinatly, negligently, dangerouſly, or per­plexedly, to an humble and deli­gent underſtanding; we will in120 the next Section conſider the Va­riety in this Number.

Variety in the Number.

Numbring is ſo proper and pecu­liar to man, who only can number, that ſome philoſophical Inquiſi­tors have argued doubtfully, whe­ther if man were not, there were any Number. And error in Num­bring is De ſubſtantialibus, as lawyers ſay, and ſomtimes annuls, ever vitiates any Inſtrument, ſo much, as it may not be cor­rected. Nothing therefore ſeems ſo much to indanger the Scrip­tures, and to ſubmit and render them obnoxious to cenſure and calumniation, as the apparance of Error in Chronology, or other limbs and members of Arithme­tick: for,Auguſt. in Enchirid. ſince Error is an ap­probation of falſe for true, or in­certain for certain, the Author hath erred (and then the Author is not God) if any Num­ber be falſly delivered; And we erre, if we arreſt our ſelves as up­on121 certain truth (as we do upon all the Scriptures,) when there is ſufficient ſuſpicion of Error, (ab­ſtracting the reverence of the Au­thor,) and a certain confeſſion and undeniableneſs of uncertain­ty. And as a man delated jurid­dically, or by fame, or by pri­vate information of any Crime, muſt, when Canonicall purgation is required at his hands, not on­ly ſweare his own innocency him­ſelf, but produce others of his neighbourhood and friendſhip, to ſwear that they think he ſwears true; and if they concurr'd not with him, this would have the nature of a half-proof, and juſtifie a further proceeding to his con­demnation: ſo when any pro­fane Hiſtorie riſes up againſt any place of Scripture, accuſing it to Humane Reaſon, and underſtan­ding, (for though in our ſupreme Court in ſuch caſes, for the laſt Appeal be Faith, yet Reaſon is her Delegate) it is not enough that one place juſtify it ſelf to ſay true, but all other places produced as122 handling the ſame matter, muſt be of the ſame opinion, and of one harmony. I have therefore wondred that Althemerus, pre­tending to reconcile all apparant diſcordances in the Scriptures, hath utterly pretermitted all vari­ety in Numbring: Of Examples whereof, the comparing of the Hiſtoricall books, would have af­forded him great plenty, and wor­thy of his travell. The generall reaſons why God admits ſome ſuch diverſities in his book, pre­vail alſo for this place which is now under our conſideration; which are, firſt, To make men ſharpe and induſtrious in the in­quiſition of truth, he withdrawes it from preſent apprehenſion, and obviouſneſs. For naturally great wits affect the reading of obſcure books, wraſtle and ſweat in the explication of propheſies, digg and threſh out the words of unle­gible hands, reſuſcitate and bring to life again the mangled, and lame fragmentary images and characters in Marbles and Medals,123 becauſe they have a joy and com­placency in the victory and at­chievement thereof. Another reaſon is, That as his elect chil­dren are ſubmitted by him to the malice and calumny of the Repro­bate, and are not only ragefully tempeſted with ſtormes of perſe­cution, but contemptuouſly and ſcornfully (which is oftentimes the greater affliction) inſimulated of folly and ſillineſs, are in his knowledg, and often ſo declared in this world to abound in the treaſure of riches and wiſdome: So he is pleaſed that his word ſhould endure and undergo the opinion of contradiction, or o­ther infirmiries, in the eyes of Pride (the Author of Hereſie and Schiſm) that after all ſuch diſſecti­ons, &ribrations, and examinings of Heteticall adventures upon it, it might return from the furnace more refin'd, and gain luſter and clearneſs by this vexation. But the moſt important and uſefull reaſon is, that we might ever have occaſion to accuſtome our ſelves,124 to that beſt way of expounding Scriptures, by comparing one place with another. All the doubts about this place determine in two. Firſt, why the Number is in ſo many places ſaid to be Se­venty, as Gen. 46.27. and in this place of Exodus, and in Deut. 10.22. And yet Gen. 46.26. the Number is ſaid to be but 66. And in all the proceſs of time from Moſes's to Stephen's martyrdome, recorded Act. 7. there could be no other doubt but this one, to them which underſtood Hebrew, and were not miſgoverned by the tranſlation of the Septuagint. And this firſt doubt is no ſooner offe­red, then anſwered; for in the 46. of Gen. the 26 verſe ſpeaks of 66, and conſiders not Joſeph and his two ſons, which were al­ready in Egypt, in which the 27. verſe doth, and adding Jacob him­ſelf, perfects the Number 70. of which it ſpeaks. So that here is no diſſonance in the Number, but only the Spirit of God hath uſed his liberty, in the phraſe, recko­ning125 ſome born in Egypt among the ſoules which came into Egypt. The other Doubt, which hath more travelled the Expoſitors, is, why Stephen, referring to Moſes,Act. 7. ſhould ſay, they were 75. The occaſion of this miſtaking (for ſo I think it was) was given by falſe Copies of the Septuagint's tranſla­tion, then in moſt uſe. For the Hebrew text was long before ſo farr out of ordinary uſe, that we ſee our Saviour himſelf, in his al­legations, follows the Septuagint. And in my mind, ſo much reve­rence is due to that tranſlation, that it were hard to think, that they at firſt added five to Moſes Num­ber. For, that which is ſaid for that opinion (though by Saint Hie­rome) which is, that they com­prehend ſome nephews of Joſeph, hath no warrant; and all the reſt of the brethren were likely to have nephews at that time alſo. And againſt this opinion it prevails much with me, that, by Saint Hie­romes teſtimony, that tranſlati­on in his time, in the other place,126 Deut. 10.22. had but 70, conform to Moſes: And any reaſon which might have induced them to add 5 in Geneſis, had been as ſtrong for Deuteronomy. Junius, ſcarce exceeded by any,L. 1. Par. 92. in learning, ſharpneſs, and faith, thinks that Stephen neither applyed his ſpeech to that account of thoſe that were iſſued from Jacob's loyns, which were indeed but 66, nor to the addition of the three in Egypt, which, with Jacob himſelf accom­pliſh'd the number of 70; but that, inſiſting preciſely upon Mo­ſes ſyllables, he related ſo many as were expreſſed by name by Mo­ſes in that Chapter, to have been of Jacob's Family; which were Jacob's four wives, and the two ſons of Judah, which make up 75. But with that modeſty wherein he asks leave to depart from the Fathers, I muſt depart from him: for Joſeph could not cauſe theſe two ſons of Judah to be brought into Egypt, (as appears in the Text he did, for all the number there intended,) ſince127 they were dead in Canaan before, as is evident, Geneſ. 46. Others therefore have thought, that Saint Luke reported not the words out of Stephen's mouth, but by view of Moſes his text, and that but in the Tranſlation; becauſe being but a Proſelite, he had no perfe­ction, nor was accuſtom'd to the Hebrew. And others, that indulgently he deſcended to that text which was moſt familiar, and ſo moſt credible to them. For, though this be either an apparant Error in the Septuagint at firſt, (which is hard to allow, if we be­leeve half of that which uſes to be ſaid, in proof; that the Holy Ghoſt aſſiſted them) Or a cor­ruption inſinuated after, (as it is eaſie, when Numbers are expreſ­ſed by numerant letters,) yet that tranſlation, ſo corrupted, had ſo much weight, that all then fol­lowed it; and it maintained that authority ſo long, that even in Lyra's time the Latin obeyed it. For he reads in this place of Exo­dus, 75. though he there confeſs128 the Hebrew hath but 70. This in my underſtanding may ſafelyer be admitted, then to decline ſo farr as Maſter Calvin doth, who thinks it poſſible that Saint Luke repos'd the true Number 70; but ſome other exſcriber, ignorant of Hebrew, and obedient to the Sep­tuagint, reformed it deformly ſince his writing; for this ſeems to me to open dangerouſly a way to the infringing, or infirming ma­ny places of Scripture. The Number being then certainly 70, ſince by the hardneſs and inſo­lence of the Phraſe, there ſeems ſome violence and force, to raiſe the Number to 75. (for it may ſeem hard, that Joſeph, which ſent for theſe 70, ſhould be called one of the 70 which came; And that his two Sons already in E­gypt, ſhould be two of them which came into Egypt; And that Jacob ſhould be one of theſe 70 which iſſued out of Jacobs loins;) in a few words we will conſider,Of the Number 70. whe­ther any Myſtery reſide in that choſen Number; the rather be­cauſe129 very many remarkable things, and paſſages in Hi­ſtory, ſeeme to me to have been limited in that Number, which therefore ſeems more Periodick then any other.

But becauſe any over curious and Myſterious conſideration of this Number 70. though it be compoſed of the two greateſt Numbers (for Ten cannot be ex­ceeded, but that to expreſs any further Number you muſt take a part of it again; and Seven is ever uſed to expreſs infinite,) be too Cabaliſtick and Pythagorick for a vulgar Chriſtian, (which I offer not for a phraſe of Diminu­tion or Diſtruſt, that ſuch are un­provided of ſufficient defences for themſelves, or are ignorant of a­ny thing required in ſuch as they, for ſalvation; But that there is needed alſo a Meta-theology, and ſuper-divinity, above that which ſerves our particular conſciences, in them, who muſt fight againſt Philoſophers and Jews) becauſe I am one, and in a low degree, of130 the firſt and vulgar rank, and write but to my equals, I will forbear it, as miſ-interpretable; ſince to ſome-palates it may taſte of Oſtentation; but to ſome, of diſtraction from better contem­plations, and of ſuperſtition to others: yet, we may, as well with reverence to the things, as reſpect to the Number, reſt a little upon thoſe works of God, or his Servants, which this Number, at leaſt, reduces to our memory.

Firſt therefore, Thoſe Fathers of the world,70. Patri­archs. to whom God affords a room by name in the 10th. of Gen. from whom are de­rived all Nations, all extinguiſh'd and forgotten, all now eminent and in actions, and all yet un­diſcovered, and unbeing; They to whoſe Sons he hath given the earth, utterly waſted before, and hath reſerved rooms in Heaven, from whence their betters are de­jected, are reckoned there to be 70. After, when the children of Iſrael's murmuring kindled Mo­ſes zeal to expoſtulate with God,70. Elders. 131 thus, Have I conceived all this people, or have I begotten them, that I ſhould bear this? I am not able to bear all this alone; therefore, if thou deal thus with me, if I have found favour in thy ſight, I pray thee kill me, that I behold not my miſery. When by this im­portunity Moſes had extorted from God another form of po­licy, the Number amongſt which God would divide Moſes's la­bour, and Moſes's ſpirit, was 70. The barbarous cruelty of Adoni­bezek,70. Kings ſlain. Judg. 6.1. confeſs'd by himſelf, was then accompliſh'd, and ripe for God's vengeance, when he had executed it upon 70. Kings. Mo­ſes,70. years our life. though his words, Gen. 6. Mans dayes ſhall be 120. years, are by many, and may well be expounded to be the ordinary term of mans life after the floud, (though ordinarily they are ſaid to deſigne the years from that ſpeech to the floud.) And though at that time when he writ the 89th. Pſalm, (for he writ the Penta­teuch firſt, and that after his going132 out of Egypt) he was more then 80 years old) yet in that Pſalm, he pitches the limits of mans life 70 years. In 70. Da­vid died. Though David were not Author of that Pſalm, he was an Example of it; for, though in a Kingdom which had but newly taken that form, and was now tranſlated to David's Family, and vexed with the diſcontentments of Saul's friends, and his own ſon's ambitions, a longer life, and lon­ger raign might ſeem to many to have been requiſite, yet he ended his years in 70. David was thirty when he began to raign,2 Sam. 5.4 and he raigned forty;70000. of the plague. After he had ſeen the anger of God, puniſhing his confidence in the number of his men,2 Sam. 24.31. by diminiſhing them, limit and determine it ſelf in 70 thou­ſand. And in that great Captivity of Babylon,70. years in Baby­lon. in which (as many think) the word of God himſelf, the Text of Scriptures periſhed, that great and pregnant Mother, and Daughter of Myſteries, (for how many Propheſies were ful­fill'd and accompliſh'd in that,133 and how many conceived but then, which are not yet brought to light?) the choſen people of God, were trodden down 70. years. To which forraign ſojourning, for many concurrences, and main circumſtances, many have aſſi­milated and compared the Ro­man Churches ſtraying into France,70. in A­vignon. and being empounded in Avignon 70. years; And ſo long alſo laſted the Inundation of the Goths in Italy. 70. the Goths in Italy. In that dejecti­on and bondage in Babylon, God afforded to Daniel that viſion and voice,70. Heb­domad. then which nothing is more myſterious, nothing more important for our aſſurance, no­thing more advantageable againſt the Jews, which is the ſeventy Hebdomades. Then,70. Diſci­ples. thoſe Diſci­ples, ſupplyers and fellow-wor­kers with the Apoſtles, equall to them in very many things (and, men diſpute, whether not in all) whom our moſt Bleſſed Saviour inſtituted,Luk. 10.1. were alſo of this Num­ber, 70. And ſo having refreſh'd to your memory, upon this occa­ſion134 of the Number 70. theſe ſtories out of the Bible, we will end with this obſervation, that when God moved Ptolomeus to a deſire of having the Bible tran­ſlated,Septuagint. he accited from Jeruſa­lem 72, for that glorious and myſtick work; And theſe, though they were 72, either for affecti­on to conform themſelves to a number ſo notorious, or for ſome true myſterie in it, or for what elſe, God knowes; have ever re­tained the name of Septuagint.

And ſo having delivered what by Gods grace I received, of this book in generall, and of the rea­ſon of regiſtring the names, and why there is therein ſome variety. Why alſo they are ſumm'd and numbred up; and why variouſly; And laſtly, noted thoſe ſpeciall places, which the Number 70. preſented; I will now paſſe to that which I deſtin'd for a ſecond Part, becauſe it is radically and contractedly in that firſt verſe, but diffuſed and expanſively through the whole book; The135 Mercy, Power, Juſtice, and Judgement of God: of which, if nothing can be ſaid new, nothing can be ſaid too of­ten.

PART. 2.

THough God be abſolutely ſimple,Compoſi­tion in Gods acti­ons. yet ſince for our ſaks in his Scriptures he often ſubmits himſelf to compariſons and ſimi­litudes, we may (offenceleſly (ſince there is nothing but him­ſelf, ſo large as the world) thus compare him to the world: That his eternall Preſcience is the Coeleſtiall world, which admits no alteration, no generation of new purpoſes, nor corruption of old; and thoſe four, Mercy, Pow­er, Juſtice, Judgment, are the Elementary world, of which all below is compoſed, and the Ele­mented world are his particular extrinſick actions: In which, though they be ſo complexioned,136 that all are mingled equally, yet in every one of them, every one of theſe four concur. For, in every work of God there is mercy and juſtice,Aq. qu. 21. ar. 4. ſo, as they preſup­poſe one another. And as in his created Elements, ſo in theſe there is a condenſing and a rarifying, by which they become and grow into one another. For often that action which was principally intended for a work of Juſtice a­gainſt one Malefactor, extends it ſelf to an univerſall Mercy, by the Example. And the children of God know how to reſolve and make liquid all his Actions. They can ſpie out and extract Balmes, and Oyles from his Vinegers; and ſupple, and cure with his cor­roſives. Be he what he will, they will make him Mercifull, if Mercy be then wholſomeſt for them. For ſo that brave Maca­bee interpreted Gods daily affli­cting them; The Lord doth not long wait for us, as for other nati­ons, whom he puniſheth when they come to the fulneſs of their ſins;137 but he never withdraweth his Mer­cy from us. And in like manner out of his Mercies they can di­ſtil Juſtice, when preſumption up­on Mercy needs ſuch a corrective. For ſo ſays Saint Ambroſe,De Paradi­ſo. De poenit. diſt. 1. Ser­pens. Cain indignus judicatus eſt, qui puni­retur in peccato; becauſe he was not ſo much ſpared, as reſerved to a greater condemnation. And upon like reaſon, the Emperiall laws forbid a ſervant in an Inne to be accuſed of incontinency, be­cauſe (in thoſe times) cuſtome had made them all ſuch, and therefore unworthy of the laws cogniſance. Yet of all theſe four Elements Mercy is the up­permoſt and moſt Embracing. Of Mercy.Miſerationes ejus ſuper omnia o­pera ejus. And,Pſal. 144. Quanta Magni­tudo, as great as his greatneſs (which is infinite) is his Mercy. And as great as his power,Eccl. 2.17. which is omnipotent: for it is therefore ſaid, Miſereris omnium,Sap. 11. quia om­nia potes. Before there was any ſubject of his mercy, he was mer­cifull; for Creation it ſelf is one138 of the greateſt of his Mercies. And it is Miſericordia Domini,Thre. 9. quia non ſumus conſumpti; ſo that our preſervation is alſo from mercy. And therefore will the Lord wait that he may have mercy upon you;Iſa. 30.18. and, miſerans miſerabitur, in the next verſe. God is the Lord of Hoſtes, and this world a war­fare. And as the Emperiall Armies had three Signa Milita­ria to be given them,Veget. l. 3. cap. 5. ſo hath Gods mercy afforded us. They had Signa Vocalia, the expreſs word of the Commander, which office the word of God doth to us; And Semivocalia, which were the ſound of trumpets & other inſtruments, and ſuch to us are traditions and Sermons, partaking of God and man: And they had Signa muta, which were the Colours and En­ſignes, and ſuch to us are the Crea­tures and works of God. His Mercy is infinite in Extent: for it is in all places; yea, where there is no place: And it is infinite in Du­ration; For as it never begun, (for the Ideating of this world,139 which was from everlaſting, was a work of mercy) and as the in­terruptions which by acts of Ju­ſtice it ſeemes to ſuffer here, diſ­continue it not, (for though God ſay, For a moment in mine anger I hid my face from thee;Iſa. 54.8. yet he adds there, yet with everlaſting Mercy have I had compaſſion on thee;) ſo alſo is it reaſonable to think, that it ſhall never have end. And becauſe in heaven there can be no diſtinct and particular act of Mercy from God, becauſe there ſhall be no demerit in us, nor poſſibility of it, after judg­ment; Therefore, and from the Pſalm, Non continebit in ira ſua miſericordias ſuas, ſome (but too licenciouſly) have concluded a determination and ending of the pains of the damned; and others learned and pious, and accuſed by no body for this opinion, evict from hence, certain intervalla, and relaxations in the torments of Hell,Lomb. l. 4. Diſt. 46. ex Auguſt. after the generall Judg­ment, as all confeſſe a diminiſhing of the pains there, and that the140 puniſhment is citra condignum, by the benefit of the paſſion of our Bleſſed Saviour. That which is Mercy in God, in us is Compaſſi­on. And in us, it hath two ſteps. To reſt upon the firſt, which is but a ſadneſſe, and ſorrow for anothers miſery, is but a dull, lazy, and barren compaſſion. There­fore it is elegantly expreſſed in the Pſalm,Pſal. 111. Jucundus homo, qui miſeretur, & commodat; for that is the ſecond and higheſt ſtep in Compaſſion, Alacrity, and Chear­fulneſſe to help. And as God, delighting moſt in mercy, hath propoſed to himſelfe moſt wayes for the exerciſe thereof, ſo hath he provided man of moſt occaſi­ons of that vertue. Every man contributes to it, by being Agent, or Patient. Certainly, we were all miſerable, if none were; for we wanted the excerciſe of the profitableſt vertue. For though a Judg may be juſt, though none tranſgreſſe; and we might be mer­cifull, though none wanted, by keeping ever a diſpoſion to be ſuch,141 if need were; yet what can we hope would ſerve to awake us then, which ſnort now under the cries of the wretched, the teſtimo­ny of our own conſciences, the li­berall promiſes of reward from God, and his loud threatnings for ſuch omiſſions? Amongſt the Rules of State, it is taught and practis'd for one, That they which advance and do good, muſt do it immediately from them­ſelves, that all the Obligation may be towards them: But when they will deſtroy or do hurt, they muſt do it inſtrumentally by o­thers, to remove and alienate the envy. Accordingly, when Princes communicate to any Jura Regalia, by that they are authorized to ap­prehend, accuſe, purſue, condemne, execute, and diſpoil, but not to par­don. God doth otherwiſe; for, for our firſt ſin, himſelfe hath in­flicted death, and labour upon us. And, as it were to take from us all occaſion of evill, he doth all the evill of which his nature is capable, which is but Malum142 poenae. But of the treaſures of his mercy, he hath made us the Stew­ards, by diſpenſing to one ano­ther. For firſt, he hath redeemed man by man, and then he hath made Hominem homini Deum. And proportionall to this trea­ſure, he hath made our neceſ­ſities and miſeries infinite. So much, that an Egyptian King forbad Hegeſias the Philoſopher to ſpeak publickly of humane mi­ſery,Val. Max. l. 8. c. 9. leaſt every one ſhould kill himſelf. All conſiſts of givers and receivers: and to contract it cloſer, every man is both thoſe; and therefore made ſo, becauſe one provokes the other: for, Homo indigus,Prov. 19. miſericors eſt. And it is therefore that Aquinas ſayes,2a. 2ae. q. 30. ar. 2. that old men, and wiſe men, are apteſt to this vertue, becauſe they beſt fore-ſee a poſſibility of nee­ding others compaſſion. And if thou hadſt nothing to give, or kneweſt no want in any other, thou haſt work enough within doors; Miſerere animae tuae. But towards our ſelves,Eccleſ. 30. or perſons al­moſt143 our ſelves, there is not pro­perly mercy, but grief;Aqu. ibid. therfore we muſt go to ſeek gueſts. And to ſuch a chearfull giver, God gives himſelf;Paulinus: Homil. de Gazophi­lactio. l. 4. c. 5. Et quid non poſſidet, qui ipſum poſſi•••poſſi­dentem? ſayes a contemplative wiſe man. And for ſuch a giver to work upon. God makes others needy; Fecit mileros, at ag­noſceret miſericordes, ſayes the ſame man, in the ſame book. In the firſt conſtitution of the Ro­man Empire, by the generall cor­ruption of all men, which is to give more to them which abound, they eaſily fore-ſaw, that men would ſoon decline and ſtray in­to a chargeable and ſumptuous worſhip of their Gods; And therefore they reſiſted it with this law, Deos frugi colunto. This mo­derated their ſacrifices, but yet withheld them not from the ſu­perfluous adorning the Temples and Images of their Gods. But in our reformed Chriſtian Religi­on, which is the thriftieſt and cheapeſt that ever was inſtituted,144 (for our Sacrifices grow within us, and are our owne creatures, prayer and praiſe; and ſince our Beſſed Saviour hath given himſelf for us, we are now as men which had paid a great fine, and were bound to no other rent, then acknowledgements and ſervices) now that we have removed the expenſive digniſing of images, and relicks, what other exerciſe is there left for our charity, then thoſe nearer images both of God, and of our ſelves, the poore? Be mer­cifull then, as your Father in hea­ven is mercifull. And how is he? homines & jument a ſalvabis, Deus, Pſal. 35. and by jumenta are un­derſtood men not yet reduced to the knowledg of God. Give then thy counſel to the ignorant, thy prayers to the negligent, but moſt thy ſtrength to the oppreſſed and dejected in heart; for ſurely, oppreſſion maketh a wiſe man mad, Eccl. 7.9. how tempeſtuouſly will it then work upon a weaker? let no greatneſs retard thee from giving, as though thou wert a­bove145 want. Alas, our greatneſs is Hydroptick, not ſolid: we are not firm, but puffed, and ſwoln; we are the lighter, and the leſſer for ſuch greatneſs. Alcibiades bragg'd how he could walk in his own ground; all this was his,Aelian. l. 3. c. 28. and no man a foot within him; and Socrates gave him a little map of the world, and bid him ſhow him his territory there; and there an Ant would have overſtrid it. Let no ſmalneſſe retard thee: if thou beeſt not a Cedar to help towards a palace, if thou beeſt not Amber, Bezoar, nor liquid gold, to re­ſtore Princes; yet thou art a ſhrub to ſhelter a lambe, or to feed a bird; or thou art a plan­tane, to eaſe a childs ſmart; or a graſſe to cure a ſick dog. Love an asker better then a giver: which was good Agapetus counſel to Ju­ſtinian: Yea rather, prevent the asking; and do not ſo much joyn and concur with miſery, as to ſuf­fer it to grow to that ſtrength, that it ſhall make thy brother ask, and put him to the danger of a146 denyall. Avoid in giving, that which the Canoniſts expreſſe by Cyminibilis, which is a trifling giver. And give not (as Seneca cals them) panes lapidoſos; which are benefits hardly drawn, which have onely the ſhape, not the nouriſhment of benefits: But give as thou wouldſt receive. For thou giveſt not, but reſtoreſt, yea thou performeſt another du­ty too, thou lendeſt. Thou doſt not waſte, but lay up; and thou gaineſt in loſing. For to this gi­ving moſt properly ſquares Plato's definition of liberality, that it is, ſtudium lucrandi ut decet. I need not much fear that any man is too much inflamed to a waſtfull charity by this; yet it is an affection capable of ſin. And therefore, as waggoners in ſteep deſcents, tie the teame behind, not to draw it up, but to ſtop ſodaine precipitations downward, ſo, onely to prevent ſuch ſlipery downfals, I ſay, That as the Ho­ly Ghoſt forbids, Eccl. 7.18. Be not juſt orvermuch, ſo one may147 be charitable overmuch. His apt­nes to give, may occaſion anothers ſloth, and he may breed the worms which ſhall eat him; and pro­duce the lean kine, which ſhall devoure the fat. And ſo, as Paulinus ſays,Ad Seve­rum. In charitatem de charitate peccat. And in another place,De Mona­chata. Multa charitas pene deli­rum, & pietas ſtultum fecit. For, God would not, ſaith Saint Am­broſe, that we ſhould pour out,De Officiis. but diſtribute our wealth. So that for preciſe Moderation herein precept will not ſerve; but that prayer of that moſt devout Ab­bot Antony, (of whom Saint Auguſtine ſays,De Doctri­na Chriſti­ana. that without knowledge of letters, he rehear­ſed, and expounded all the Scrip­tures) Deus det nobis gratiam Diſcretionis. For, the ſame B. Dorothaeus which ſays wiſely, God requires not that you ſhould fly, but that you ſhould not fall,Doctrin. 14 ſayes alſo devoutly,Doctrin. 1. That they which do what they are comman­ded of Chriſt, pay their tribut juſt­ly, but they which performe his148 counſels, bring him preſents. But in this we may inſiſt no longer: wee ſhall beſt know what wee ſhould do, by conſidering what God hath done, and how hee expreſs'd his mercies towards his Iſraelites.

His Mer­cy in brin­ging them to Egypt.He brought them into the Land of Egypt. For though in the Scriptures, when God would ex­cite his children, he uſes to re­member them that he is that God which brought them out of the Land of Egypt; yet, that he brought them into that Land, was more ſimply, abſolutely, and intirely a work of Mercy. For, in the o­ther he exerciſed his Juſtice upon Pharaoh; and his Power in Mi­racles. And Miracles muſt not be drawne into conſequence; No man may argue to himſelf, God hath miraculouſly preſerved me, therefore he will do ſo ſtill. Miracles are to our apprehenſion incoherent & independent things with the reſt of Nature. They ſeem none of the links of that149 great chaine of providence, and connexion of cauſes. Therefore he which hears them, beleeves them but ſo far as he beleeves the repor­ter; and he which ſees them, ſuſ­pects his ſenſe in the apprehen­ding, and his judgment in the inquiſition and purſuite of the cauſes; or goes more roundly to work, and imputes it all to the Divell. But this work of bringing them into Egypt, was only a work of a familiar and fatherly Provi­dence: and, though it were grea­ter then the other (for in com­ming from Egypt they were but redeemed from ſerving, here from periſhing) yet there is nothing in the Hiſtory, which a meer natu­rall man would grudg to beleeve. From what kind of Deſtruction did he then deliver them? Famine.From famine; One of thoſe three affli­ctions, which God in a diligent and exquiſite revenge preſented to David's choice. And one of thoſe two, in compariſon whereof, Da­vid choſe a peſtilence of uncertain laſting and intenſeneſs. An affli­ction150 ſo great, as God chooſes that compariſon to expreſs his greateſt affliction of all, which is a famine of his word. Amos.An affli­ction which defeats all Magiſtra­cy; for in it one may lawfully ſteal. All propriety; for in it all things return to their prima­tive community. All naturall af­fection; for in it fathers may ſell their children, by humane laws; and divine books have Examples where they have eaten them. An affliction,Sueton. Ca­lig. 26. which Caligula, to ex­ceed his predeceſſors and his own Examples, ſtudied out, when to i­mitate the greateſt power of all, praecluſis horreis, indixit populo fa­mem. An affliction with which our law revenges her ſelf when a delinquent which had offended her before, doth after in contempt of her ſtand mute at the bar. It is a Rack, without either Engine or Executioner; a devouring poy­ſon, and yet by ſubſtraction; and a way to make a man kill himſelf by doing nothing. Such are all extreme famines, and ſuch was151 this. For it was no particular curſe upon one country; for fa­mine was in all the Land,Gen. 41.54. ver. 57. ſays the text. And all Countryes came to Egypt to buy corn. It was no naturall diſeaſe or infirmity in the earth or aire: but as the Pſalmiſt expreſſes it,Pſ. 105.16 God had called a fa­mine upon the land, and utterly brake the ſtaffe of bread. Egypt her ſelf, which uſes to brag,Paneg. Plin. in I­racund. Ni­hil ſe imbribus coeloque debere, and whoſe inundations are fertilities, felt the barreneſs, though by Jo­ſephs providence it felt not the pe­nury. In this affliction, in this diſtreſs, the ſons of Jacob muſt go into a ſtrange land, where they had no friend whom they knew, but (to ſpeak humanely) an ene­my whom they knew not. And yet God, as though their malice againſt their brother Joſeph, and as though this curſe upon the whole land had been ordained by him for their advantage, (for ſo it may ſeem by thoſe words of Jo­ſeph, You ſent me not hither,Gen. 45.8 but God; and in the Pſalm,Pſal. 105. God ſent152 a man before them) appears to Jacob, perſwades the jour­ney, aſſures him and his ſafe going, great propagation, and ſafe return.

His Mer­cy in pro­pagating them in Egypt.Propagation is the trueſt I­mage and neareſt repreſentation of eternity. For eternity it ſelf, that is, the Deity it ſelf ſeems to have been ever delighted with it: for the producing of the three Perſons in the Trinity,Propagati­on of God. which is a conti­nuing and undeterminable work, is a propagation of the Deity. And next to this contemplation, that God, which is full, and per­fect, and All, ſhould admit a pro­pagation, it may deſerve a ſecond place to conſider, that that which is meerly and utterly Nothing,Of Sin. which is Sin, (for it is but priva­tion) hath had the greateſt pro­pagation that can be. And be­tween theſe two extreme Miracles, A propagation in that which is al­ready All, and a propagation in that which is alwayes. Nothing, we may wonder at a propagation153 in that which is but one halfe; which is, thoſe Religious Orders,Of religi­ous Or­ders. & devout profeſſions, which mul­tiply without Mothers. Of which (not to ſpeak of late times, when that profeſſion was become a diſ­eaſe and contagion, and ſo no wonder though they infected, and poſſeſſed, and devoured whole teritories; but in their primitive inſtitution and practice, how in­finite was the propagation? we cannot diſcredit thoſe ſtories (for being diſ-intereſſed in our late-ſprung Controverſies they could not ſpeak prejudicially) which reckon 5000. in ſome one Mona­ſtery; and 500 Monaſteries un­der one Abbot. Theſe who had no wives, had infinite ſpirituall children; and having nothing in the world, had a great part of it. Within one mile of Alexandria, there were 500 Monaſteries pene contigua. So that, it is truly ſaid of them, they had Oppida ex­tra Mundum. And when the on­ly tribe of the Benedictins was in full height,Azor. l. 12 it had not many leſſe154 then 40000 Monaſteries. And not only the Chriſtian Church, the eaſineſs of whoſe yoke might invite them to theſe counſails, but the Jews under an inſupportable law, would ever ſuper-errogate in this kinde. Of whoſe one ſect, the Eſſeni,L. 5. c. 17. Pliny ſays, per multa ſeculorum millia, gens aeterna, in qua nemo naſcitur; and he gives no other mother to ſuch an in­creaſe then this, Tam foecunda illis aliorum vitae poenitentia. Of theſe men, (if they will accept that name,) (except ſuch of them as being all born to ſail in the ſame ſhip as we, and to ſuffer with us, have ſo ſublimed their wits with a contempt of ours, that they ſteal from us in a Calenture; or ſo ſtupified themſelves, that they forſake their partnerſhip in our labours and dangers, in a lazy Scurvie,) I dare not conceive any hard opinion: For though we be all Gods tenants in this world, and freeholders for life, and are ſo bound amongſt other duties, to keep the world in155 reparation, and leave it as well as we found it, (for, ut gignamus geniti) yet ſince we have here two employments, one to con­ſerve this world, another to increaſe Gods Kingdome, none is to be accuſed, that every one doth not all, ſo all do all. For as, though every parti­cular man by his diet and tempe­rance, ſhould preſerve his own body, and ſo obſerve it by his own experience of it, that he might ordinarily be his own Phyſician; yet it is fit, that ſome ſepoſe all their time for that ſtudy, and be able to inſtruct and reform others; So, though eve­ry one ſhould watch his own ſteps, and ſerve God in his vocation; yet there ſhould be ſome, whoſe Vocation it ſhould be to ſerve God; as all ſhould do it, ſo ſome ſhould do nothing elſe. But, becauſe, our eſſe muſt be con­ſidered before our bene eſſe, and to our eſſe properly conduce all things which belong to our pre­ſervation here, (for, the firſt156 words that ever God ſaid to man, were,Gen. 1.28 Bring forth, and multiply, and fill the earth, which was pro­pagation; And then preſently, ſubdue it, and rule, which is Do­minion. And then, Every thing which hath life, ſhall be to you for meat; which is not only ſuſte­nance, but lawfull abundance and delicacy.) Therefore to advance propagation, lawes have been di­ligent and curious. Some have forbidden a man to divide him­ſelfe to divers women, becauſe, though God in his ſecret ends have ſomtimes permitted it to the Patriarchs, and though (being able to make contraries ſerve to one end) he threatens in another place, that ten women ſhall follow one man; yet ordinarily this li­berality of a mans ſelf, fruſtrates propagation, and is in it ſelfe a confeſſion, that he ſeeks not chil­dren. Maximini­ano, & Conſtanti­no.And therefore the Pane­gyrick juſtly extols that Empe­rour, who married young; No­vum jam, tum miraculum, juve­nis uxorius. And ſome lawes in157 the Greek States enforced men to marry: and the Roman law pretended to have the ſame ends, but with more ſweetneſſe, by gi­ving priviledges to the married: but ever increaſing them with their number of children, of which to have had none, threw a man back again into penalty; for of the eſtate of ſuch, a tenth part was confiſcate; for to have children, is ſo much of the eſ­ſence of the lawfulneſſe of that act, that Saint Auguſtine ſayes, Si prolem ex conditione vitant,De bono Conjugali. non eſt matrimonium; for that is a condition deſtroying the nature of matrimony; of which, and of the fruits thereof, how indul­gent the Romans were, this one law declares; That to Minors they allowed ſo many years more then they had, as they had chil­dren.

Of this propaga­tion.Of this propagation, which is our preſent contemplation, ma­ny think devoutly, that the ſmal­neſſe of the firſt number, and the ſhortneſſe of the time, are the re­markable158 and eſſentiall parts. To advance their devotion, I will re­member them, that the number of 430. years divers times ſpoken of, is from Abraham's coming to Canaan;Exod. 12.41. for the time of this pro­pagation in Egypt, was but 215. years. And the number of men, which is 600000. is only of fight­ing men,Numb. 1. which cannot well be thought a fiſt part of all the ſouls. The whole number Joſephus, pro­portioning 10. to a paſchal lamb, as the Rabbins do, brings to be 3700000. yet to me theſe ſeem no great parts of Gods exceeding Mercy in this Hiſtory; for from ſo many, in ſuch a ſpace, God, without miracle, by affording twins, and preſerving alive, might ordinarily have derived more men then ever were at once upon the whole earth. But whether his decree have appointed a certain number which mankind ſhall not exceed, (as it ſeems to be a reaſo­nable conjecture of the whole, becauſe in the moſt famous parts it is found to have held; Rome, and159 Venice, and like States never ex­ceeding that number to which they have very ſoon arrived:) Or that the whole earth is able to nouriſh no more, without doubt it is evident, that the world had very long ſince as many ſouls as ever it had, or may be preſu­med to have ever hereafter. And it is a very probable conjecture, that the reaſon, why, ſince wolves produce oftner, and more then ſheep, and more ſheep are killed then wolves, yet more ſheep re­main, is, becauſe they are che­riſhed by all induſtry. For only there men increaſe, where there is means for their ſuſtentation. That therefore which God did mercifully in this, was, that he propagated them to ſuch num­bers under ſuch oppreſſions and deſtructions: for the Egyptians cruelly cauſed them to ſerve,Exod. 1. and made them weary of their lives by ſore labour, with all manner of bondage: yea, their devoti­on was ſcornfully miſ-interpreted, Becauſe you are idle, you ſay, let160 us go offer to our Lord. Exod. 12.And yet, the more they vexed them, the more they grew;Pſ. 105.24 and hee made them ſtronger then their oppreſſors; And this, though that deſperate law of deſtroying all their male children, had been executed a­mong them.

His Mercy in bring­ing them from E­gypt.Now follows his bringing them from Egypt: And though that were properly a work of Juſtice, becauſe it was the performance of God's promiſe, yet that pro­miſe was rooted in Mercy: And though hee brought them out In Manu forti, as it is very often re­peated, and by effect of miracles, and ſo ſhow'd his power, (for it is written,Pſa. 106.7 he ſaved them for his Names ſake, that he might make his power to be knowne. And in a­nother place,Exo. 14.4 I will get me honour upon Pharoah, and upon all his hoſt) yet reſpecting the time when he did it, (to which his promiſe had not limited him) and for whom he did it, we can contemplate nothing but Mercy. For in the161 ſame place, it is ſaid, Our Fa­thers underſtood not thy wonders in Egypt, neither remembred the multitude of thy Mercies: ſo that, diverſly beheld, the ſame Act might ſeem all Power, and all Mercy. And at this time we conſi­der, not that thoſe plagues afflicted Egypt, but the land of Goſhen felt none; and we hear not now the cryes and lamentations for the death of the firſt-born, but we re­member, that not a dog opened his mouth againſt the children of Iſra­el. Exod. 11.He delivered them then from ſuch an oppreſſor, as would nei­ther let them go, nor live there. From one who increaſed their la­bours, and diminiſhed their num­bers. From one who would nei­ther allow them to be Naturals, nor Aliens. So ambiguous and perplex'd, and wayward is humane policy, when ſhe exceeds her limits, and her ſubject. But God, though his mercy be abun­dantly enough for all the world, (for ſince he ſwet, and bled Phy­ſick enough for all, it were more162 eaſie for him, to apply it to all, if that conduced to his ends,) yet becauſe his children were ever fro­ward, and grudged any part to others in this their Delivery, pours out all his ſea of Mercy upon them, and withdraws all from the Egyptians. Therefore he is ſaid to have hardned Pharaoh's heart. Which becauſe it is ſo of­ten repeated (at leaſt nine times) was done certainly all thoſe ways by which God can be ſaid to har­den us. Indurati­on.Either Ad captum hu­manum, when God deſcends to our phraſe of ſpeech, and ſerves our way of apprehending; Or permiſſively, when God, as it were looks another way,Corn. Cel­l. 5.3. & agrees with that counſell of the Phyſici­an, It is a diſcreet mans part to let him alone, which cannot be cu­red; Or ſubſtractively, when he withdrawes that ſpirituall food, which, becauſe it is ordained for children, muſt not be caſt to dogs; Or Occaſionally, when he preſents grace proportioned to a good end, in its own nature and quality,163 which yet he knows the taker will corrupt and envenom it, (for ſo, a Magiſtrate may occaſion evill, though neither he may, nor God can cauſe any;) Or els Ordinately and inſtrumentally, when God, by this Evill, workes a greater good; which yet was not Evill where it firſt grew, in the Para­diſe of Gods purpoſe and decree (for ſo no ſimple is Evill) but be­comes ſuch, when it comes to our handling, and mingling and ap­plying. Yea, that very Act which God puniſhed in Pharaoh, which was the oppreſſion, proceeded from God. For the Pſalmiſt ſays, He hardned their heart to hate his people,Pſ. 105.25 and to deal craftily with his ſervants. Percrius Ex. 1. That ſo by this Violence and this Deceit, they might have a double title to proffeſs themſelves of the Egyptians treaſure. And ac­cordingly for all their preſſures, he brought them away ſound; and rich, for all their deceit:Pſ. 105.37 He brought them forth with ſilver and gold, and there was none feeble in their tribes. Yea it is added, Egypt was glad164 at their departing; which God in­timated, when he ſaid,Exo. 11.1 when he letteth you go, he ſhall at once chaſe you hence. Only to paraphraſe the Hiſtory of this Delivery, without amplifying, were furniture and food enough for a meditati­on of the beſt perſeverence, and appetite, and digeſtion; yea, the leaſt word in the Hiſtory would ſerve a long rumination. If this be in the bark, what is in the tree? If in the ſuperficiall graſs, the let­ter; what treaſure is there in the hearty and inward Mine, the Mi­ſtick and retired ſenſe? Dig a lit­tle deeper, O my poor lazy ſoul, and thou ſhalt ſee that thou, and all mankind are delivered from an Egypt; and more miraculouſly then theſe. For, Almightineſs is ſo naturall to God, that no­thing done by his power, is very properly miracles, which is above all Nature. But God delivered us, by that which is moſt con­trary to him; by being impotent; by being ſin; by being Dead. That great Pharaoh, whoſe E­gypt165 all the world is by uſurpati­on, (for Pharaoh is but exemptus,Acacius de privile­giis. and privilegiatus; and that Name, (I hope not the Nature) is ſtrai'd into our word Baro) whom God hath made Prince of the air, and Prince of Darkneſs; that is, of all light and aiery illuſions, and of all ſad and earneſt wickedneſs, of Vanity, and of ſin; had made us fetch our own ſtraw, that is, painfully ſeek out light and bla­ſing Vanities; and then burn his brick, which is, the clay of our own bodies with concupiſcences and ambitions, to build up with our ſelves his Kingdome; He made us travell more for hell, then would have purchaſed Heaven; He enfeebled us from begetting or conceiving Male children, which are our good thoughts, and thoſe few which we had, he ſtrangled in the birth: And then, cameſt thou, O Chriſt, thine own Moſes, and deliveredſt us; not by doing, but ſuffering; not by killing, but dying. Go one ſtep lower, that is higher, and nea­rer166 to God, O my ſoul, in this Meditation, and thou ſhalt ſee, that even in this moment, when he affords thee theſe thoughts, he delivers thee from an Egypt of dulneſs and ſtupiditie. As often as he moves thee to pray to be de­livered from the Egypt of ſin, he delivers thee. And as often as thou promiſeſt him not to return thither, he delivers thee. Thou haſt delivered me, O God, from the Egypt of confidence and pre­ſumption, by interrupting my fortunes, and intercepting my hopes; And from the Egypt of deſpair by contemplation of thine abundant treaſures, and my porti­on therein; from the Egypt of luſt, by confining my affections; and from the monſtrous and unnatu­rall Egypt of painfull and weari­ſome idleneſs, by the neceſſities of domeſtick and familiar cares and duties. Yet as an Eagle, though ſhe enjoy her wing and beak, is wholly priſoner, if ſhe be held by but one talon; ſo are we, though we could be delivered of all ha­bit167 of ſin, in bondage ſtill, if Va­nity hold us but by a ſilken thred. But, O God, as mine inward cor­ruptions have made me mine own Pharaoh, and mine own Egypt; ſo thou, by the inhabitation of thy Spirit, and application of thy merit, haſt made me mine own Chriſt; and contenting thy ſelf with being my Medicine, alloweſt me to be my Phyſician. Laſtly, deſcend, O my Soul, to the very Center, which is the very Pole, (for in infinite things, incapable of diſtinction of parts, Higheſt and loweſt are all one) and conſider to what a land of promiſe, and heavenly Hieruſalem God will at laſt bring thee, from the Egypt of this world, & the moſt Egyptiacal part, this fleſh. God is ſo abun­dantly true, that he ever per­formes his words more then once. And therefore, as he hath fulfil­led that promiſe, Out of Egypt have I called my Son;Mat. 2.15. So will he alſo perform it in every one of his elect; and as when Herod dyed, his Angell appeared to Joſeph in168 Egypt in a dream, to call him thence; So when our perſecutor, our fleſh ſhall dy, and the ſlumber of death ſhall overtake us in this our Egypt, His Angels, ſent from Heaven, or his Angels newly crea­ted in us, (which are good de­ſires of that diſſolution,) or his Miniſteriall Angels in his militant Church, ſhall call and invite us from this Egypt to that Canaan. Between which (as the Iſraelites did) we muſt paſs a deſert; a diſunion and divorce of our body and ſoul, and a ſolitude of the grave. In which, the faithful and diſcreet prayers of them which ſtay behind, may much advan­tage and benefit us, and them­ſelves, if therby God may be mo­ved to haſten that judgment which ſhall ſet open Heavens greater gates, at which our Bodyes may enter, and to conſummate and ac­compliſh our ſalvation.

His Mer­cy in their Preſerva­tion.The next place is, to conſider his Mercy in their preſervation in the Deſert. For God hath made169 nothing which needs him not, or which would not inſtantly re­turn again to nothing without his ſpecial conſervation: Angels and our Souls are not delivered from this dependancy upon him. As therefore Conſervation is as great a work of Power as Creation; ſo the particuliar wayes of Gods pre­ſerving thoſe ſpecial people in the Wilderneſs, are as great works of Mercy, as the Delivery from E­gypt. And though this book of Exodus embrace not all thoſe, yet here are ſome inſtances of every kinde; as well of preſervation from extrinſick violences of War, as in­trinſick of Famine; and mix'd, of infirmities and diſeaſes. And becauſe Gods purpoſe had deſti­ned them to an offenſive War at laſt, let us mark by what degrees he inſtructed and nourſed them to it. They had been ever frozen in ſlavery, without uſe of Arms, or taſte of Honour, or Glory, or Vi­ctory. And becauſe they were ther­fore likely to forſake themſelves, and diſhonour him, God (faith the170 Hiſtory) carried them not by the way of the Philiſtims Country,Exod. 13.17. though that were nearer, leſt they ſhould repent when they ſee Warr, and turn again into Egypt. But preſently after, when he had con­tracted himſelf to them, and affirmed and affianced his preſence by the Sacrament of the Pillar, he was then content that they ſhould ſee an Army purſuing them; which was not ſo much terrible to them as they were Enemies, as that that they were their Maſters. For then they ex­claimed to Moſes,Exod. 14.11. Haſt thou brought us to die in the wilderneſs, becauſe there were no graves in E­gypt? Did not we ſay, let us be in reſt, that we may ſerve the E­gyptians? So ſoon did a dejecti­on make them call their former bondage, reſt; and ſink down to meet and invite death, when the Lord of life upheld them. And at this time, God uſed not their ſwords at all, yet gave them a full victory. But when this had warm'd them, as ſoon as the A­malekites171 made towards them, they fear'd not, murmur'd not, retir'd not; nay, they expected not: but ſaith Moſes, to Joſhuah, Chuſe us men, and go,Exod. 17.9 fight with Amalek. Which victory, leſt they ſhould attribute to themſelves, and ſo grow too forward in ex­poſing themſelves, and tempting God; the lifting up, or falling down of Moſes's hands in pray­er, that day, ſway'd and govern'd the battell. Which therfore God was eſpecially carefull that the ſouldier ſhould know; for ſo he commanded Moſes, Write that for a remembrance in the book,Exod. 17.14. and rehearſe it to Joſhuah. To their other wars this book ex­tends not: but is full of examples of his other mercies towards them, though they murmur'd; yea, by the words it may well ſeem, they were done becauſe they murmur'd: In the Morning ye ſhall ſee the glory of God, (ſayes Moſes to them) for,Exod. 16.7 he hath heard your grudging againſt him. And again, At evening ſhall the Lord172 give you fleſh;Ver. 8. for the Lord hath heard your murmuring. They murmur'd for water,Exod. 15.24. ſaying, What ſhall we drink? and then God preſented water; but leſt they ſhould attribute all that to the nature of the place, thoſe waters were too bitter to be drunk. Then God would ſweeten them; yet not by Miracle; but to encline them to a reverence of Moſes, he inform'd him, what would do it naturally; as it appears in ano­ther place, where the Art of phy­ſick is extoll'd: Was not the water made ſweet with wood,Eccl. 38.5. that men might know the vertue thereof? And yet, the next time that they murmur'd for water, he gave it them miraculouſly from the rock; to ſhew, that though Mo­ſes was enabled to all naturall works, yet he withdrew not his miraculous preſence from them. And then, when they murmur'd deſperately for meat, Oh that we had dyed in the Land of Egypt,Exo. 16.2. when we ſat by fleſh-pots, &c. the Lord, as though nothing in173 uſe, or in nature, had been pre­cious enough for them, rained down ſuch fowles, as no Natura­liſt ſince can tell what they were: and ſuch a grain, as though it a­bide the interpretation of panis fortium, and panis Angelorum, yet, ſaith a curious obſerver of thoſe ſubtilties, the name ſignifies,Fra. Geor. problem. fol. 45. Quid eſt hoc? which is eaſily ga­thered from the very Text, When they ſaw it, they ſaid to one ano­ther,Exod. 16.15. it is Man; for they wiſt not what it was. In which,Probl. 351 the ſame Problamiſt obſerves this wonder, that every man took a like proportion, and all were a­like ſatisfied, though all could not be of alike appetite and digeſtion. And a greater wonder, and by a better Author is obſerved in it, That it was meat for all taſts,Sap. 16.20 and ſerved to the appetite of him which took it, and was that which every man would. Yet this heavenly food they injured with a wearineſſe of it; and worſe, with their compa­riſons; for they cried, We remem­ber the fleſh we are in Egypt for174 nought,Num. 11.5. the cucumers, pepons, leeks, onions, and garlick. As though they had been leſſe worth, or they had paid more for it. If then they could chide him into mercy, and make him mercifull not only to their ſin, but for their ſin, where or when may we doubt of his mercy? Of which, we will here end the conſideration; not without an humble acknowledg­ment, that it is not his leaſt mer­cy, that we have been thus long poſſeſſed with the meditation thereof: for thus long we have been in the Harbour, but we launch into a main and unknown Sea, when we come to conſider his Power.

Of all the wayes in which God hath expreſſed himſelfe towards us, we have made no word which doth leſſe ſignifie what we mean, then Power: for Power, which is but an ability to do, ever relates to ſome future thing: and God is ever a preſent, ſimple, and pure Act. But we think we have done175 much, and gone far, when we have made up the word Omnipo­tence, which is both wayes im­proper; for it is much too ſhort, becauſe Omnipotence ſuppoſes and confeſſes a matter and ſubject to work upon, and yet God was the ſame, when there was nothing. And then it over-reaches, and goes down-wards beyond God: for God hath not, or is not ſuch an Omnipotence, as can do all things; for though ſqueamiſh and tenderer men think it more mannerly to ſay, This thing can­not be done, then, God cannot do this thing; yet it is all one: And if that be an Omnipotence, which is limited with the nature of the worker, or with the congruity of the ſubject, other things may in­croach upon the word Omnipo­tent; that is, they can do all things which are not againſt their nature, or the nature of the mat­ter upon which they work. Beza therefore might well enough ſay, That God could not make a body without place; And Prateolus176 might truly enough infer upon that,Verbo Be­zanitae. that the Bezanites (as he calls them) deny omnipotence in God; for both are true. And therefore I doubt not, but it hath ſome myſterie, that the word Om­nipotence is not found in all the Bible; nor Omnipotent in the New Teſtament. And where it is in the Old, it would rather be interpreted All-ſufficient, then Al­mighty; between which there is much difference. God is ſo Al-ſufficient, that he is ſufficient for all, and ſufficient to all: He is enough, and we are in him able enough to take and apply. We fetch part of our wealth, which is our faith, expreſly from his Treaſury: And for our good works, we bring the metall to his Mint, (or that Mint comes to us) and there the Character of Bap­tiſme, and the impreſſion of his grace, makes them currant, and ſomewhat worth, even towards him. God is all-efficient: that is, hath created the beginning, or­dained the way, fore-ſeen the177 end of every thing; and nothing elſe is any kind of cauſe thereof. Yet, ſince this word efficient, is now grown to ſignifie infallibility in God, it reaches not home to that which we mean of God; ſince man is efficient cauſe of his own deſtruction. God is alſo all-conficient: that is, concurs with the nature of every thing; for indeed the nature of every thing is that which he works in it. And as he redeemed not man as he was God, (though the Mercy, and Purpoſe, and Ac­ceptation were only of God) but as God and man; ſo in our repen­tances and reconciliations, though the firſt grace proceed only from God, yet we concurr ſo, as there is an union of two Hypoſtaſes, Grace, and Nature. Which, (as the incarnation of our Bleſſed Saviour himſelf was) is conceived in us of the Holy Ghoſt, without father; but fed and produced by us; that is, by our will firſt enabled and illumined. For neither God nor man determine mans will; for178 that muſt either imply a neceſſiting therof from God, or elſe Pelagia­niſme) but they condetermine it. And thus God is truly all-confici­ent, that is, concurrent in all; and yet we may not dare to ſay, that he hath any part in ſin. So God is alſo all-perficient: that is, all, and all parts of every work are his intirely: and leſt any might ſeem to eſcape him, and be attributed to Nature or to Art, all things were in him at once, before he made Nature, or ſhe Art. All things which we do to day were done by us in him, before we were made. And now, (when they are produced in time, as they were foreſeen in eternity,) his ex­citing grace provokes every parti­ticular good work, and his aſſi­ſting grace perfects it. And yet we may not ſay, but that God begins many things which we fru­ſtrate; and calls when we come not. So that, as yet our under­ſtanding hath found no word, which is well proportioned to that which we mean by power of God; much leſs of that refined and ſub­til179 part thereof, which we chief­ly conſider in this place, which is the abſolute and tranſcendent pow­er of Miracles, with which this Hiſtory abounds. For whatſoever God did for his Iſraelits, beſide Mi­racles, was but an extenſion of his Mercy, and belongs to that Para­graph which we have ended before.

Nature is the Common law by which God governs us, and Mi­racle is his Prerogative. For Mi­racles are but ſo many Non-ob­ſtantes upon Nature. And Mi­racle is not like prerogative in any thing more then in this, that no body can tell what it is. For firſt, Creation and ſuch as that, are not Miracles, becauſe they are not (to ſpeak in that language) Nata fi­eri per alium modum. And ſo, only that is Miracle, which might be done naturally, and is not ſo done. And then, leſt we allow the Divell a power to do Miracles, we muſt ſay, that Miracle is contra totam Naturam, againſt the whole order and diſpoſition of Nature. For as in Cities, a father governs180 his family by a certain Order, which yet the Magiſtrate of the City may change for the Cities good, and a higher Officer may change the Cities Order; but none, all, except the King: ſo, I can change ſome naturall things (as I can make a ſtone fly upward) a Phyſician more, and the Divell more then he; but only God can change all. And after that is out of neceſſity eſtabliſhed, that Mi­racle is againſt the whole Order of Nature, I ſee not how there is left in God a power of Miracles. For, the Miracles which are produced to day, were determined and in­ſerted into the body of the whole Hiſtory of Nature (though they ſeem to us to be but interlineary and Marginall) at the beginning, and are as infallible and certain, as the moſt Ordinary and cuſto­mary things. Which is evicted and approved by that which La­ctantius ſays, and particularly proves,De vera Sap. c. 15. that all Chriſts Miracles were long before prophecied. So that truly nothing can be done a­gainſt181 the Order of Nature. For, Saint Auguſtine ſays truly,Cont. Fau­ſtum l. 26. c. 3. That is Naturall to each thing, which God doth, from whom pro­ceeds all Faſhion, Number and Order of Nature: for that God, whoſe Decree is the Nature of e­very thing, ſhould do againſt his own Decree, if he ſhould do a­gainſt Nature. As therefore if we underſtood all created Nature, nothing would be Mirum to us; ſo if we knew Gods purpoſe, no­thing would be Miraculum. For certainly, thoſe Miracles which Moſes did, after God had once revealed to Moſes, that he would do them, were not Miracles to him, no more then the works of the Conjurers, which ex Ratione Rei, were as true as his. But the expreſſing of his power at this time was, that in the ſight of ſuch underſtanders and workmaſters, as the Magi were, he would do more without any Inſtrument conducing to thoſe ends, then they could do by their beſt in­ſtrument, the Divell; and ſo182 draw from them that confeſſion, Digitus Dei hìc eſt: for elſe who could have diſtinguiſhed between his and their works, or denied the name of Miracle to theirs? for they (not to depart at this time from vulgar Philoſophy; not that I bind your faith to it, but that if we abandon this, it is not eaſie and ready to conſtitute another ſo defenſible) by their power of locall Motion, and Application of Active and paſſive things, could oppoſe matter to heate, and ſo produce frogs truly; yea, when ſuch things are brought together by ſuch a workman, he can by them produce greater effects then nature could. As an Axe and timber being in the hand of a Statuary, he can make an I­mage; which they two, or a leſs skilfull Agent could not do. But God wrought not ſo: But, as Arnobius ſayes, he did them, Sine vi carminum,Adverſus Gent. l. 1. ſine herbarum aut graminum ſuccis, ſine ulla obſervatione ſollicita:De vera ſap. c. 15. but verbo, & juſſione, as Lactantius notes. By183 which means Arnobius pronoun­ces, none of the Philoſophers could cure an Itch;Adv. gent. l. 2. Nemo Phi­loſophorum potuit unquam ſcabi­em, unâ interdictione ſanare. An­other expreſſing of his power, was in this, that when he would, he intercepted their power; which was, when they attempted to make Cyniphs. For that is a kind of treaſon, and clipping God's coyn, to ſay, that they were hindered by naturall cau­ſes, for, if thoſe Cyniphs were­lice, (as many Tranſlations call them) and if ſweat be the mat­ter of them, and the Divel could not ordinarily provide ſtore of that, yet I ſay, their credit ſtood not upon the ſtory, but the fact: And then the Divel knew natural means, to warm and diſtill mul­titudes of men into ſweats: And laſt, if they were ſuch vermine, yet they are agreed to be of that kind which infeſt dogs; and they never ſweat. And if by Cyniph be expreſs'd ſome flie, not made till then, and then of putrefacti­on184 (for it were too much to al­low creatures of a new Species,) certainly, the Divell can produce all ſuch. Either then the crea­ture being meerly new, the Di­vell underſtood not of what it was compoſed; Or God changed the form of Duſt into another form, which the Divell could never do; or elſe, God manacled his hand in the eaſieſt thing, to confound him the more; for after this, it appears not that the Magi at­tempted to do any more Mira­cles. To diſcountenance then their deceits, and withall to af­flict the Land of Egypt, was the principall purpoſe of God in theſe Miracles: not to declare himſelf, or beget faith; for he doth not alwayes bind miracles to faith, nor faith to miracles. He will ſomtimes be believed without them; and ſomtimes ſpend them upon unbelievers; leſt men ſhould think their faith gave ſtrength to his power. For though it be ſaid,Mark 6.5. Chriſt could do no great works in his own countrey, for185 their unbeliefe: yet he did ſome there; which Saint Hierom ſayes,Ema. Sa­crâ, in hunc locum. was done, leſt they ſhould be ex­cuſable, having ſeen no Miracle: And he did not many, leaſt, as Theophylact ſayes, he ſhould after many Miracles reſiſted, have been forced in juſtice to a ſeverer pun­niſhment of them. But becauſe the danger of beleeving falſe miracles is extreamly great, and the eſſen­tiall differences of falſe and true, very few, and very obſcure, (for what humane underſtanding can diſcern, whether they be wrought immediately, or by ſe­cond cauſes; And then for the end to which they are addreſſed, what ſect of Chriſtians, or what ſect departed from all Chriſtians, will refuſe to ſtand to that law? If there ariſe a Prophet, and he give a wonder,Deut. 13.1. and the wonder come to paſſe, ſaying, let us go after other Gods, that Prophet ſhal be ſlaine.) I encline to think, that God for the moſt part, works his miracles rather to ſhew his Power, then Mercy, and to terrifie enemies,186 rather then comfort his children. For miracles leſſen the merit of faith. And our Bleſſed Saviour ſaid to the Phariſees, An evill ano­adulterous generation ſeeketh a ſign, And John Baptiſt,Mat. 12.38 Joh. 10. in whom there ſeems to have been moſt uſe of Miracles, did none. And though in this delivery from Egypt, for Pharaoh's hardneſs, God aboun­ded in Miracles, yet in their de­livery from Babylon, (of which in reſpect of this, the Prophet ſays, The day ſhall come,Her. 16. ſaith the Lord, that it ſhall no more be ſaid, The Lord liveth, that brought his ſons out of the land of Egypt; But the Lord liveth, that brought his ſons out of the land of the North) God proceeded without Miracles. And though in propagation of Chriſtian Religion in the new diſ­coveries, the Jeſuites have recor­ded infinite Miracles, yet the beſt amongſt them ingenuouſly deny it;Jo. Acoſta. de procur. Jud. ſal. l. 2. c. 9. And one gives this for a rea­ſon, why Miracles are not affor­ded by God now, as well as in the primitive Church, ſince the occa­ſion187 ſeems to be the ſame, That then ignorant men were ſent to preach Chriſtianity amongſt men armed and inſtructed againſt it, with all kindes of learnings and philoſophies; but now learned men are ſent to the ignorant; and are ſuperiour to them in Reaſon and in Civility, and in Authority; and beſides, preſent them a Re­ligion leſs incredible then their own. I ſpeak not thus, to che­riſh their opinion, who think God doth no Miracle now: that were to ſhorten his power, or to un­derſtand his counſels; but to re­ſiſt theirs, who make Miracles or­dinary. For, beſides that it con­tradicts and deſtroyes the Nature of Miracle, to be frequent, God at firſt poſſeſt his Church, (For­titer) by conqueſt of Miracles; but he governs it now, (ſua­viter) like an indulgent King, by a law which he hath let us know. God forbid I ſhould diſcredit or diminiſh the great works that he hath done at the tombs of his Martyrs, or at the pi­ous188 and devout commemoration of the ſanctity and compaſſion of his moſt Bleſſed Mother. But to ſet her up a Banke almoſt in every good Town, and make her keep a ſhop of Miracles greater then her Sons,Miracula B. Virg. ab Anno 1581 ad 1605. fo. 150. (for is it not ſo, to raiſe a childe, which was born dead, and had been buried ſeven­teen days, to ſo ſmall end?) (for it died again as ſoon as it was carri­ed from her ſight) is fearfull and dangerous to admit. God for­bid, I ſhould deny or obſcure the power and practice of our bleſſed Saviour, and his Apoſtles, in caſt­ing out Divels in the primitive Church: but that the Roman Church ſhould make an Occupa­tion of it, and bind Apprentices to it (for ſuch are thoſe little boys whom they make Exorciſts) and then make them free when they receive greater Orders, and yet forbid them to ſet up, or utter their ware but where they ap­point, is ſcarce agreeable to the firſt Examples, I dare not ſay, Inſtitution; for I ſee not that this189 Order had any. Why we do not ſo, the reaſon is, becauſe non fuit ſic ab initio: And no hardneſſe of heart is enough to juſtifie a toleration of theſe devout deceits and holy lyes, as they are often called amongſt themſelves. The Power of God, which we cannot name, needs not our help. And this very Hiſtory (in expounding of which Pererius inculcates ſo often, Non multiplicanda mira­cula) which ſeems the principalleſt record of Gods Miracles, though literally it ſeem to be directed to his enemies, by often expreſſing his power; yet to his children it inſinuates an Admonition, to be­ware of Miracles, ſince it tels them how great things the Divel did: And that his giving over in no great thing, but the leaſt of all, ſhows, That that was not a cancelling of his Patent, which he had in his Creation, but onely a Superſedeas not to execute it at that time. For, (excepting the ſtaying of the Sun, and carrying it back (if it be cleer that the body190 of the Sun was carried back, and not the ſhadow only) and a very few more) it appears enough, that the Divell hath done oftner grea­ter Miracles, then the children of God: For God delights not ſo much in the exerciſe of his Power, as of his Mercy and Juſtice, which partakes of both the other: For Mercy is his Paradiſe and garden, in which he deſcends to walk and converſe with man: Power his Army and Arſenel, by which he protects and overthrows: Juſtice his Exchequer, where he preſerves his own Dignity, and exacts our Forfeitures.

Even at firſt God intimated how unwillingly he is drawn to execute Juſtice upon tranſgreſſors; for he firſt exerciſed all the reſt: Mercy, in purpoſing our Creation; Power, in doing it; and Judg­ment, in giving us a Law: Of which the written part was in a volume and character ſo familiar and inward to us (for it was writ­ten in our hearts, and by Nature)191 as needed no Expoſitor: And that part which was vocall, and delivered by Edict and Proclama­tion, was ſo ſhort, ſo perſpicuous, and ſo eaſie (for it was but prohi­bitory, and exacted nothing from Man) as it is one of the greateſt ſtrangeneſſes in the Story, that they could ſo ſoon forget the Text thereof, and not eſpy the Ser­pents additions and falſifications. And then at laſt God interpoſed his Juſtice; yet not ſo much for Justice ſake, as to get opportunitie of new Mercy, in promiſing a Re­deemer; of new Power, in raiſing again bodies made mortall by that ſin; and of new Judgments, in delivering, upon more com­munications, a more particular law, apparelled with Ceremonies, the cement and mortar of all ex­terior, and often the inflamer of interior Religion. So that almoſt all Gods Juſtice is but Mercy: as all our Mercy is but Juſtice; for we are all mutuall debtors to one another; but he to none. Yea, both his Nature, and his will are192 ſo condition'd, as he cannot do Juſtice ſo much as man can. For, for his will, though he neither will nor can do any thing againſt Ju­ſtice, he doth many things beſide it. Nothing unjuſtly, but many things not juſtly: for he rewards beyond our Merits, and our ſins are beyond his puniſhments. And then, we have exerciſe as well of Commutative Juſtice as Diſtribu­tive; God only of the later, ſince he can receive nothing from us. And indeed, Diſtributive Juſtice in God, is nothing but Mercy. So that there is but one limb of Ju­ſtice left to God, which is Pu­niſhment; And of that, all the degrees on this ſide finall condem­nation, are acts of Mercy. So that the Vulture, by which ſome of the Ancients figured Juſtice, was a juſt ſymbole of this Juſtice;Pierius li. 18. for as that bird prayes onely upon Carcaſſes, and upon nothing which lives; ſo this Juſtice appre­hends none but ſuch as are dead and putrified in ſin and impeni­tence.

193To proceed then: All ordina­ry ſignifications of Juſtice will conveniently be reduced to theſe two, Innocence, which in the Scri­ptures is every where called Righ­teouſneſſe: or elſe Satisfaction for tranſgreſſions, which, though Chriſt have paid aforehand for us all, and ſo we are rather pardo­ned then put to ſatisfaction; yet we are bound at Gods tribunall to plead our pardon, and to pay the fees of contrition and pen­nance. For, ſince our juſtifica­on now conſiſts not in a pacifica­tion of God, (for then nothing but that which is infinite could have any proportion) but in the application of the merits of Chriſt to us, our contrition (which is a compaſſion with Chriſt, and ſo an incorporating of our ſelves into his merit) hath aliqualem pro­portionem to Gods Juſtice; and the paſſion of Chriſt had not aequa­lem, but that Gods acceptation (which alſo dignifies our contriti­on, though not to that height) advanced it to that worthineſſe. 194To enquire further the way and manner by which God makes a few do acceptable works; or, how out of a corrupt lumpe he ſelects and purifies a few, is but a ſtumbling block and a tentation: Who asks a charitable man that gives him an almes, where he got it, or why he gave it? will a­ny favorite, whom his Prince on­ly for his appliableneſs to him, or ſome half-vertue, or his own glo­ry, burdens with Honours and Fortunes every day, and deſtines to future Offices and Dignities, diſpute or expoſtulate with his Prince, why he rather choſe not another, how he will reſtore his Coffers; how he will quench his peoples murmurings, by whom this liberality is fed; or his No­bility, with whom he equalls new men; and will not rather repoſe himſelf gratefully in the wiſdome, greatneſs & bounty of his Maſter? Will a languiſhing deſperate pa­tient, that hath ſcarce time enough to ſwallow the potion, examine the Phyſician, how he procured195 thoſe ingredients, how that ſoyle nouriſhed them, which humor they affect in the body, whether they work by exceſs of quality, or ſpecifically; whether he have pre­pared them by correcting, or elſe by withdrawing their Malignity; and for ſuch unneceſſary ſcruples neglect his health? Alas, our time is little enough for prayer, and praiſe, and ſociety; which is, for our mutuall duties. Mo­rall Divinity becomes us all; but Naturall Divinity, and Metaphy­ſick Divinity, almoſt all may ſpare. Almoſt all the ruptures in the Chriſtian Church have been occaſioned by ſuch bold diſputa­tions De Modo. One example is too much. That our Bleſſed Sa­viours body is in the Sacrament, all ſay; The Roman Church ap­points it to be there by Tranſub­ſtantiation. The needleſs multi­plying of Miracles for that opinion hath moved the French and He­lvetick reformed Churches to find the word Sacramentally; which, becauſe it puts the body196 there, and yet no nearer then Heaven to Earth, ſeems a riddle to the Saxon and ſuch Churches; whoſe modeſty (though not clearneſs) ſeems greateſt in this Point; ſince beleeving the reall being of it there, they abſtain generally (though ſome bold ad­venturers amongſt them alſo do exorbitate) from pronouncing De Modo. The like tempeſts hath the inquiſition De Modo, rais'd in the article of Deſcent in­to Hell, even in our Church; and of the conveyance of Gods grace (which was the occaſion of this digreſſion) in the Roman at this day. But to decline this ſad contemplation, and to further our ſelves in the Meditation of Gods juſtice declared, in this Hi­ſtory, let me obſerve to you, that God in his Scriptures hath Regi­ſtred eſpecially three ſymbols or Sacraments, of uſe in this matter. One in Geneſis, of pure and meer Juſtice,Cha. 3.22. vindicative, and perma­nent; which is, The Cherubim and fiery ſword placed in Paradiſe,197 to keep out, not only Adam, but his Poſterity. The ſecond in Exodus, of pure and only Mercy,Ch. 25.17 which is the modell and fabrick of the Mercy ſeate, under the ſha­dow of two Cherubims wings. The third, partaking of both Mercy and Juſtice, and a Memori­all and ſeal of both, is the Raine­bow after the Deluge. Gen. 9.14.The firſt of theſe, which is of meer Juſtice, is ſo figurative, and ſo myſtick, and ſo unfit for Example or conſe­quence, and ſo diſputable whe­ther it laſted long, or ever were literally, that it ſeems God had no purpoſe to deliver any evident teſtimony of ſo ſevere and meer Juſtice. But that of meer Mercy, he made ſo familiar, that only deviſing the form himſelf, he committed the making of it to man: and ſo affiancing and bin­ding his Mercy to mans work, did, as it were, put his Mercy into our hands. Yet that alſo is long ſince tranſlated from us: and there remains only the middle one, more convenient, and proportionall,198 and uſefull. For, as it betokens his Juſtice in the precedent de­luge, or his Merey in aſſuring us from any future; ſo is it made of naturall and well known cauſes, (and thereby familiar to us) and yet became a Sacrament by Gods ſpeciall inſtitution then. Hom. 28. in Gen.And, though it ſhould be true which Chryſoſtome ſays, That it was a new miracle then, and never ap­peared before;De Noe & Area, cap. 27 yea, though that could be true which Ambroſe, ſomewhat againſt the text, and directly againſt the other Expoſi­tors, ſays, That the Bow mentioned there was not a Rainbow, but that A bow in the clouds, ſignifies only, The power of God in perſecution, and thereupon he obſerves, that God ſays, A Bow, but ſays not Ar­rows, to inflict terror, not wounds; Every way, I ſay, it doth the of­fice of remembring Gods Juſtice and Mercy together. And accor­dingly, in this large and particu­lar Hiſtory of Gods Juſtice and Perſecution, both towards his children, and his enemies, if we199 conſider their laborious waſte and maceratings of their bodies by hot and intemperate labour; All their contempts, and ſcorns, and a­viling, and annihilating in the eye of the Egyptians; All their Or­bity, and enfeebling their race by the Edict of deſtroying their male children; All their deviations and ſtrayings forty years, in a paſ­ſage of a few dayes; and all their penuries and battels in that jour­ney; And then for the Egyptians, if we looke upon all their afflicti­ons, firſt of plagues hatefull to their ſenſes, then noiſome to their fruites, then to their cattel, then to their bodies, then to their po­ſterity, then to their lives, excep­ting only the drowning of the E­gyptians in the ſea, and the kil­ling of the Iſraelites by their own hands in their guiltineſſe of Idola­try with the Calfe, it will ſcarce be found that any of the afflictions proceeded from meer Juſtice, but were rather as Phyſick, and had only a medicinall bitterneſſe in them. It remains, for determi­nation200 of this Meditation, that we ſpeake a little of Gods Judge­ments.

And at this time, (as by infi­nite places in the Scriptures we are directed) we call Gods Judge­ments, all thoſe lawes and directi­ons by which he hath informed the Judgements of his children, and by which he governes his Judgements with or againſt them. For otherwiſe this word Judge­ment hath alſo three profane, and three Divine acceptations. Of the firſt ſort, the firſt ſerves con­templations only, and ſo, Judge­ment is the laſt act of our under­ſtanding, and a concluſive reſo­lution: which both in private ſtudies, and at Counſail tables, many want, though endued with excellent abilities of obje­cting, diſputing, infirming, yea deſtroying others allegations; yet are not able to eſtabliſh or pro­poſe any other from themſelves. Theſe men, whether you conſult them in Religion, or State, or Law,201 onely when they are joyned with others, have good uſe, becauſe they bring doubts into diſceptati­on; elſe, they are, at leaſt unpro­fitable: and are but as Simpliciſts, which know the venom and pec­cant quality of every herbe, but cannot fit them to Medicin; or ſuch a Lapidary, which can ſoone ſpie the flaw, but not mend it with ſetting. Judgement in the Second acceptation ſerves for pra­ctice, and is almoſt ſynonimous with Diſcretion; when we conſi­der not ſo much the thing which we then do, as the whole frame and machine of the buſineſſe, as it is complexioned and circum­ſtanced with time, and place, and behoders: and ſo, make a thing, which was at moſt but in­different, good. The third way, Judgement ſerves not only preſent practice, but enlightens, and al­moſt governs poſterity; and theſe are Decrees and Sentences, and Judgments in Courts. The phraſe of Divinity alſo accepts Judgment three wayes; for ſomtimes it is202 ſevere and meer Juſtice, as, [Judg­ment muſt begin at the houſe of God,]1 Pet. 4.7. And many ſuch. And Judgment in this ſenſe, is deep and unſearchable. For, though Solomon pronounce,Eccl. 7.17. [There is a juſt man that periſheth in his ju­ſtice, and there is a wicked man that continueth long in his malice;] yet he enquires for no reaſon of it:Pſa. 36.6. For, [Gods righteouſneſs is like the mountains] eminent and inviting our contemplation to­wards Heaven; but, [his Judg­ments are like a great deep,] terri­ble and bottomleſs, and declining us towards the center of horrour and deſperation. Theſe judg­ments we cannot meaſure nor fa­thome; yet, for all that, we muſt more then beleeve them to be juſt; for the Apoſtle ſays, We know the Judgement of God is according to truth. Rom. 2.2.But yet of­tentimes Judgement ſignifies not meer Juſtice, but as it is attem­pred and ſweetned with Mercy. For, by the phraſe of the Pſalmiſt, [Judicabit populum in Juſtitia,Pſa. 72.2. &203 pauperes in Judicio] and many ſuch,Reuch. de Arte Ca­bul. l. 1. the Cabaliſts (as one which underſtood them well, obſerves) have concluded, that the word Judgment applyed to God, hath e­very where a mixt and participant nature, and intimates both Juſtice and Mercy. And thirdly, the Tal­mudiſts have ſtraitned the word, and reſtrain'd Judgment to ſigni­fie only the Judiciall part of the law: and ſay, the Holy Ghoſt ſo directed them, in Deut. [Theſe are the commandments, and the Ceremo­nies, and the Judgments, which the Lord commanded.] And they pro­ceed further; for,Deu. 4.13. Becauſe Gods Co­venant and his ten Commande­ments are ſaid ſimply to be given them, and without any limitati­on of time or place, they confeſs, they are bound to them ever, and every where; but, becauſe his Ordinances and his law, (which in the Original is, Ceremonies and Judgments) are thus delivered,Ver. 5. [You ſhall keep them in the Land which you go to poſſeſſe] they therefore now cut off Ceremonies204 and Judgements, from the body of the law,Galatinus, l. 11. c. 3. and in their diſperſion bind not themſelves to them, but where they may with convenience enough. But here we take the word Judgment intirely, to ſig­nifie all the law: for, ſo the Pſal­miſts ſpeaks,Pſ. 147.19 [He ſhowes his word unto Jacob, his Statutes and his Judgments unto Iſrael; he hath not dealt ſo with every Nation, nor have they known his Judgements]. For here Judgements are as much as all the reſt. And God him­ſelf in that laſt peice of his which he commanded Moſes to record,Deut. 32.4 that Heavenly Song which onely himſelf compos'd, (for though e­very other poetick part of Scrip­ture, be alſo Gods word, and ſo made by him, yet all the reſt were Miniſterially and inſtrumen­tally delivered by the Prophets, onely inflamed by him; but this which himſelf cals a Song, was made immediately by himſelf, and Moſes was commanded to deliver it to the Children; God chooſing this way and conveyance of a205 Song, as fitteſt to juſtifie his fu­ture ſeverities againſt his children, becauſe he knew that they would ever be repeating this Song, (as the Delicacy, and Elegancy ther­of, both for Divinity and Poetry, would invite any to that) and ſo he ſhould draw from their own mouthes a confeſſion of his bene­nefits, and of their ingratitude;) in this Song, I ſay, himſelf beſt expreſſes the value of this word thus, [All my wayes are Judge­ment.]

The greatneſs of this benefit or bleſſing of giving them a law, was not that ſalvation was due to the fulfilling of it; nor were they bound to a perfect fulfilling of it upon damnation; for, Salvation was ever from a faith in the pro­miſe of the Meſſias; and accor­dingly the Apoſtle reaſons ſtrongly, [The promiſe of Chriſt to A­braham was 430 years before the law,Gal. 3.17. and therefore this cannot diſ­annull that] and yet this to A­braham was but an iteration of the promiſe formerly given, and206 iterated often. But one benefit of the Law was, that it did in ſome meaſure reſtore them towards the firſt light of Nature: For, if man had kept that, he had neeeded no outward law; for then he was to himſelf a law, having all law in his heart; as God promiſeth for one of the greateſt bleſſings under the Goſpel, when the Law of Nature is more cleerly reſtored:Jer. 13.31. [I will make a new Covenant, and put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts:] So that we are brought neerer home, and ſet in a fairer way then the Jews; though their and our Law differ not as diverſe in ſpecies;Tho. 12 ae. q. 51.5. but as a perfect and grown thing from an unperfect and growing: for to that firſt Law all Laws aſpire. As we may obſerve in the Jews, who, after the Law of Nature was clou­ded and darkened in man by ſin, framed to themſelves many di­rective laws, before the promul­gation of this Law in the Deſart. Bretram. De politica Judaica. c. 2. For we may eaſily trace out, be­ſides Circumciſion, (which was207 commanded) Sabboths, Sacrifices of divers ſorts, Expiatory and Eu­chariſticall, Vows, Excommunica­tion, Buriall and Marriage, before the written Law. But theſe had but half the nature of Law; they did direct, but not correct; they did but counſell, not command: and they were not particular e­nough to do that office fully; for they ſhew'd not all. Ro. 3.20.Therefore Saint Paul ſayes of Moſes's Law, and the ſufficiency of it,Ro. 4.15. By the Law comes the knowledge of ſin. And in another place, Where no Law is, there is no tranſgreſſion: And again, When the Commande­ment came, ſin revived; that is,Rom. 7.9. it revived to his underſtanding and conſcience: For, that ſin was be­fore any written commandement, himſelf cleers it; Ʋnto the time of the Law was ſin in the world;Ro. 3.15. but ſin is not imputed when there is no law. Not that God imputes it not; (for there is always enough within us for him to try us by; and his written Laws are but De­claratory of the former;) but we208 impute it not to our ſelves, by confeſſion and repentance. This therefore is the benefit of the Law, that (as Calvin upon this place ſayes) Arguit, objurgat, & velli­cando nos expergefacit. Lev. 24.10We read in Leviticus, That a Blaſphemer was ſtoned, and after his execution a law was made againſt Blaſphe­mers: If it had been made before, perchance he had not periſhed. Of­tentimes lawes, though they be ambiguous, yea impoſſible, avert men from doing many things, which may, in their fear, be drawn within the compaſs of that Law. Not to go far for Examples; with­out doubt, our Law which makes Multiplication Felony, keeps ma­ny from doing things which may be ſo called, for any thing they know, though perchance no body know what Multiplication is. And our Law, which makes it Felony to feed a Sprit, holds many from that melancholick and miſchie­vous beleef of making ſuch an ex­preſs Covenant with the Divell, though every body know it is im­poſſible209 to feed a ſpirit. Another benefit of the law, (taking the law at large, for all the Scriptures, as the Apoſtle doth, [Tell me,Galat. 4 you that are under the law, have you not read in the law, &c.] and then cites a place out of Geneſis, before the law was given; And as Saint John ſays,Joh. 15.25 [It is written in the law] and then cites the 35 Pſalm) is, that it hath prepar'd us to Chriſt, by manifold and evident propheſies. Which uſe the Apo­ſtle makes of it thus, [Before faith came (that is to ſay,Gal. 3.24 the fulfil­ling of faith, for faith was ever) we were kept under the law, and ſhut up unto the faith which ſhould after be revealed: wherefore the law was our ſchoolmaſter to bring us to Chriſt.] Laſtly, the law be­nefits us thus, that it wraſtles with that other law which St. Paul found himſelfe not only ſubject to, but ſlave to,Rom. 7.13 [I am Captive to the law of ſin.] And, [I ſerve in my fleſh the law of ſin.] Theſe then were the advantages of the law; And had it any diſadvanta­ges? 210It is true, the laws were ma­ny; for, as the frame of our body hath 248 bones,Fra. Geor. To. 2. prob. 8. ſo the body of the law had ſo many affirmative precepts; and of the ſame number conſiſted Abrahams name, to whoſe ſeed the Meſſias, to whoſe knowledg all the law conduced, was promiſed. It hath alſo 365 negative precepts; and ſo many ſinews and ligatures hath our bo­dy, and ſo many dayes the year. But, not to purſue theſe curioſi­ties, beſides that, multiplicity of laws, (becauſe thereby little is left to the diſcretion of the Judg) is not ſo burdenous as it is thought, except it be in a captious, and en­tangling, and needy State; or un­der a Prince too indulgent to his own Prerogative: All this great number of lawes are obſerved by one,Galatinus. l. 11. c. 4. who (Capnio ſays) was breath'd upon by the Holy Ghoſt, to have been reduced by David to 11, by Eſay to 6, by Micheas to 3, and by Abacuc to one. The Lawgiver himſelf reduced them in the Decalogue to ten, and there­fore211 the Cabaliſts marke myſteri­ouſly,Fra. Geor. ibid. that in the Decalogue there are juſt ſo many letters, as there are precepts in the whole law. Yet certainly the number and intricacy and perplexity of theſe laws, (for their later Rabins, which make the Orall law their rule,Buxdorfius Synag. Jud. c. 4. fo. 44. inſiſt upon many both contradictions and imperfections in the letter of this law,) was extremely burdenous to the punctuall obſervers thereof. Yet, to ſay peremptorily that it could not be obſerved, ſeems to me, haſty. Though Calvin,Marlorate in hunc lo­cum. ci­ting Saint Hierome, [Si quis dix­erit, impoſſibile eſſe ſervare legem, Anathema ſit] ſay wiſely and tru­ly, that Hierom muſt not prevail ſo much as he which ſays, Why tempt you God, to lay a yoke upon the Diſciples necks,Act 15.10. which neither our Fathers nor we are able to bear? Yet that place in Deut. 30.8. hath as much Authority as this [Do all the Commandements which I com­mand thee this day;] therefore they might be done. And in a­nother verſe it is ſaid of all the212 Commandments, laws and Or­dinances together, [This Com­mandement is not hid from thee, nor far off; It is not in heaven, that thou ſhouldeſt ſay, who ſhall go up, and bring it down; nor be­yond ſea, that thou ſhouldſt ſay, who ſhal go beyond ſea and fetch it: but it is near thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart.] For, though the Prophet in Gods perſon ſay,Eze. 20.25 Dedi eis prae­cepta non bona; it was but in com­pariſon of the laws of the Go­ſpel: As our Saviour calls his A­poſtles evill comparatively;Mat. 7.11 [Yee which are evill, can give good things.] For ſimply,Homil. ad Rom. 13. in ver. 25. cap. 7. ad Rom. the law was good; And, as Chryſoſtome ſays, ſo eaſie, that they were eaſier things which were commanded by the written law, then by the law of Nature: As, to my under­ſtanding, in the point of concu­piſence it is evident; which in the firſt law of Nature, and now in the Goſpel, is prohibited, but was not ſo in the letter of the written law. Ibid.So much therefore as was required of them, (for ſo Calvin213 ſays) that is, to make the law a bridle, and a direction to them, was poſſible to them: and he concludes this point, and I with him, That even the re­generate do but half that them­ſelves, the grace of God perfecting the reſt.

FINIS.
214

PRAYERS.

O Eternall God, as thou didſt admit thy faith­full ſervant Abra­ham, to make the granting of one petition an incou­ragement and riſe to another, and gaveſt him leave to gather upon thee from fifty to ten; ſo I beſeech thee, that ſince by thy grace, I have thus long meditated upon thee, and ſpoken of thee, I may now ſpeak to thee. As thou haſt enlightned and enlarged me to contemplate thy greatneſs, ſo, O God, deſcend thou and ſtoop down to ſee my infirmities and the Egypt in which I live; and (If thy good pleaſure be ſuch) haſten mine Exodus and delive­rance, for I deſire to be, diſolved, and be with thee. O Lord, I moſt humbly acknowledg and confeſs215 thine infinite Mercy, that when thou hadſt almoſt broke the ſtaff of bread, and called a famine of thy word almoſt upon all the world, then thou broughteſt me in­to this Egypt, where thou hadſt ap­pointed thy ſtewards to husband thy bleſſings, and to feed thy ſtock. Here alſo, O God, thou haſt multiplied thy children in me, by begetting and cheriſhing in me reverent de­votions, and pious affections to­wards thee, but that mine own cor­ruption, mine own Pharaoh hath ever ſmothered and ſtrangled them. And thou haſt put me in my way towards thy land of promiſe, thy Heavenly Canaan, by removing me from the Egypt of frequented and populous, glorious places, to a more ſolitary and deſart retiredneſs, where I may more ſafely feed upon both thy Mannaes, thy ſelf in thy Sacrament, and that other, which is true Angells food, contemplation of thee. O Lord, I moſt humbly acknowledg and confeſs, that I feel in me ſo many ſtrong effects of thy Power, as only for the Ordina­rineſs216 and frequency thereof, they are not Miracles. For hourly thou rectifieſt my lameneſs, hourly thou reſtoreſt my ſight, and hour­ly not only delivereſt me from the Egypt, but raiſeſt me from the death of ſin. My ſin, O God, hath not onely cauſed thy deſcent hither, and paſſion here; but by it I am become that hell into which thou deſcendedſt after thy Paſſion; yea, after thy glorifica­tion: for hourly thou in thy Spirit deſcendeſt into my heart, to over­throw there Legions of ſpirits of Diſobedience, and Incredulity, and Murmuring. O Lord, I most humbly acknowledg and confeſſe, that by thy Mercy I have a ſenſe of thy Justice; for not onely thoſe afflictions with which it pleaſeth thee to exerciſe mee, awaken me to conſider how terrible thy ſevere ju­ſtice is; but even the rest and ſe­curity which thou affordeſt mee, puts me often into fear, that thou reſerveſt and ſpareſt me for a grea­ter meaſure of puniſhment. O Lord, I most humbly acknowledg217 and confeſſe, that I have under­ſtood ſin, by underſtanding thy laws and judgments; but have done a­gainst thy known and revealed will. Thou haſt ſet up many can­dlesticks, and kindled many lamps in mee; but I have either blown them out, or carried them to guide me in by and forbidden ways. Thou haſt given mee a deſire of know­ledg, and ſome meanes to it, and ſome poſſeſſion of it; and I have arm'd my ſelf with thy weapons againſt thee: Yet, O God, have mercy upon me, for thine own ſake have mercy upon me. Let not ſin and me be able to exceed thee, nor to defraud thee, nor to fruſtrate thy purpoſes: But let me, in de­ſpite of Me, be of ſo much uſe to thy glory, that by thy mercy to my ſin, other ſinners may ſee how much ſin thou canst pardon. Thus ſhow mercy to many in one: And ſhew thy power and al-mightineſſe upon thy ſelf, by casting manacles upon thine own hands, and calling back thoſe Thunder-bolts which thou hadſt thrown againſt me. Show218 thy Juſtice upon the common Se­ducer and Devourer of us all: and ſhow to us ſo much of thy Judgments, as may inſtruct, not condemn us. Hear us, O God, hear us, for this contrition which thou haſt put into us, who come to thee with that watch-word, by which thy Son hath aſſured us of acceſs. Our Father which art in Heaven, &c.

O Eternal God, who art not only firſt and laſt, but in whom, firſt and laſt is all one, who art not only all Mercy, and all Juſtice, but in whom Mercy and Justice is all one; who in the height of thy Ju­ſtice, wouldeſt not ſpare thine own, and only moſt innocent Son; and yet in the depth of thy mercy, would'ſt not have the wretched'st liver come to deſtruction; Behold us, O God, here gathered together in thy fear, according to thine ordinance, and in confidence of thy promiſe, that when two or three are gathered to­gether in thy name, thou wilt be in the midſt of them, and grant219 them their petitions. We confeſs, O God, that we are not worthy ſo much as to confeſs; leſs to be heard, leaſt of all to be pardoned our ma­nifold ſins and tranſgreſſions a­gainſt thee. We have betrayed thy Temples to prophaneſs, our bodies to ſenſuality, thy fortreſſes to thine enemy, our ſoules to Satan. We have armed him with thy munition to fight againſt thee, by ſurrendring our eyes, and eares, all our ſenſes, all our faculties to be exerciſed and wrought upon, and tyrannized by him. Vanities and diſguiſes have covered us, and thereby we are na­ked; licenciouſneſs hath inflam'd us, and thereby we are frozen; vo­luptuouſneſs hath fed us, and ther­by we are ſterved, the fancies and traditions of men have taught and instructed us, and thereby we are ignorant. Theſe diſtempers, thou only, O God, who art true, and perfect harmonie, canſt tune, and rectify, and ſet in order again. Doe ſo then, O moſt Mercifull Father, for thy moſt innocent Sons ſake: and ſince he hath ſpread his armes220 upon the croſs, to receive the whole world, O Lord, ſhut out none of us (who are now fallen before the throne of thy Majeſty and thy Mercy) from the benefit of his merits; but with as many of us, as begin their converſion and new­neſs of life, this minute, this mi­nute, O God, begin thou thy ac­count with them, and put all that is paſt out of thy remembrance. Accept our humble thanks for all thy Mercies; and, continue and enlarge them upon the whole Church, &c.

O Moſt glorious and moſt gra­cious God, into whoſe pre­ſence our own conſciences make us afraid to come, and from whoſe pre­ſence we cannot hide our ſelves, hide us in the wounds of thy Son, our Saviour Chriſt Jeſus; And though our ſins be as red as ſcarlet, give them there another redneſs, which may be acceptable in thy ſight. We renounce, O Lord, all our con­fidence in this world; for this221 world paſſeth away, and the luſts thereof: Wee renounce all our confidence in our own merits for we have done nothing in reſpect of that which we might have done; neither could we ever have done any ſuch thing, but that ſtill we must have remained unprofitable ſervants to thee; we renounce all confidence, even in our own confeſ­ſions, and accuſations of our ſelf; for our ſins are above number, if we would reckon them; above weight and meaſure, if we would weigh and meaſure them; and paſt finding out, if we would ſeek them in thoſe dark corners, in which we have multiplied them againſt thee: yea we renounce all confidence even in our repentances; for we have found by many lamentable experi­ences, that we never perform our promiſes to thee, never perfect our purpoſes in our ſelves, but relapſe again and again into thoſe ſins which again and again we have re­pented. We have no confidence in this world, but in him who hath taken poſſeſsion of the next world222 for us, by ſitting down at thy right hand. We have no confidence in our merits, but in him, whoſe merits thou haſt been pleaſed to accept for us, and to apply to us, we have: no confidence in our own confeſsions and repentan­ces, but in that bleſſed Spirit, who is the Author of them, and loves to perfect his own works and build up­on his own foundations, we have: Ac­cept them therefore, O Lord, for their ſakes whoſe they are; our poor endea­vours, for thy glorious Sons ſake, who gives them their root, and ſo they are his; our poor beginnings of ſanctification, for thy bleſſed Spirits ſake, who gives them their growth, and ſo they are his: and for thy Sons ſake, in whom only our prayers are ac­ceptable to thee: and for thy Spirits ſake which is now in us, & muſt be ſo whenſoever we do pray acceptably to thee; accept our humble prayers for, &c.

O Eternal & moſt merciful God, againſt whom, as we know & acknowledg that we have multiplied contemptuous and rebellious ſins, ſo we know and acknowledg too, that it223 were a more ſinfull contempt and re­bellion, then all thoſe, to doubt of thy mercy for them; have mercy upon us: In the merits and mediation of thy Son, our Saviour Chriſt Jeſus, be mercifull unto us. Suffer not, O Lord, ſo great a waſte, as the effuſion of his blood, without any return to thee; ſuffer not the expence of ſo rich a treaſure, as the ſpending of his life, without any purchace to thee; but as thou didſt empty and evacuate his glory here upon earth, glorify us with that glory which his humilia­tion purchaſed for us in the kingdom of Heaven. And as thou didſt empty that Kingdome of thine, in a great part, by the baniſhment of thoſe An­gels, whoſe pride threw them into e­verlasting ruine, be pleaſed to re­pair that Kingdom, which their fall did ſo far depopulate, by aſſuming us into their places, and making us rich with their confiſcations. And to that purpoſe; O Lord, make us ca­pable of that ſucceſsion to thine Angels there; begin in us here in this life an angelicall purity, an angeli­call chaſtity, an angelicall integrity224 to thy ſervice, an Angelical acknow­ledgment that we alwaies ſtand in thy preſence, and ſhould direct al our actions to thy glory. Rebuke us not, O Lord, in thine anger, that we have not done ſo till now; but ena­ble us now to begin that great work; and imprint in us an aſſurance that thou receiveſt us now graciouſly, as reconciled, though enemies; and fatherly, as children, though prodi­gals; and powerfully, as the God of our ſalvation, though our own con­ſciences teſtifie againſt us. Conti­nue and enlarge thy bleſsings upon the whole Church, &c.

FINIS.

About this transcription

TextEssayes in divinity; by the late Dr Donne, Dean of St Paul's. Being several disquisitions, interwoven with meditations and prayers: before he entred into holy orders. Now made publick by his son J. D. Dr of the civil law.
AuthorDonne, John, 1572-1631..
Extent Approx. 247 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 118 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
Edition1651
SeriesEarly English books online.
Additional notes

(EEBO-TCP ; phase 2, no. A81613)

Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 169845)

Images scanned from microfilm: (Thomason Tracts ; 179:E1362[1])

About the source text

Bibliographic informationEssayes in divinity; by the late Dr Donne, Dean of St Paul's. Being several disquisitions, interwoven with meditations and prayers: before he entred into holy orders. Now made publick by his son J. D. Dr of the civil law. Donne, John, 1572-1631., Donne, John, 1604-1662.. [16], 224 p. Printed by T. M. for Richard Marriot, and are to be sold at his shop in St Dunstan's Church-yard Fleet-street,London :1651.. (Signatures: A⁶ chi² B-K¹² L⁴.) (Signatures from Keynes.) (Contents: A1 title; A2a-6b dedication to Sr H. Vane Junior signed John Donne (A2 with sig. A3, A2-6 usually cancelled in whole or part); chi1a-b To the Reader, unsigned; chi2 blank (usually cancelled); B1a-K11a (pp. 1-213) Essayes in Divinity; K11b-L4b (pp. 214-24) Prayers. Cf. Keynes.) ('When the younger Donne decided to make the Juvenilia more respectable by adding the Essayes in Divinity he felt he must try to suppress his dedication to Sir Henry Vane with .. confusing results' -- Keynes. Copies lacking any and all leaves of dedication are not imperfect.) (Annotation on Thomason copy: "Jan: 1st".) (Reproduction of the original in the British Library.)
Languageeng
Classification
  • Christianity -- Early works to 1800.

Editorial statement

About the encoding

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial principles

EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.

EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).

The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.

Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.

Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.

Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.

The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.

Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).

Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.

Publication information

Publisher
  • Text Creation Partnership,
ImprintAnn Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2011-04 (EEBO-TCP Phase 2).
Identifiers
  • DLPS A81613
  • STC Wing D1861
  • STC Thomason E1362_1
  • STC ESTC R209209
  • EEBO-CITATION 99868101
  • PROQUEST 99868101
  • VID 169845
Availability

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.